Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(05-01-2016 02:09 )winsaw Wrote:  They are employing less staff behind the scenes using less equipment so the channel is cheaper,

So are Babestation. They have said so in their annual report. They cut back on staff. All the channels have cut back on costs. Red Light needed less staff when they went from 4 channels down to 2. They cut back too. Only Xpanded don't seem to have cut back.

(05-01-2016 02:13 )winsaw Wrote:  The difference back then was that the girls could have interaction so it made for a good watch

Well you can't blame the channels for that. I'm sure they would all reintroduce those kind of shows in an instant if they could.

Yes Ofcom have cost the channels bigtime by effectively banning the 241s we used to see.

(05-01-2016 02:26 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:09 )winsaw Wrote:  They are employing less staff behind the scenes using less equipment so the channel is cheaper,

So are Babestation. They have said so in their annual report. They cut back on staff. All the channels have cut back on costs. Red Light needed less staff when they went from 4 channels down to 2. They cut back too. Only Xpanded don't seem to have cut back.

Some things never change do they every time someone points out how you have got something wrong you take what they said out of context by editing the quote and then you try and twist it round to make your point of view even though it's the complete opposite to what you were saying a few posts earlier ,
As you know agree with me that the channels have in fact cut costs how can you possibly therefore argue that it's more expensive to run a channel with two girls on it than it was a channel with one girl on each,
The whole Crooks of the original argument was that if they try and produce a product that is more appealing to people then they are more likely to grow rather than having to continually shrink their business to match a smaller margin available in the sector, u seam to be missing this point

(05-01-2016 02:34 )monnahan Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:13 )winsaw Wrote:  The difference back then was that the girls could have interaction so it made for a good watch

Well you can't blame the channels for that. I'm sure they would all reintroduce those kind of shows in an instant if they could.

I don't blame the channels for that was just making the point that in the past 2 girls on a bed was wanted as it would lead to great interaction but as that can't happen now 2 on a bed is not wanted, so I feel that the poster I was replying to is wrong to compare the past with now

(05-01-2016 02:49 )winsaw Wrote:  As you know agree with me that the channels have in fact cut costs how can you possibly therefore argue that it's more expensive to run a channel with two girls on it than it was a channel with one girl on each,

That wasn't my argument.

What I said was "Shandyhand's talking about the 'multiple presenter channel' which costs more to run than a single presenter channel".

I didn't say it's more expensive to run a channel with two girls on it than it was a channel with one girl on each.

Studio 66 TV Camera Work 101: Always remember that it's extremely important to ensure that at least 20% of the screen isn't used to frame babes, but also on recording beds at all times.

(05-01-2016 02:16 )forumdude Wrote:  And kerrie 'strip me naked and cover me in oil' lee is the one leaving....

Let's be optimistic and hope Studio 66 can get her to stay. Although since she apparently said on twitter that she doesn't like the work it probably won't be easy to persuade her.

(05-01-2016 02:09 )winsaw Wrote:  You are quite wrong the channel is cheaper to run than before because they still inploy the same number of girls just show them on less channels so the argument on two girls wages just does not wash,

Again, that is NOT what I said.

I said "Shandyhand's talking about the 'multiple presenter channel' which costs more to run than a single presenter channel, as they are paying 2 girls wages instead of 1.".

My words are clear and easy to understand.

Your point is completely different and nothing to do with the point that I was making.

(05-01-2016 03:21 )mrbates59 Wrote:  

Studio 66 TV Camera Work 101: Always remember that it's extremely important to ensure that at least 20% of the screen isn't used to record babes, but on recording beds at all times.

But isn't that space at the bottom of the image the place where the onscreen graphics are positioned?