Evelyn (Daytime Queen 2018) - S66 Dayshow Chat & Discussion (Only)

^ she certainly reads this thread Neil, so she will be delighted with your plaudits.

My queen is looking lovely today

Another amazing finish, but why do they have to take her off early?

The worst production for 2 years and, as a result, the worst show for 2 years. What the hell are 66 playing at?

loved those stockings again Evelyn you made my day, i know you read this forum you sexy minx i will call you soon and we can have stockings/suspenders naughty chat

(07-03-2019 23:09 )Rake Wrote:  The worst production for 2 years and, as a result, the worst show for 2 years. What the hell are 66 playing at?

Yep, no good. One of her shortest 9pm segments in a while. Started late as fuck, they logo'd her for no reason multiple times, and I don't know who came up with the genius idea that the shows should end 10 minutes early, but it's been 3 or 4 times now recently. Maybe they assume everyone will just hop backstage. Are none of the other 3 streams ever available for these early starting tease hours?






...Why?

(07-03-2019 23:09 )Rake Wrote:  The worst production for 2 years and, as a result, the worst show for 2 years. What the hell are 66 playing at?

66 has gone downhill this year in general, barely a slip all year, girls keeping all their clothes on after ten under the guise of tease shows. Check out the slip chat thread, handful of posts in months. The webcam has taken priority so tv gets the scraps.

Tbf the issues began on Monday's session...
First, sorry kent but the stockings are a needless cock blocker to Eve's fantastic legs. (What is it with this utter infection 66 tease girls have that they must play silly fetishistic dress up to be a draw late at night? Clothes are tools to be teased about and away from the body; one where less is definitely more.)

Second, the fact that any room for a ratcheting visual build up has been cut to the bone by the ever shortening time given to this section of her show. This could be put down to interactors having faded away before 9.30; but how much have 66 'encouraged' Eve to contain all the top content, in an artifical manner, to the last half hour - out of fear she might do something too 'exciting' too early? Punters have just followed Eve's lead on this I feel and are using their money where it'll likely have best effect. Eve and 66 have the ability to change that.

This was a show saved by Eve's zappity pow last 20 minutes and the savvy premeditation of that awesome payoff .

Last night, otoh, things got fundamentally bad. This one was, for sure, the meanest, shortest, Eve tease in her time doing this. The irriating devises above were compound by worse ones...
1. The spooked night manager made production decisions that showed no affinity for what has been established by his meticulous and conscienctious babe over many, many, months. (Is this the same guy that pulled the camera from Eve's room truncating her show in early Feb perhaps? It felt like it.) Such a great job he did pissing on all his babe's previous hard work.

Look at 830s telling clips of Eve's logoings. How is it babe and prod can be so out of simpatico?

2. Eve herself was not immune to dodgy decisions it has to said... The outfit this time was garishly ill-matching and the black top yelded no shape to the contours of the body when seen on TV. Just about her only saving grace were the bits where she showed an almost total disregard for the position of her skirt up around her waist.

There was little chance to build any momentum with the audience here; no crowd pleasing collaborative moments arranged with backstage; no consideration to much of anything really. Only an impatience and intolerance in every sight of a production hand.

So instead of a proud finishing flourish to inspire, we cut abruptly to 66's 'new' usurping ploy - the official tease babe starting early (something they dropped years back* when all teases used to start at 9.30). A babe capable of the most unique subtle and bold eroticism was cast off to get 10 more minutes of an unmoving stick-up-the-back generic blonde with electric tape over her nips - while leaving dead air on the two other streams!

66 you're creating these segments' own downturn by deliberate action - just so you can be totally risk averse. And you wonder why guys don't return to interact! Do you want no more of Eve's TV tease money? Has it got too hot to handle for you, because why else throw away what has been built with such signalling to the audience not to bother anymore? This was just tiresome for the regular interactor and troublingly weak all round.


* An admission you got this wrong 66?!

(08-03-2019 21:56 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Tbf the issues began on Monday's session...
First, sorry kent but the stockings are a needless cock blocker to Eve's fantastic legs. (What is it with this utter infection 66 tease girls have that they must play silly fetishistic dress up to be a draw late at night? Clothes are tools to be teased about and away from the body; one where less is definitely more.)

Second, the fact that any room for a ratcheting visual build up has been cut to the bone by the ever shortening time given to this section of her show. This could be put down to interactors having faded away before 9.30; but how much have 66 'encouraged' Eve to contain all the top content, in an artifical manner, to the last half hour - out of fear she might do something too 'exciting' too early? Punters have just followed Eve's lead on this I feel and are using their money where it'll likely have best effect. Eve and 66 have the ability to change that.

This was a show saved by Eve's zappity pow last 20 minutes and the savvy premeditation of that awesome payoff .

Last night, otoh, things got fundamentally bad. This one was, for sure, the meanest, shortest, Eve tease in her time doing this. The irriating devises above were compound by worse ones...
1. The spooked night manager made production decisions that showed no affinity for what has been established by his meticulous and conscienctious babe over many, many, months. (Is this the same guy that pulled the camera from Eve's room truncating her show in early Feb perhaps? It felt like it.) Such a great job he did pissing on all his babe's previous hard work.

Look at 830s telling clips of Eve's logoings. How is it babe and prod can be so out of simpatico?

2. Eve herself was not immune to dodgy decisions it has to said... The outfit this time was garishly ill-matching and the black top yelded no shape to the contours of the body when seen on TV. Just about her only saving grace were the bits where she showed an almost total disregard for the position of her skirt up around her waist.

There was little chance to build any momentum with the audience here; no crowd pleasing collaborative moments arranged with backstage; no consideration to much of anything really. Only an impatience and intolerance in every sight of a production hand.

So instead of a proud finishing flourish to inspire, we cut abruptly to 66's 'new' usurping ploy - the official tease babe starting early (something they dropped years back* when all teases used to start at 9.30). A babe capable of the most unique subtle and bold eroticism was cast off to get 10 more minutes of an unmoving stick-up-the-back generic blonde with electric tape over her nips - while leaving dead air on the two other streams!

66 you're creating these segments' own downturn by deliberate action - just so you can be totally risk averse. And you wonder why guys don't return to interact! Do you want no more of Eve's TV tease money? Has it got too hot to handle for you, because why else throw away what has been built with such signalling to the audience not to bother anymore? This was just tiresome for the regular interactor and troublingly weak all round.


* An admission you got this wrong 66?!

say what you want about evelyns stockings but a cock blocker or not i like them, maybe you should show evelyn some respect pal

^ kent there was no disrespect towards Evelyn in that post, I'm not a fan of tights especially on Evelyn because her leg's are beautifully sexy without them, but each to their own regards to outfit preference.