Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

The other thing to consider is the girls they have; I don't think many of them are going to change their levels just because they are on internet rather than TV. Yes the likes of Tori are a little bit naughtier on webcam but its not exactly XXX. Lacey and Ella are a bit different however and would presumably do a more full on show.

Rules don't matter if the girls have specific limits although as Winsaw said, if its free to air then a return to 2010 standards or perhaps a little more, and at the right price, then you may have a package. The other thing of course is that because there may be no draconian restrictions the likes of Tiffany may get swept along to full open legged material - got to stay optimistic

Ella Mai - never figured why she gets so little praise. Possibly one of the most beautiful girls on the channels, a truly startling curvy body, and really very good on the phones (listens and is imaginative). This really could be her time to shine - I really hope so.

I totally agree with mr mystery in that it is no good judging this channnel until they are actually broadcasting on SKY. And to try and compare them to the other channels is wrong, simply because they are restricted by OFCOM where as Sin TV aren't. So it's obvious their shows are going to be better than the ones on the other channels.

My personal opinion is that the content on the web streams will be better than the TV channel, and you will have to pay to watch them. Otherwise anyone of any age could sign up and see it, plus if it was free they would never make any money.

(15-03-2015 14:09 )iluvcathy Wrote:  .... plus if it was free they would never make any money.

I generally agree with the whole post above, but it is worth speculating on this last bit.

If -- as some have suggested -- the TV channel is just the thin end of a wedge which resides primarily on-line, then couldn't this simply be the next step of the inevitable migration of adult chat from TV to the Web? In which case, couldn't they just replicate the old model -- i.e. monetize the content through the telephone rather than an internet pay barrier?

It's an interesting collection of girls that they have recruited too. There are veterans and then there are "lifers"! Is there any active girl that has clocked up more hours on screen than Tiffany? And Tori and Ree have been around the block, with time spent at Babestation, Bluebird and RLC. My point being... they know as well as anyone how the economics of these shows work, so if they were convinced to join then they must see something interesting in the new model that Sin-TV is trying to create. Hard to tell exactly what their endgame is, but maybe they have built a better mousetrap?

(N.b. I was tempted to include Lacey in that list, but I really get the sense that you could lead her on a long walk around the countryside with just a £10 note, a piece of string and a fishing rod ... soooo bad example!)

(15-03-2015 11:53 )DB83 Wrote:  If it is this channel-to-be's intent, as people suggest, that they will use the restricted tv channel to promote the website is that not against Ofcom's rules ? Something I felt that brought ETV on 945 down.

i was thinking more along the lines of the xpanded model where the channel gets you interested in the girls with out breaking ofcom rules then when you start looking for them online u find the web site, this don't break any advertising web show rule,
also girls can say stuff like i am going off screen now have a look at my twitter to see what i am up to, this again dose not break any web advertising rules,
ETV where to dim to realize there are ways round things that other channels are already doing,

i don't think it needs to be pay to view to get age restricted, they could work up to the level of BSU with no problem and most of the girls don't go to that level anyway

I am also a little concerned about the 'legality' of the website.

On all adult sites I visit, there is at least some reference to the ownership/responsibility. When I last looked at this one, I saw nothing. There is a contact form - Any website can include one of those - and that's it.

(15-03-2015 14:43 )DB83 Wrote:  I am also a little concerned about the 'legality' of the website.

On all adult sites I visit, there is at least some reference to the ownership/responsibility. When I last looked at this one, I saw nothing. There is a contact form - Any website can include one of those - and that's it.

They have their registered address on their whois record :

http://whois.icann.org/en/lookup?name=sin-tv.com

They dont have a 2257 statement, but this is not necessary if they are not using any US based companies for their site.

Since they are based in the UK, they will have to nofify ATVOD as it looks like they intend to provide on demand video.

If I was them I would have registered the site in The Netherlands like Babestation do, that way you can get around UK laws.

(15-03-2015 14:09 )iluvcathy Wrote:  I totally agree with mr mystery in that it is no good judging this channnel until they are actually broadcasting on SKY.

I'm glad that there are a few other Wet Blankets around What they've done so far has seemed really impressive, but it seems like there's a lot of climax from people going on now, when there might be a lot of anti-climax going on once the starting gun goes off proper

Or maybe something that seems too good to be true might turn out to be true, for a change?

(15-03-2015 11:53 )DB83 Wrote:  Maybe you should carefully looked at Lacy Lorenzo's vids in this topic. There is def something there that you can not see on UK Babeshow tv.

Yes I seen them but back in 2010 we also had slips but the golden word in all this is to say fuck all and to deny all knowledge of seeing it. Besides it's not the first time Lacey had had a slip that has gone unnoticed by you know who

(15-03-2015 13:41 )mr mystery Wrote:  Well i won't be making a judgement on the Sky TV channel, either good or bad until it actually broadcasts on Sky TV, i won't make judgements based on girls larking around when they are not governed by any TV or phone pay plus regulations etc .

It's a different kettle of fish when you are under pressure to stick to Ofcom's TV teleshopping rules and do enough to encourage callers to what it is when you have much more freedom to do what you want when testing .

Yes that's a very good point there mr mystery which a lot of us including myself have been rather guilty of brushing over. I suppose we're all just hoping that once this goes to air on SKY that it's as daring as the early Elite and Bluebird TV were as to be honest with you I think the channels generally play it a lot safer than what the actual ofcom rules allow them to these days. I'd like to think that Sin might be the one to push the channel to the absolute boundaries.

Well thanks to the above link, I let Google be my friend.

Not too hard to find out a little more about the guy who appears behind this venture. A teneous link to the babeshows but with his background(unless there is more than one person with a somewhat unique name) my opinion that he is just a 'front' has not changed.

Either that he is a total amateur not to register the website anonomosly.

(15-03-2015 19:35 )DB83 Wrote:  Not too hard to find out a little more about the guy who appears behind this venture. A teneous link to the babeshows but with his background(unless there is more than one person with a somewhat unique name) my opinion that he is just a 'front' has not changed.

There seems to be 2 people behind this venture, Mr Jevdet Orgen is one and Mr Cristinel Dumitru Prisacaru is the other .

Both are directors of the new company "Relativity Marketing Limited" info here http://companycheck.co.uk/company/093388...ecretaries .

Both men are also behind another new company "Honey Club TV Limited" info here http://companycheck.co.uk/company/093291...ecretaries .

The email address given on this forum by Relativity Marketing is, reception.hctv@gmail.com, shown in this post http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1617018
So i should think the hctv in the email address is short for Honey Club TV limited, so i assume Honey Club TV limited is associated with this new venture somewhere .

Honey Club TV has a twitter account, they are currently following Jevdet Orgen and Miss Posh from Sin TV https://twitter.com/HoneyClubTv1/following

In the bio it says they are a new adult channel launching soon .
Honey Club haven't tweeted for some time, i wonder if the channel was originally going to be called Honey Club TV and they have now decided to call it Sin TV ? .