Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion

(24-11-2016 14:35 )mrmann Wrote:  What happened to all those pictures that Superhanz95 posted that most of the mods and everyone else thanked? Were they pictures of her nude session on the bed, or different pictures?

They were dead, so were removed.

Amazing ass...Great tits too

(10-06-2016 00:57 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  Kimberley Jenner :

(21-11-2016 10:18 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(21-11-2016 03:23 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(21-11-2016 03:01 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  Jimmy, the boring (IMO) naked stuff has arrived, so you should be pleased, now.

Not necesarily,i will admit that i do expect some nudity most nights i watch,but i also have come to realise that in these tame times some people have lowered their expectations on how much nudity they are satisfied by,all im saying is that both S66 and Sophia catered for only one type of fetish which although appeals to some,by its very nature is does not really visually look like a nightshow,in summary sessions which involve no nudity should be on days in my view.

The babeshows are not mainly about nudity!!!!!! They are mainly about phonesex and not as you obsess about, visual simulation. There are no set rules on what a babeshow babe like Sophia has to do, just guidance on what they can & cant do and neither are there set expectations on what a nightshow is and contains. Disagree that babeshow babes who don't go naked should be forced off nights. The main thing that will stop a babeshow babe from appearing on nights will be their call stats

As for Sophia last night, I also thought she was babe of the night with a great show. Looked fantastic in & out of her catsuit and each stint she did was top drawer.

More of the same on Thursday Sophia

Of course its about visual stimulation. ...its TV. It's all about visual.

no the babeshows are mainly about phonesex, if it was all about visual stimulation the channels would go bust within minutes as they wouldn't make money. the babeshows are about INTERACTING with the babes on screen and you cant do that by just watching, you interact by CALLING THE BABES!!! and having phonesex. yes there has to be some visual stimulation to get people calling but the babeshows are mainly about phonesex and the phones are probably the main source of income for the babeshows

as for Sophia, so far a very good show from her tonight

Ahem. As a general point only........
Speaking as a regular caller down the years........
I would and will only call if the level of visual stimulus is sufficient. Currently the visual stimulus is not there right across the channels.
This in combination with excessively expensive call costs is putting me off.

#just saying

Thought Sophia was the best nightbabe on last night with a top drawer show including some nice naked Sophia action flashing her landing strip. Hope she's on again soon

^ Well, according to you Rammy.....

(25-11-2016 01:18 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  the babeshows are mainly about phonesex

So, how do you know she had a good night?

You're not judging things on a visual-only basis are you?

Well that was much more recognizable as a nightshow,hope she performs like that next time she appears.

If it was just about phonesex, we wouldn't need them to be on tv. They could go back to just providing a service via those seedy phonesex telephone numbers you used to see plastered all over telephone boxes, if anyone can remember those?

I never said it was just about phonesex, I said the babeshows are MAINLY about phonesex. There has to be some visual stimulation but they are mainly about phone sex as that is how people interact with the babeshow babes