Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

For me Freeview needs to be Clare, Lola, Kandi at her best and Hannah Martin. If they switch to Cougars for awhile, my ideal is Lucy Gresty

^ I agree that actual figures are important. But upholding a certain figure as more important than it actually is can also be misleading.

I hope I can explain what I mean by outlining the sources as promised, as well as saying where I went wrong in my initial post:

Digital take-up at 96%:
http://informitv.com/2015/02/01/fall-in-...ion-homes/

Freeview in 76% of homes:
https://www.freeview.co.uk/news-and-blog...today.html
This figure is percentage of those homes with TVs.

^ The inform piece is also where I got the 61%, 34% and 30% figures from:

Admittedly, with the "Sky" figure I used the wrong term, I should have said Pay-TV (or at least "those with access to Sky's basic programming", although I doubt some would have been happy with that either). The basis of the context of the remark was to look at how many guys could watch their babe channels via what is often classed as Sky packages on this board (when they are in actual fact FTA satellite broadcasts)... whether that be via Cable, Sky, or other paid methods.

Quote:Ofcom reports that just over six in ten adults receive pay-TV. The proportion has risen from 58% in 2013 to 61% in 2014.

I was trying to emphasise that there are other paid methods of picking up the "Sky" channels including the babe ones in addition to just having a Sky box/subscription.

The other figures are for adults not homes.

Quote:Around half of all adults in the United Kingdom access multichannel television at home through an aerial, with 34% using only Freeview. This compares to 30% using only satellite and 14% using only cable.

My garbled point was that the total figures for Sky and FV figure would be misleading if considered in isolation. Many homes have both. It is the FV only households that 66 are surely targeting the most.

34% or 40%, depending on what your talking about - neither is a minor figure. And, as winsaw says, it's what 66 are after.

(01-04-2016 15:55 )greenray Wrote:  For me Freeview needs to be Clare, Lola, Kandi at her best and Hannah Martin. If they switch to Cougars for awhile, my ideal is Lucy Gresty

Freeview surely needs variety. Not just a certain set of girls.

so victoria jennifer and rebbecca not really a choice given BS lineup for tonight

(01-04-2016 13:59 )old compton Wrote:  The picture quality was definitely better than 2 of the Babestation channels at least - in fact it was much better.

Agreed. I was pleased to see the good Studio 66 picture. Babestation only has 1 channel out of 3 with an acceptable picture quality.

(01-04-2016 17:30 )treacleking Wrote:  

(01-04-2016 13:59 )old compton Wrote:  The picture quality was definitely better than 2 of the Babestation channels at least - in fact it was much better.

Agreed. I was pleased to see the good Studio 66 picture. Babestation only has 1 channel out of 3 with an acceptable picture quality.

i would like to no how they got is like that as when TVX used that stream the picture was not that.

I looked at my listing and see it's only nights on FV for St66
One slot still shows up as being allocated for Sin TV broadcasts I'm still surprised that it has this allocation, and I wonder if & when it might change hands or disappear

Nothing sums up st66's "exemplary" professionalism better than Cara, visibly agitated, yelling "guuuuys!" after waiting ~10 minutes for someone to quit the music so that she could end her TV shift properly.

(01-04-2016 21:53 )euleri Wrote:  Nothing sums up st66's "exemplary" professionalism better than Cara, visibly agitated, yelling "guuuuys!" after waiting ~10 minutes for someone to quit the music so that she could end her TV shift properly.

Totally agree, where had everybody gone? I know they are out celebrating 7 years but do they not have any contingency?