Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 12 Vote(s) - 3.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

Author Message
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 99,875
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 249
Post: #3881
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(19-07-2015 17:24 )Joey 27 Wrote:  
(19-07-2015 15:28 )SOCATOA Wrote:  Will the babes be paid all the money they are owed? Just hope they aint depending on it to pay their rentSadSad Will they get paid some of the money they are owed? Hostel time methinksSadSadSad
I doubt they will go bankrupt even if they aren't paid what they are "owed", two years ago i wasn't paid in full for a month and i worked far harder than them and for far less money but i survivedRolleyes

for once agree joey. most babes do webcam shows and other work away from s66. also quite a few sintv babes have already got other channels, so they will be fine even if they don't get the money from sin

Piper Niven Superfan
(This post was last modified: 19-07-2015 20:44 by Rammyrascal.)
19-07-2015 20:44
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
admiral decker Offline
Seeker of truth and justice
*****

Posts: 1,582
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 83
Post: #3882
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(19-07-2015 11:55 )Pixel Wrote:  I'm wondering whether these promises to pay people are just a way to fob them off and deflect legal action until they can liquidate the company? Once the company is gone then creditors have nothing to claim money from. That's what any failing company would do and is the main reason limited liability companies are set up.

Looking on the bright side, perhaps they are attempting to pay people in order to salvage their credibility and start again. However, as Elgar said, this will be a substantial sum. I can't think of another reason why they would be genuinely attempting to pay creditors, when the alternative is to dissolve the company and disappear into the night. Therefore I remain deeply sceptical.

This is an interesting post by Pixel. I must admit I've been wondering too if the promises to pay everyone might turn out to be empty promises.

Loaded Magazine is a recent example of the kind of liquidation Pixel is speaking of. After the Loaded TV fiasco built up a lot of debt, the Loaded publishing company was suddenly liquidated. Those going without pay wondered why the magazine was still being published, but another company had been formed so they could carry on with the magazine as though nothing had happened. In this case, the liquidated company was genuinely insolvent though, which is an important point.

Yes, perhaps they are attempting to pay people in order to salvage their credibility and start again. That's certainly possible. But there is another reason why they would be genuinely attempting to pay creditors, which is that perhaps the company is not insolvent at this time. Although they are clearly in a bad way financially, perhaps they are not actually insolvent yet. I mean if they have monies due to them which could be used to pay their debtors, then liquidating the company now could make the directors personally liable for the company's debts.

The principle of limited liability only works to protect directors from being responsible for debts if all the rules of running a limited liability company are followed, and this includes not liquidating the company before doing everything possible to pay its debts. A wrongful liquidation, leaving people unpaid who really could have been paid, would only make the directors personally liable for those same debts.
19-07-2015 20:53
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
towny Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 269
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 13
Post: #3883
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
Surprised it lasted as long as it did. Terrible channel. The girls who are owed have themselves to blame. They should have a sense by now whether or not a channel is doing well and certainly the headline 'launch girls' who could work anywhere, like Kara, should always have asked for money up front. If they didn't, they're fools. They won't see a penny of their money.
19-07-2015 21:13
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pixel Offline
Junior Poster
**

Posts: 62
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 7
Post: #3884
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(19-07-2015 20:53 )admiral decker Wrote:  <snip>
The principle of limited liability only works to protect directors from being responsible for debts if all the rules of running a limited liability company are followed, and this includes not liquidating the company before doing everything possible to pay its debts. A wrongful liquidation, leaving people unpaid who really could have been paid, would only make the directors personally liable for those same debts.

Thanks Admiral, I'd forgotten that crucial point above. As Sin TV will shortly receive their revenue from the phone company for the first quarter of trading they won't be able to present themselves as insolvent, so they are obliged to use those funds to pay their creditors. Hopefully that means that most girls will receive at least something.

However, Sin may have obligations to banks and other investors, in which case I believe they come first ahead of suppliers (i.e. the babes).
19-07-2015 21:29
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Goodfella3041 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,584
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 61
Post: #3885
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
I just read the last few pages of posts and a horrifying thought came to me...

