Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(27-12-2021 13:36 )Glenn Miller Wrote:  

(27-12-2021 13:07 )Nitro2020 Wrote:  they are just choosing to censor themselves at the moment

Definitely.

Seeing what's happening in parliament with the online harms, they are showing what a responsible broadcaster Babestation is.

Do you like the fact the web shows have become tv standard content though?

(27-12-2021 11:27 )scooby_doo Wrote:  

(27-12-2021 02:52 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(26-12-2021 20:45 )scooby_doo Wrote:  (You can't hide the tail of the toy and in fact its against the rules to use it on tv),

As I understood it, that was just a Bs rule after one or two of the babes got careless. So it's likely at the producers discretion to allow it again.

Yep BS rule so you can hide the tail etc but if you look at the thong you know its there i.e it wouldn't be skin tight anymore. With the lovense its near enough impossible to hide the tail because its not designed to be invisible. Like you say the big thing it becomes visible on TV big problems and thats why they were told not to use them on TV (But still allowed you to buzz something thats not in use so ripping off the punters, just use the tips button)

We have an eye witness that says it is possible to hide the tail. And, since it was Beth, I'm prepared to accept it was working ok.
Obviously that might not be the case with some of the other babes, but it's clearly not as impossible to use it on tv as you keep saying.

(27-12-2021 13:38 )Nitro2020 Wrote:  Do you like the fact the web shows have become tv standard content though?

I don't think anyone likes it. I haven't heard anyone express approval anyway, although someone who goes private a lot might not be too bothered.

(27-12-2021 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  We have an eye witness that says it is possible to hide the tail. And, since it was Beth, I'm prepared to accept it was working ok.
Obviously that might not be the case with some of the other babes, but it's clearly not as impossible to use it on tv as you keep saying.

What I actually said was its impossible to hide it so you can't see its there, for example a bulge in the thong even a small one as an example. In fact surely that being evident is a good thing means the toys in use and doesn't break the rules either. You wear a skin tight micro thong as an example and can't see anything I'm sorry but no toy..

My exact line "Yep BS rule so you can hide the tail etc.....". Maybe re-read the post.

(27-12-2021 14:42 )scooby_doo Wrote:  My exact line "Yep BS rule so you can hide the tail etc.....".

Yeah, but only after I pulled you up on a previous post.

(26-12-2021 20:45 )scooby_doo Wrote:  (You can't hide the tail of the toy and in fact its against the rules to use it on tv),

We all know what the score is. You're starting to sound like a broken record.

(27-12-2021 23:49 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(27-12-2021 14:42 )scooby_doo Wrote:  My exact line "Yep BS rule so you can hide the tail etc.....".

Yeah, but only after I pulled you up on a previous post.

(26-12-2021 20:45 )scooby_doo Wrote:  (You can't hide the tail of the toy and in fact its against the rules to use it on tv),

We all know what the score is. You're starting to sound like a broken record.

My exact post was regarding hiding the tail in the pussy... and on this part we're talking about hiding in a thong. I'm not here to have a slanging match with yourself so this will be my last comment on the matter but at least get the context of stuff correct before having a pop at another member. Also I seem to remember you were the one having a pop at a model in post 27417 but then to your credit did say fair play to her when you'd got the extra facts.

Where all here to discuss stuff so lets just play nice ok, we all have our opinions, favourite girls etc and its quite easy to do without having a pop at people in the process.

good point but the issue is these other companies are not Uk based and the likes of Ofcom are more likely to go after Uk ones. So you have a case of Uk companies having to censor while rest of the world get away with it

(27-12-2021 13:35 )Nitro2020 Wrote:  

(27-12-2021 13:24 )scooby_doo Wrote:  

(27-12-2021 13:07 )Nitro2020 Wrote:  Thanks for the response, so they can go back to what seemed successful, they are just choosing to censor themselves at the moment. Strange because it just means less money being spent, especially by new or casual tippers. Thanks again for the response.

Your welcome, basically you do have to have some basic age verification in place and can be able to demonstrate you are putting things in place to allow the apps that block unsafe things for kids to work currently. And to buy content you have to ensure the purchaser (In this case credits) is over 18, most of thats done by the payments providers but they have to ensure they have the systems in place. (But thats always been like that).

I can understand the need for age verification etc. It just seems odd considering the rest of the World Wide Web does not enforce these rules. A webshow should be more explicit than what’s on tv, whilst now they are practically the same, to the detriment of their money making ability. Hopefully they see sense and resume the webshow to more explicit content. Here’s hoping anyways lol.

Well, Beth just finished her recent stint and for the last few minutes of her show aimed at the perv cam she was unable to conceal the tail of the wand it would seem. In fact the whole wand became visible with the excitement of the occasion. All on camera.

(28-12-2021 01:33 )russmeyer Wrote:  good point but the issue is these other companies are not Uk based and the likes of Ofcom are more likely to go after Uk ones. So you have a case of Uk companies having to censor while rest of the world get away with it

(27-12-2021 13:35 )Nitro2020 Wrote:  

(27-12-2021 13:24 )scooby_doo Wrote:  

(27-12-2021 13:07 )Nitro2020 Wrote:  Thanks for the response, so they can go back to what seemed successful, they are just choosing to censor themselves at the moment. Strange because it just means less money being spent, especially by new or casual tippers. Thanks again for the response.

Your welcome, basically you do have to have some basic age verification in place and can be able to demonstrate you are putting things in place to allow the apps that block unsafe things for kids to work currently. And to buy content you have to ensure the purchaser (In this case credits) is over 18, most of thats done by the payments providers but they have to ensure they have the systems in place. (But thats always been like that).

I can understand the need for age verification etc. It just seems odd considering the rest of the World Wide Web does not enforce these rules. A webshow should be more explicit than what’s on tv, whilst now they are practically the same, to the detriment of their money making ability. Hopefully they see sense and resume the webshow to more explicit content. Here’s hoping anyways lol.

That makes sense. But seeing as the Online Harm Bill is not yet set in stone, it just seems odd to really restrict their content. Some people will always tip, but now the casuals aren’t going to tip for much tamer shows. Makes me laugh how the government try and censor stuff like this but are happy for cancel cultures and gender ideologies to be pushed without any resistance.

Seems France is going to block porn hub and 4 other sites

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...rs-18.html