Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(26-12-2021 16:35 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  Winsaw, That's hardly the point. it sounds like your praising BS for doing the right thing & paying money back. Isn't it the case that they should be praised for never cheating punters in the first place.
Is it closer to the truth that not enough punters make claims against them, otherwise, if everyone made claims & they payed everyone's money back, then what would be the point in trying to con them in the first place ?

Not sure why u think that what I was talking about mate I was replying to tony confederate and simple pointing out to him that it's a lot more easy than he was making out to get your money back if something goes wrong,
Don't see why you thought it was praise for bs , how could it be when they are paying money back for doing something wrong,
I do agree though not enough people claim when things have not happened like they should, I would guess the shows bet on this that only 10 out if a 100 claim so they will always try to get away with it as long as it's like that,

(26-12-2021 16:33 )tony confederate Wrote:  attempt a fraudulent chargeback against Playboy and see what happens.

At no point was I talking about fraud why would you think that, I was talking about people who paid for things they didn't get, that's the company in the wrong not the person putting in a claim

(26-12-2021 20:00 )scooby_doo Wrote:  if after the show you find out it was a fraud (i.e not the service you paid for) and have the proof

What kind of proof would you have?

(26-12-2021 20:34 )get in the van Wrote:  

(26-12-2021 20:00 )scooby_doo Wrote:  if after the show you find out it was a fraud (i.e not the service you paid for) and have the proof

What kind of proof would you have?

As an example screen caps taken at the time of the show, for instance Buzzing on tv when the toy is clearly not visible for a frontal shot (You can't hide the tail of the toy and in fact its against the rules to use it on tv), or in the case of my one the girl actually forgetting to turn the mic off and asking the producer what to do with the toy and being told just hide it (In my case a web show).

(26-12-2021 20:45 )scooby_doo Wrote:  Buzzing on tv when the toy is clearly not visible

So why would you buzz then?

(26-12-2021 21:01 )get in the van Wrote:  

(26-12-2021 20:45 )scooby_doo Wrote:  Buzzing on tv when the toy is clearly not visible

So why would you buzz then?

I don't but others have, and on some occasions the girls are very good at getting into positions so you cannot see. Like I say my incident was a web show, again positions so you can't easily tell but then you hear the admission on the mic. Once bitten you don't do it again.

(26-12-2021 20:30 )winsaw Wrote:  

(26-12-2021 16:35 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  Winsaw, That's hardly the point. it sounds like your praising BS for doing the right thing & paying money back. Isn't it the case that they should be praised for never cheating punters in the first place.
Is it closer to the truth that not enough punters make claims against them, otherwise, if everyone made claims & they payed everyone's money back, then what would be the point in trying to con them in the first place ?

Not sure why u think that what I was talking about mate I was replying to tony confederate and simple pointing out to him that it's a lot more easy than he was making out to get your money back if something goes wrong,
Don't see why you thought it was praise for bs , how could it be when they are paying money back for doing something wrong,
I do agree though not enough people claim when things have not happened like they should, I would guess the shows bet on this that only 10 out if a 100 claim so they will always try to get away with it as long as it's like that,

No problem mate, it was your use of ^^ which made me reply, as I'd posted between the post made by tony confederate. I tend to use ^^ instead of the reply function, when it's been a long post, it doesn't always read well if someone else posts before you do.

Thank for clearing that up I perhaps read a little too much into what you were saying. Shame the channels aren't as transparent as we are here, mostly.

(26-12-2021 20:45 )scooby_doo Wrote:  (You can't hide the tail of the toy and in fact its against the rules to use it on tv),

As I understood it, that was just a Bs rule after one or two of the babes got careless. So it's likely at the producers discretion to allow it again.

(27-12-2021 02:52 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(26-12-2021 20:45 )scooby_doo Wrote:  (You can't hide the tail of the toy and in fact its against the rules to use it on tv),

As I understood it, that was just a Bs rule after one or two of the babes got careless. So it's likely at the producers discretion to allow it again.

Yep BS rule so you can hide the tail etc but if you look at the thong you know its there i.e it wouldn't be skin tight anymore. With the lovense its near enough impossible to hide the tail because its not designed to be invisible. Like you say the big thing it becomes visible on TV big problems and thats why they were told not to use them on TV (But still allowed you to buzz something thats not in use so ripping off the punters, just use the tips button)

Morning all, can anyone explain to me please why the BS web shows are so tame now compared to a month or so ago. I keep hearing these OFCOM new rules, but how come sites such as MFC and Chaturbate have no such restrictions? Are BS just censoring themselves to try and gain more out of the viewers?