Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

^I think you're either joking or a bit far off the mark

Even just claiming to work at a babe channel would be evidence enough to some people that a man was straight, so I don't think Afroman would need to do anything else to pretend, if this was the case. He could just claim that ofcom is the reason for the tame shows.

The taming of the channels IMO is due to both Ofcom and due to the producers possibly trying to convince us to pay to watch cam sessions without giving away too much on the TV. Also, in the past, Afroman has allowed some of the most daring sessions to take place, so...

if mrmann's telling you your posts are a bit far fetched then i think it's time to reassess your opinion and views!

(17-06-2015 17:36 )mrmann Wrote:  ^I think you're either joking or a bit far off the mark

Even just claiming to work at a babe channel would be evidence enough to some people that a man was straight, so I don't think Afroman would need to do anything else to pretend, if this was the case. He could just claim that ofcom is the reasons.

The taming of the channels IMO is due to both Ofcom and due to the producers possibly trying to convince us to pay to watch cam sessions without giving away too much on the TV. Also, in the past, Afroman has allowed some of the most daring sessions to take place, so...

I don't think that you quite follow: even if everyone took it for granted that someone was straight (when secretly they were not), there would be no issue there. The issue only manifests itself if the individual is covertly and surreptitiously using their position to undermine and sabotage the shows because of their real secret hatred.

(17-06-2015 17:38 )terence Wrote:  if mrmann's telling you your posts are a bit far fetched then i think it's time to reassess your opinion and views!

Logical consistency and evidential demonstrations are the only weapons that can alter my views.

^fair enough, but that all seems like way to much hard work. i'm out.

RUSure - can you please apply some logical consistency and evidential demonstration to your fantasy and see where you get to.

Terence can I nominate this thread for fantasy thread of the year please?

(17-06-2015 17:57 )SecretAgent Wrote:  RUSure - can you please apply some logical consistency and evidential demonstration to your fantasy and see where you get to.

Terence can I nominate this thread for fantasy thread of the year please?

It is you who is required to demonstrate that anything that I have written here is logically inconsistent. You do not have to agree with what I have written, but if you wish to comment upon it then please do so via the actual points raised.

So your logic is perfect unless I demonstrate its not? hmmm think I'll leave you to your own fantasy world. Enjoy your conspiracy theories! By the way I'll comment on anything I want. Your permission is not required or wanted

(17-06-2015 18:08 )SecretAgent Wrote:  So your logic is perfect unless I demonstrate its not? hmmm think I'll leave you to your own fantasy world. Enjoy your conspiracy theories! By the way I'll comment on anything I want. Your permission is not required or wanted

You happen to be on a Forum for discussion. If a member submits a post and we have something to say in response, then we ought to address the actual arguments put forward if we are saying that we do not agree with their points.

You may be new to forum discussions; but that is actually how they work... Otherwise disagreement is futile.

Been around longer than you sunshine but I'm happy to bow out and leave you to your own fantasies