Gigi Petite - Studio 66 Tease/Nights Chat, Caps and Vids

(25-02-2019 00:41 )mrmann Wrote:  ^^ It's mostly the doing of the scared producers who are petrified of the mere glimpse of vagina. This is why she's on a bed set all night. Sometimes we'll get something decent from the women, but in general everything is tame and constrained because of nervous producers.

Yeah but come on Gigi can still put on her underwear & stand move about do some sexy postions & be topless & all that stuff like.

But as i said she decides not to do these simple things that are done & expected on a nightshow until 3am

Im pretty sure after tonight everyone will be saying she pointless on a nightshow.
Unless some folks are easily pleased no doubt they are.

Jesus wept this is one of the worst nights I've ever seen, just no movement, not just gigi but poppy too both are perve cam catering, I don't know if it's girls as surely gigi chose not to wear underwear or what, but this is abysmal and we've got just under 3 hours left of this garbage side view and nipple covered as and when she does show them which is next to never, at least last week she showed her bombs but to come back and have same outfit and cover up this time is piss taking.

I'd rather her stick to days as this is just not worth it all its night show, not a day show with perve cam.

Yeah this channel has really gone downhill then again we have been saying this for ages now.

Gigis show tonight is even a hell of alot worse than the one last week which that one was not great to begin with..

Well technically it's still a teasehour and not a nightshow, and she can do whatever the hell she wants.
As long as the calls come in and as long as the pervcam rakes in money, it's not gonna change soon.
Personally I see no issues with it, if I don't like I just watch something else.

(25-02-2019 08:58 )MadsS Wrote:  Well technically it's still a teasehour and not a nightshow, and she can do whatever the hell she wants.
As long as the calls come in and as long as the pervcam rakes in money, it's not gonna change soon.
Personally I see no issues with it, if I don't like I just watch something else.

The problem with that theory that if it is a tease hour as soon as 11pm comes they should be able to move about what ever they are wearing and after 12am they can definately move about and show anything if their legs are shut. I go back to what I said about Babestation a year ago
THIS IS A WEB SHOW NOT A WEBCAM SHOW

Since I said this BS have adopted the 2 people doing webcam behind the scenes instead of on the screen

But since it's still considered a tease hour she does not have to show anything or move about when the clock strikes midnight.
I guess that's the reason she still calls it teasehour rather than nightshow, even though it ends at 3am.
She is busy on the phones regardless, and apparently her callers do not ask her to move about.

(25-02-2019 11:27 )MadsS Wrote:  But since it's still considered a tease hour she does not have to show anything or move about when the clock strikes midnight.
I guess that's the reason she still calls it teasehour rather than nightshow, even though it ends at 3am.
She is busy on the phones regardless, and apparently her callers do not ask her to move about.

Tease show or full on night show MOVE!!!!!!!!

GG has the poorest idea imaginable of what a tease/nightshow is. (She couldn't give two hoots about the distinction so it's totally irrelevant.) She gained her crowd on days by breaking the rules and then stopped all action (or was stopped) when she'd achieved that aim in November last. Now she is going to ride that and her new chest for all they are worth.

Of course she can do what the hell she wants; no one is suggesting otherwise. The question is are we fans of a babe or of the babeshow format because I would suggest that what GG and others like her are doing is not good for the sustainability of the shows. If a large enough general sustaining audience is to be maintained I'd argue the shows have to be basically entertaining when guys are not spending. That keeps them interested for the next time when they can spend. Without that the shows pool of spenders just dwindles away in gradual fashion. This is part of what's been happening for years in my eyes. And too many babes wont step up to their responsibilities in that direction preferring to ignore the broader results of their actions and take the 'I can do the hell as I like' line.

GG's just another babe who has such a low opinion of the shows and the value of punters' money. Guys are selling themselves short with her but that's their perogative. And as I say the only trouble comes when other babes see the attitude works and copy it. So if guys want more shows like GG's they should keep spending with her and reap their rewards.

That was a rubbish show , to just sit there doing nothing showing some side boob for hours is not good enough for night show, if that's all she's going to do now then stay on days please and let the night girls have more work, I thought she had such potential last year but looks like another girl who is happy doing just enough a d not wanting to take it next level, her night shows are not going to grow 66 so they should not be using her,

(25-02-2019 11:46 )ShandyHand Wrote:  GG has the poorest idea imaginable of what a tease/nightshow is. (She couldn't give two hoots about the distinction so it's totally irrelevant.) She gained her crowd on days by breaking the rules and then stopped all action (or was stopped) when she'd achieved that aim in November last. Now she is going to ride that and her new chest for all they are worth.

Of course she can do what the hell she wants; no one is suggesting otherwise. The question is are we fans of a babe or of the babeshow format because I would suggest that what GG and others like her are doing is not good for the sustainability of the shows. If a large enough general sustaining audience is to be maintained I'd argue the shows have to be basically entertaining when guys are not spending. That keeps them interested for the next time when they can spend. Without that the shows pool of spenders just dwindles away in gradual fashion. This is part of what's been happening for years in my eyes. And too many babes wont step up to their responsibilities in that direction preferring to ignore the broader results of their actions and take the 'I can do the hell as I like' line.

GG's just another babe who has such a low opinion of the shows and the value of punters' money. Guys are selling themselves short with her but that's their perogative. And as I say the only trouble comes when other babes see the attitude works and copy it. So if guys want more shows like GG's they should keep spending with her and reap their rewards.

Very well put Shady but the studio 66 management can do something about it just like BS did last year