Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

(04-06-2015 23:24 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  Lacey's bio on the website has been changed. It had said "No longer a sinner" but now it just has her name. It may mean nothing but maybe they aren't ruling out a return.

I can't see why they would take her back, after having sacked her. They aren't exactly short of girls.

(06-06-2015 07:35 )Charlemagne Wrote:  Whilst I welcome a few new faces on their nightshow, I can't help feeling that Aimee Luis was a reluctant participant.
It would be better to try the gorgeous Thai Mander.

First night nerves maybe?

(06-06-2015 10:27 )barracuda Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 23:24 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  Lacey's bio on the website has been changed. It had said "No longer a sinner" but now it just has her name. It may mean nothing but maybe they aren't ruling out a return.

I can't see why they would take her back, after having sacked her. They aren't exactly short of girls.

Depends why they sacked her? She wasn't there long enough to mess up

How do we know Lacey was sacked? Does anyone know that as a fact?

(06-06-2015 10:27 )barracuda Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 23:24 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  Lacey's bio on the website has been changed. It had said "No longer a sinner" but now it just has her name. It may mean nothing but maybe they aren't ruling out a return.

I can't see why they would take her back, after having sacked her. They aren't exactly short of girls.

True. but they are short of quality girls like Lacey so she would have had to done something quite bad for them to sack her

(06-06-2015 11:59 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  How do we know Lacey was sacked? Does anyone know that as a fact?

could be various reasons why lacey left sintv, just because she wasn't there that long doesn't mean she was sacked.

cant really say lacey was sacked unless you have proof or lacey herself has said she was

Lacey has always been terribly unreliable, so that may be the reason.

Was she unreliable at Sin? Bit hard to say when there was no schedule to check it against.

She even worked the morning show a couple of times after working all night and she was arguably one of their best babes, but it is a bit strange why she would leave Sin TV to join Xpanded even though Sin TV is just like Xpanded now

BTW Rammy why do you still defend girls you don't even watch? i wouldn't leap to the defence of Louise Porter if someone said she has been sacked, how many babes say they were sacked publicly anyway?

(06-06-2015 15:47 )Joey 27 Wrote:  She even worked the morning show a couple of times after working all night and she was arguably one of their best babes, but it is a bit strange why she would leave Sin TV to join Xpanded even though [undefined=undefined]Sin TV is just like Xpanded now[/undefined]

BTW Rammy why do you still defend girls you don't even watch? i wouldn't leap to the defence of Louise Porter if someone said she has been sacked, how many babes say they were sacked publicly anyway?

Bit harsh don't you think?

Sin may be a bit safe and people on this forum don't like multiple babes onscreen but at least Sin actually has more than one set and has a good camera quality (not blurred like Xpanded) plus they actually have a usable website.

Xpanded is the worst Babeshow ever and now they've taken over RLC which is kick in balls for the future of the Babe Channels.