Kerrie Lee - Studio66 - Chat & Discussion (Only)

^well, there is not much to add to what you wrote .... last night I watched the first hour of the show (past 23.30, i don't like ella), and, of course kerrie and victoria were on the same set, while Ella was alone, doing her usual domination-show...."to each their own", sure,i'm just saying that it was quite predictable...

P.S. to be honest, after 00.30 i went to sleep, so i don't know if , during the night , something changed

good show from Kerrie-Lee last night both solo & when she was with Victoria. she is at her best when solo, so hope next time she's on, Kerrie-Lee is the solo babe

S66 are failing consistently to get the best out of Kerrie.
Not good enough S66. Not good enough.
It is patently obvious she is infinitely better solo.

^ I think they know that. I think it's also fairly obvious that they think they can only accommodate an 'always solo' for those who have it in their contract that they must be! The rest have to make do with what they get.

^ Peckingorderitis .

(09-12-2015 08:15 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ I think they know that. I think it's also fairly obvious that they think they can only accommodate an 'always solo' for those who have it in their contract that they must be! The rest have to make do with what they get.

And of course word gets round amongst the ladies that that is something they can negotiate when they're hired. LDM is no idiot so I'm sure she'll have that clause; going to be a nightmare for whoever does the scheduling.

What it means is that the new girls who are on the up (the likes of Kerrie) and there genuine stars who have been there a while (Claire and Kandi) could get a bit hacked off in the end if not only are they always stuck as a duo but the number of shifts reduce as well.

I suspect (as is rumoured) that if S66 wages have gone down they've had to incentivise in other ways and guaranteeing have a channel to their own means the lady can maximise commission.

Unintended consequence I believe they call it....

(09-12-2015 08:33 )snookered147 Wrote:  ^ Peckingorderitis .

Succinctness personified snookered! (Thanks for making me look the windbag I am! )

Hairbald you're spot on. Pretty sure, the 'top' babes are now using this when negotiating their contracts as a way of making sure they stay that way. Of course all babes that have been around 5 minutes will soon be asking for it in their terms. Another unsustainable situation. They can't all get it.

(09-12-2015 10:10 )hairbald Wrote:  

(09-12-2015 08:15 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ I think they know that. I think it's also fairly obvious that they think they can only accommodate an 'always solo' for those who have it in their contract that they must be! The rest have to make do with what they get.

And of course word gets round amongst the ladies that that is something they can negotiate when they're hired. LDM is no idiot so I'm sure she'll have that clause; going to be a nightmare for whoever does the scheduling.

What it means is that the new girls who are on the up (the likes of Kerrie) and there genuine stars who have been there a while (Claire and Kandi) could get a bit hacked off in the end if not only are they always stuck as a duo but the number of shifts reduce as well.

I suspect (as is rumoured) that if S66 wages have gone down they've had to incentivise in other ways and guaranteeing have a channel to their own means the lady can maximise commission.

Unintended consequence I believe they call it....

exactly that....

Enjoyed kerrie-lee as always last night, lively & entertaining in each stint she did

Kerrie looks a lot better than she did a year ago, she's got a pretty face, nice big tits and she has beefed up a bit although she's still a bit on the thin side, she's certainly a good performer though