Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 28 Vote(s) - 2.82 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion

Author Message
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,973
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #341
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
^ 66 have definitely lightened up on their daytime clothing restrictions this year yes.
Gasson's anti-shopping list was drawn up at perhaps the worst time for their day babes in this regard. Ofcom had only just found the channel in breach for the second time in six months and 66 seemed to fear for their licence.

New bosses appear to have come onboard at this time too (as per Ofcom's licencing reports) and may have had an influence on this too.

In the last couple of months there seems some renewed confidence at the channel and they probably feel like they can get away with a little more now. (The simultaneous Cam and TV work adds of further incentive for the girls that do that.)

Maybe the strictest producer has left as well. Who knows...

In any event, I think there are indeed the merest signs that 66 moving in the right direction on both days and nights in terms of more revealing outfits being allowed... Praise be!

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
07-07-2015 12:35
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Raider007 Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 324
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 11
Post: #342
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
Think s66 are missing a trick. 3 girls on now all look very similar Blonde shoulder length hair. Variety would surely attract more calls.

My warning level is 0%
What am i doing wrong?
12-07-2015 16:45
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,824
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #343
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
I am enjoying the daytime output very much across the board actually. The daytime output imo is doing its job infinitely more effectively than nightshows.
Loving the daytime stuff right now Big Grin.

18-07-2015 15:10
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,973
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #344
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
The recent successes of day babes have stimulated them into remembering how to be cheeky with just that hint of naughtiness (such that they can get away with) to intrigue.

The decline in the night girls fortunes on the other have made them forget that they are there to be naughty with that element of cheekiness that always promise mores. Stop bothering to promise the camera and the calls stop coming.

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
18-07-2015 16:15
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Joey 27 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 7,110
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 60
Post: #345
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
I will never understand how some people can rate the dayshows better than the nightshows it is something that will always mystify me, i'd rather see Cara Brett on a nightshow laying static on a bed instead of laying static on a bed on a dayshow, because at least she goes topless on nights

I rarely comment on the dayshows these days because they are just to boring to watch, unless the babe is exceptionally good to look at like Charlie C, Cara Brett and Teejay Walker, good for you if you think the babes are fun to talk to on the phone though because it can't be their performance you are enjoying
18-07-2015 18:00
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Robot Devil Offline
The OFFICIAL Forum Curmudgeon

Posts: 5,941
Joined: Jul 2008
Post: #346
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
(18-07-2015 18:00 )Joey 27 Wrote:  I will never understand how some people can rate the dayshows better than the nightshows it is something that will always mystify me...

I'd say it's possibly due to days having genuine lookers on, whereas the night show 'talent' (for the most part) are inferior. It's a shame that so few of the current day girls are willing to 'graduate' to nights. There's waaaay too many average looking girls on nights now. Total turn-off.

MY GIRLFRIEND WAS AFRAID OF THE DARK... THEN SHE SAW ME NAKED AND NOW SHE'S AFRAID OF THE LIGHT
18-07-2015 18:08
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Joey 27 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 7,110
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 60
Post: #347
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
Agree with that partly, i'd rather watch Charlie C or Teejay Walker on a dayshow than Kerrie Lee, Victoria Roberts, Paige Turnah or Ella Jolie on nights, there are still a fair amount of "lookers" on BS but it doesn't stop people moaning, would people prefer to see them on dayshows instead? i'd still watch Tori if she did dayshows but i hope she never quits nightshows for dayshows, Btw i've only made 3 posts in this thread that just goes to show how much of a fuck i give about the dayshows
18-07-2015 18:26
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,973
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #348
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
(18-07-2015 18:08 )Robot Devil Wrote:  
(18-07-2015 18:00 )Joey 27 Wrote:  I will never understand how some people can rate the dayshows better than the nightshows it is something that will always mystify me...

I'd say it's possibly due to days having genuine lookers on, whereas the night show 'talent' (for the most part) are inferior. It's a shame that so few of the current day girls are willing to 'graduate' to nights. There's waaaay too many average looking girls on nights now. Total turn-off.

I agree that some daytime lookers transitioning across would improve things on nights no end; it's a shame but understandable really isn't it...

Why should a day girl bother to switch to actual nights when if they are that way inclined they can make the extra money through the cam systems that are around (if they are at BS or 66 they can do it at their channel). None of the downside of doing unsociable nights.

The fact that on cam they are not actually seen by as many people to be taking their clothes off is also a plus to some girls.

There is a lot less incentive all round to join an ailing night-time side of the industry than there once was.

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
18-07-2015 20:43
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,824
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #349
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
For me it is pretty simple.
The daytime product meets and exceeds my demands.
The nightshow product fails so to do.

The requirement to provide visual sexual stimulus in terms of performance is not there for the daytime babe. The importance of movement is also not such a concern.
Change of position and pose, the quality of the outfit, the ability to provide gentle tease and a positive, happy and bubbly demeanour are critical to the quality of a daytime babe imo.
Even the set does not seem so much of an issue to me because of the whole feel and purpose of daytime output.
A lot of daytime babes tick a lot of these boxes and are extremely attractive to boot. They seem chatty and vivacious without the pressure of having to act filthy and talk dirty.
Relaxing friendly conversation with Joe Public seems to be something that many of them thrive on.
I can understand that to the point where my temptation to ring babes on daytime is greater than to ring up on nights.
Because I don't go in with such high demands I can enjoy the babe, the relaxed conversation and indeed the whole situation a whole lot more Smile.

The issues I have with nightshows seem a world away.
The anti freeloader sentiment, the poor set variety and use, the lack of visual sexual stimulation, the cutting to logos, poor scheduling, annoying double babe stints, lack of imagination etc etc etc.

It all boils down to effectiveness.
Does the product deliver against reasonable expectation?
In my eyes daytime succeeds and nightshows fail.

(This post was last modified: 19-07-2015 08:35 by Snooks.)
18-07-2015 22:11
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Joey 27 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 7,110
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 60
Post: #350
RE: Daytime Shows - General Chat & Discussion
Perhaps dayshows should be 24/7 or maybe it would be better to just scrap nightshows instead? personally i don't think there are that many attractive daybabes except for maybe 4 or 5 babes, but i suppose its hard to tell when they are wearing outfits and laying static on a couch all day
18-07-2015 23:47
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply