Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

and what's wrong with the girls these days , either it's the view of their forehead or feet, and this goes for the whole session , I wonder if I call what to ask for

Interesting to see if Keira Knight is back tonight, the s66 website & Instagram schedule says she is whereas twitter doesn’t have her on

(07-12-2019 16:41 )Didokan Wrote:  and what's wrong with the girls these days , either it's the view of their forehead or feet, and this goes for the whole session , I wonder if I call what to ask for

Unfortunately the production and specifically the camera work is almost exclusively horseshit. If you want the camera zoomed out you have to call and ask for it.

(07-12-2019 15:48 )winsaw Wrote:  ...the new at home shows are not shown on firestorm platform so they must not have done a deal to show them, I wonder if this is why the tech picture ect is not so good as 66 are doing it themselves and not using firestorm equipment,

I know winsaw wont mind me clarifying a little here. First, I think he's skipped over a central point - perhaps judging everyone to be as clued up as he is. The idea is that third party streaming site Rampant-tv and FS are somehow linked at their top... Then, operators traditionally want their streams on the Rampant platform for wider availability - but the channels have to pay Rampant a cut of any revenue made through them for the privilege. 66 have long kept access to their perv streams off Rampant, so restricting the latter's access further just follows that and another recent trend adopted by smaller non-TV operators in pulling away from Rampant affiliation.

Also, the idea that the home cam streams are not using FS "equipment" is also a bit of a misnomer and maybe misleading. As far as I can see these new streams are using the same FS operating system and servers as the rest of the 66 streams. The only significant difference is in that final distribution - with, presumably, 66 judging they don't need the extra access offered by Rampant and that they have a better redistribution of the cut of the monies that would have gone there... All other things being equal, pic quality should be the same as elsewhere; trouble is all other things are clearly not equal (the big let down often being lighting if I'm any judge).

I think the home streaming could be a winner for S66 and in principle is probably a good idea, IF done right and that's the issue, S66 don't get shit right, they have some good ideas but the execution is fucked up the arse.

The home streaming will suffer the same fate as the rest of their output with incredibly lacklustre production, streams coming and going, lagging picture quality, buffering, freezing etc and if and when S66 do eventually get it right too much time will have passed and any positives from the idea will have died on its arse.

I see all the better girls are doing more webcam stints for their xmas bonus, plus kaitlin laken to get her few extra quid aswell. Shame they can't sort out the 480p streaming off-site. HD cameras have been around for over 12 years now...

Hilarious standards as usual. A quick comparison with other sites....

Livejasmin - all HD with a minimum connection speed required for models

Chaturbate - all options - up to 4K for some models.

MFC - HD available. Working on higher quality but taking their time over it.

S66 - fuck it, just use an old Potato cam and a long bit of string. That'll do.

(07-12-2019 23:18 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  Hilarious standards as usual. A quick comparison with other sites....

Livejasmin - all HD with a minimum connection speed required for models

Chaturbate - all options - up to 4K for some models.

MFC - HD available. Working on higher quality but taking their time over it.

S66 - fuck it, just use an old Potato cam and a long bit of string. That'll do.

naah, let's get that HD cam we had in 1990 out of the cupboard, and use that cable that fell off the back of a lorry in 1986

(07-12-2019 21:03 )ShandyHand Wrote:  The big let down often being lighting if I'm any judge.

I recall one of us praising the quality of S66's cameras and lighting in comparison to that at BS and I support Shandy for stressing lighting.
I've noticed a few astute technical remarks from Fernanda over the years and gallerys66 writing that she likes to be lit brightly. When she first presented from home a few weeks ago I read her remark that S66 had to send her some more lights in a taxi.
The picture quality from Ferrari Towers was the equal of any I've seen from any other home as can be seen in post 19 by Danzig

Paige Green and her famous 'hand thong' yet agin