Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

We wait a whole month for jada only for babestation to ruin it by putting her in a split screen or share a set with another babe!
Major turn off for me personaly I will not be calling unless she's solo!
Fuckin BS have no clue what the fans want!
We should let babestation know on twitter as I am now!

(07-01-2017 23:04 )ryuken Wrote:  BS are making a huge mistake by putting Nicole, who is possibly the biggest star in the industry right now,

Seriously? What a sorry indictment of the industry that is

(08-01-2017 09:39 )Doddle Wrote:  

(07-01-2017 23:04 )ryuken Wrote:  BS are making a huge mistake by putting Nicole, who is possibly the biggest star in the industry right now,

Seriously? What a sorry indictment of the industry that is

I'm really sorry I never meant any offence, and I guess it does come across very hyperbolic.

I only said she's currently the "biggest" star because she won Ultimate Babe and Newcomer 2016.

great line up of girls,wasted again by babestation with their shoddy running of the camera and direction

If only it was babestation of old. Nicole and Jada could oil it up together what a sight that would have been

Great line-up last night,but sadly all they really highlighted is how much a negative effect the decision to scrap/remove the Dutch license is having on the look of the final product.

(08-01-2017 09:54 )ryuken Wrote:  

(08-01-2017 09:39 )Doddle Wrote:  

(07-01-2017 23:04 )ryuken Wrote:  BS are making a huge mistake by putting Nicole, who is possibly the biggest star in the industry right now,

Seriously? What a sorry indictment of the industry that is

I'm really sorry I never meant any offence, and I guess it does come across very hyperbolic.

I only said she's currently the "biggest" star because she won Ultimate Babe and Newcomer 2016.

Put like that, I understand your reasons, but Good Grief all the same

^ That's OK Doddle. I'm just as frustrated with the industry as a whole too.

(07-01-2017 21:45 )ShandyHand Wrote:  You state: "whatever happens Ofcom's wish is to maintain the existing broadcasting arrangements with the EU". I presume you are paraphrasing Sharon White's words here:
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/lat...unications ?

Yes.

(07-01-2017 21:45 )ShandyHand Wrote:  She also states that this would dependent on their regulators allowing us to continue to broadcast to them from this country under our rules.

That's the problem exactly. Who knows what the EU will decide?

(07-01-2017 21:45 )ShandyHand Wrote:  It's interesting that Ofcom are now seemingly willing to let BS continue to use their non-Ofcom licence, when they could potentially stop them.

Babestation is just one dot of paint on a much bigger picture. The many channels licensed by Ofcom which broadcast to Europe is a much greater concern to them than the minor detail of Babestation.

(09-01-2017 15:20 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(07-01-2017 21:45 )ShandyHand Wrote:  It's interesting that Ofcom are now seemingly willing to let BS continue to use their non-Ofcom licence, when they could potentially stop them.

Babestation is just one dot of paint on a much bigger picture. The many channels licensed by Ofcom which broadcast to Europe is a much greater concern to them than the minor detail of Babestation.

Oh absolutely, Ofcom have much bigger priorities all round at the mo. But this is the thing isn't it. Their focus might be said to have taken on a more correct prospective. Can you imagine Ofcom bothering to set up almost an entire rule book of their own for the channels if they had it on the schedule these days? Some much more proportional and pragmatic method would surely be found.