Sin TV sounds to me like something that would happen if a bunch of us disgruntled Forum members -- dissatisfied with the current state of the babeshows -- said, "F**k it! We can do a better job than them!" ... and started our own Babe Channel.

It has all the hallmarks of someone thinking that everyone else is stoopid and trying to be too cute. "Hotter girls! Better sets! What could possibly go wrong???"

Too many well-intentioned innovations, too quickly ... before slipping on the painfully obvious banana skin that a more experienced operator knows how to avoid.

It's a cautionary tale. I withdraw my investment. You guys are on your own...! Big Grin
(This post was last modified: 19-07-2015 22:31 by Goodfella3041.)
19-07-2015 22:31
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DB83 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,483
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 17
Post: #3886
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
^^ There is one good reason why they would not want to go in to administration - that is the legal term - at this stage.

They still nurture hopes of making a comeback. Official insolvency could well mean that Ofcom recalls the licence and then that really is it.

But that could be taken out of their hands. If one believes what one hears, they have not paid the rent hence moving out. But they are still liable for that rent and the landlord, or any other major creditor, could well take that action if not paid. That is why administrators are appointed - to look after the rights of all creditors. And, yes, there is a pecking order for settlement - secured creditors first, then preferential (Inland Revenue for PAYE etc.) next with unsecured, and that includes monies due to 'employees', at the bottom of the pile.
19-07-2015 22:34
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 99,875
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 249
Post: #3887
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(19-07-2015 21:29 )Pixel Wrote:  
(19-07-2015 20:53 )admiral decker Wrote:  <snip>
The principle of limited liability only works to protect directors from being responsible for debts if all the rules of running a limited liability company are followed, and this includes not liquidating the company before doing everything possible to pay its debts. A wrongful liquidation, leaving people unpaid who really could have been paid, would only make the directors personally liable for those same debts.

Thanks Admiral, I'd forgotten that crucial point above. As Sin TV will shortly receive their revenue from the phone company for the first quarter of trading they won't be able to present themselves as insolvent, so they are obliged to use those funds to pay their creditors. Hopefully that means that most girls will receive at least something.

However, Sin may have obligations to banks and other investors, in which case I believe they come first ahead of suppliers (i.e. the babes).

yep the banks and of course the taxman have priority over the sintv babes & staff with any money that comes into sintv now its shut down. hope the babes & sin staff can get some money once the taxman etc get what they are owed

I think a comeback is very very unlikely myself

Piper Niven Superfan
19-07-2015 22:40
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dave34 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,350
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 20
Post: #3888
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
^What about paying Sky to go they EPG. I'm sure that's not cheap to go on & what about Freeview they have only jest been put on there.

David is Darly's newest fan also a big fan of Charlie C ,Tiffany & Camilla, Kandi Kay & Rachel Taylor , Ruby Summer & Ree Petra, Kitty from Asian Connections & Jasmine from Asian Connections

top 4 channels as they are BS / Xpanded TV & Studio 66 TV & Asian Connections
(This post was last modified: 19-07-2015 23:25 by dave34.)
19-07-2015 23:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DB83 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,483
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 17
Post: #3889
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
^^ one would assume that is paid in advance for a contracted period and then renewed.

They have only been on the $ky EPG for a little over two months so I guess that renewal is not yet up.

Come the renewal and not paid = blank screen or removal from the EPG
19-07-2015 23:45
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Silent Majority Offline
Not any more
*****

Posts: 5,685
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 92
Post: #3890
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(19-07-2015 22:40 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  yep the banks and of course the taxman have priority over the sintv babes & staff with any money that comes into sintv now its shut down. hope the babes & sin staff can get some money once the taxman etc get what they are owed

I doubt the bank will be a major creditor. They may have a small overdraft facility on their working account but to get anything substantial they would need to present a credible business plan, with figures (not impossible, I suppose) and some sort of security. It's not beyond the bounds of possibility to get an unsecured loan but I suspect the interest rate would be prohibitive.

One of the first in the queue when they get their phone money in will, however, be the Vatman.
19-07-2015 23:55
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply