Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

^

(01-08-2017 09:48 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  SNIP
BS have stated, in writing, that they are going to be 'BIGGER and NAUGHTIER than ever!' after the EPG change, and, as we know, their 'word is their bond'...

Still, you never know, maybe they'll surprise us?

Well, I suppose that losing three channels counts as a surprise?

100 just to go topless on the webshow

Well that's it. These shows are finished. Webshow has become a cam show. Eventually these shows will all be glorified camshows.

bound to happen wasnt it ?, lets see how long they last now with this latest tightening of the noose round their own necks

TV is merely to advertise the cam service.

(07-08-2017 16:22 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  100 just to go topless on the webshow

They forgot the charge for 'showing ankle'.



Seriously, though, WTF?

See how they have written the noughts in the shape of teardrops, to represent the grief of all the freeloaders

Well it's been a great ride but all good things come to an end. Eventually nightshows will be dayshows and nightshows will no longer exist. Thanks BS thanks awfully.

For some time now, they have been reducing what is shown, as an attempt to get people to pay up front in order to see anything; This seemed to be done in steps, gradually, presumably checking that sufficient numbers of people were willing to put up with it, and stump up, while being relatively cautious that such moves didn't actually harm the bottom line - is it just me, or have these actions, and the resultant rate of deterioration (from a viewer's perspective), been accelerating, greatly, of late?

Then there's the removal of channels from their (seemingly) previously lucrative FV near-monopoly.

Are these the 'death throws' of Lamestation? Cut costs, grab as much money while they still can, before it goes 'tits up' (no pun intended ). Or, simply further 'proof' that those currently in charge genuinely don't know what they are doing, and are just making it up as they go along?

Although, I'm amazed that they have remained on-air over the last few years, so poor, generally, have the shows been (since, say, 2013 onwards), so there must be people out there who are willing to put up with all manner of guff, thus keeping them in business? At some point, though, something's got to give... right?

(07-08-2017 18:47 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  For some time now, they have been reducing what is shown, as an attempt to get people to pay up front in order to see anything; This seemed to be done in steps, gradually, presumably checking that sufficient numbers of people were willing to put up with it, and stump up, while being relatively cautious that such moves didn't actually harm the bottom line - is it just me, or have these actions, and the resultant rate of deterioration (from a viewer's perspective), been accelerating, greatly, of late?

Then there's the removal of channels from their (seemingly) previously lucrative FV near-monopoly.

Are these the 'death throws' of Lamestation? Cut costs, grab as much money while they still can, before it goes 'tits up' (no pun intended ). Or, simply further 'proof' that those currently in charge genuinely don't know what they are doing, and are just making it up as they go along?

Although, I'm amazed that they have remained on-air over the last few years, so poor, generally, have the shows been (since, say, 2013 onwards), so there must be people out there who are willing to put up with all manner of guff, thus keeping them in business? At some point, though, something's got to give... right?

Totally agree. Its definitely being sped up. But part of this is simply down to more of the babes being unwilling to show anything unless on pervcam. So the more that do that the more will copy. The more people that buy into it the more it'll carry on.