Thread Closed 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 13 Vote(s) - 3.77 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?

Author Message
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 100,016
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 249
Post: #291
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
As well as Hannah Martin. Jennifer Keelings is having a break from s66 and as far as I know will be back.

this is the s66 night roster as I see it.

Clare Richards
Caty Cole
Ashley Emma
Adele Taylor
Hannah Martin
Jennifer Keelings
Sophia Knight
Lily Roma
Jennifer Jade
Jenna Hoskins
Yasmine James
Lucy Summers
Ruby Ryder (recently made her debut, no news on when she is back on)
Siri (does the occasional guest appearance)
Sophie Dee (does the occasional guest appearance)
Tanya Tate (does the occasional guest appearance)

also of course there's the s66 day babes that do tease hours or nightshows

Tashie Jackson
Fernanda
Sophia Lares
Lucy-Anne
Tara
Kiki Devine
Gemma Hiles
Cara Brett
Becky Roberts

agree regarding new sets making long serving babes fresh. an example of that is louise porter on babestation. she was a good babeshow babe but then once she started appearing on the new bs sets, she became one of their best babes

YOU STUPID BOOT!!!!
(This post was last modified: 30-04-2014 21:39 by Rammyrascal.)
30-04-2014 14:53
Find all posts by this user
hairbald Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,402
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 45
Post: #292
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
Thanks Rammy but I guess the "core" at the moment (i.e. more than one show per week) is really
Clare Richards
Adele Taylor
Lily Roma
Jennifer Jade
Jenna Hoskins
Yasmine James
Lucy Summers
Sophia Lares
Ashley Emma
Becky Roberts
Mica Martinez

Not a bad size of roster considering they have 3 channels but definitely just enough (11 girls x 2 nights per week = 22 slots per week. If you work on a girl per channel per night that is 21 slots available). Add in the occasional guest slot and Hannah coming back and you have just about enough to cover holidays.
30-04-2014 15:04
Find all posts by this user
Joey 27 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 7,110
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 60
Post: #293
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
you've forgot at least 3 models in your list rammy it seems you aren't a true S66 fanboy after all, this channel has taken a lot of flack recently and is mostly justified but imo RLC is the worst channel out of the big three right now
30-04-2014 15:19
Find all posts by this user
Robot Devil Offline
The OFFICIAL Forum Curmudgeon

Posts: 5,941
Joined: Jul 2008
Post: #294
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
^ Forget about the three he's forgotten; I don't know how you can possibly include SIX girls on that list. Three of them are part-timers- in other words, if Jamie is in need of cover, would he call them ? No. You included Ruby who, at present, was nothing more than a one-off. Sadly. And, you included Hannah & Jennifer, despite them not currently working for the channel. How ?!?!

MY GIRLFRIEND WAS AFRAID OF THE DARK... THEN SHE SAW ME NAKED AND NOW SHE'S AFRAID OF THE LIGHT
30-04-2014 15:42
Find all posts by this user
Snooks Away
Where's the cue ball going?
*****

Posts: 51,874
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #295
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
(30-04-2014 05:30 )TickleTheOrc Wrote:  Pretty much all the action on tonight's shows happened outside of the damned bedsets.

I think that is the case 99.9% of the time tbh.
Bed sets create laziness and limited movement options.
Bed set stints should be the rarity and not the norm.
Unfortunately things are completely the other way around.

30-04-2014 16:44
Find all posts by this user
TickleTheOrc Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,115
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 18
Post: #296
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
The only boon I can see from the bed sets is the recent addition of Lucy and Yasmine. They know how to move around and make full use of any bed. Showing off how flexible they are or generally moving around on the beds or shaking something other then a phone.

I mean I would say Mica's ass is comparable to Clare's ass the day before. Just Mica was either wearing Jeans or wiggling her ass laying down a on a bed. I think most of us were waiting on the jeans to come off and for Mica to show that white thong she had on off. All we got was mainly her laying on the bed and wiggling it periodically.

Basically, if you asset is your ass. Please make full usage of it. Hiding it or barely having the energy to move around shows on camera. If it isn't a reason for us to pick up the phones, its a reason for us to change the channel and watch another one.

I'm for visually stimulating shows.
30-04-2014 17:09
Find all posts by this user
Rob169 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 2,130
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 27
Post: #297
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
(30-04-2014 02:01 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  have to disagree about the comments about s66 tonight, think it's been pretty good, especially from Sophia and Mica

there's a supprise shocked
30-04-2014 17:59
Find all posts by this user
RatedR Offline
Bend the Rules
*****

Posts: 1,535
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation: 36
Post: #298
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
that's quite a small roster then, as you include porn stars that only guest. And I mentioned there has been less recently anyway. Summer is coming, holidays for the girls. Nothing needs to be defended or made to look better, as I'm not on the offensive, but they could surely do with a recruitment drive. You know I don't focus on negatives of the presenters Rammy. I just think it would help them a whole lot if they had say 5 new girls and a couple of experienced babes joining too. Otherwise they risk more nights with only 2 girls or less, as cancelations will always happen. (remember those cheeky monthly cycles that can make girls feel crap, no?)

When they were doing the guest slots they also had Jennifer Keelings, as you say, Hannah Martin, Gemma Massey etc on regularly. They could maybe try throwing some cash Tommie Jo's way. What about Stevie Lou? Candy Sexton? Reede Fox? Even if it's just a few shows they are all experienced with a following. I'm all for solutions and suggestions rather than just complaining. Maybe a few more people can chip in with positive ideas and maybe they'll take more notice (haha)

Ohh yes! It's good to be bad
(This post was last modified: 30-04-2014 18:32 by RatedR.)
30-04-2014 18:31
Find all posts by this user
Regenerated Offline
An Unearthly Child
*****

Posts: 20,881
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 184
Post: #299
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
Rammy that's surprising that you've included guest porn stars as part of the night show 'roster'. Guest stars carry no guarantees they'll either be on again or their performances will be memorable at all. While some guest appearances have been good (Sophie Dee) there's been some others that have been patchy at best - remember Jesse Jane's non event... Rolleyes

"WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT ACID HOUSE MUSIC?"
BABE OF THE MONTH FOR MAY: KARTEL KAY
30-04-2014 18:44
Find all posts by this user
RatedR Offline
Bend the Rules
*****

Posts: 1,535
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation: 36
Post: #300
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
I don't want to double post, but I have to add as well. There is a reason that people who mainly favour s66 do so. They have always been the best at glamour, focusing on that aspect. Which is great when things are going well and why their fans are devoted. But sometimes people like a bit more filth Tongue the girls I mentioned fit glamour and filth, sure there are more too, so it's not like there are no girls out there to try and lure in. That is why the porn guests go down well, pardon the pun.

Ohh yes! It's good to be bad
30-04-2014 18:45
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed