Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?

you will upset someone keep saying bad things about tonight's shows, this now is my least watched channel at the moment to be honest even pick storm over this crap

I would say we have witnessed the best and the worst of this channel tonight,Sophia has been excellent as usual,not sure whats happened to Lilly who is definately off form at the moment,but then we come to the worst offender Mica,who apart from her first stint,looks more like a daybabe whose been brought in to cover for someone rather than an established nightbabe which is what i thought she was,if this is the future having nightbabes putting on 2010 dayshows for the majority of their shift and then appearing for their last stint of the night virtually fully dressed and ready to leave then i think this channel demise may come sooner rather than later,i still think this channel has too many daybabes and when you see a nightbabe act like one you know their days are numbered

Mica's first set was ok with the alleyway and then sorta went boring after that.
Sophia is banging as usual, but she can't be a regular to save the shows or hold them up herself.
Lilly was the same old. Pretty, dolled up, interesting for the footies that call in, then nothing later on in the night.

Pretty much all the action on tonight's shows happened outside of the damned bedsets. If you're not going do anything on the bed set, but lay there wiggling the phone in front of the camera, they might as well have put a mannequin in your place. I'm starting to see why S66 only has 1 girls towards the end of the shows, there isn't a point in calling in at that point if the girl doesn't make any effort or give reason for us to pick up those phones.

It isn't rocket science on what we like.
Naked girls if possible. [Less clothing or skimpier clothing always looks good on pretty girls on tv]
Oil by the gallon [Oil always helps]
Interesting set usage [If their shifts were made so one half of the time be spent on non-bed sets, it could help get the girls blood pumping a little.]
Animated or active girls [Girls moving around tends to attract our eyeballs]
Themes [The alleyway could be enhanced even with a girl wearing a trenchcoat. Play to our fantasies, that is what you are trying to sell]

Pretty much, we're just asking for a god damned nightshow. I'm watching less and less of S66 lately, for damned good reason. Girls lounging for hours on end isn't a nightshow. Ply them with alcohol if you have to, give them a jumprope. I'm sure people would rather watch the girls exercising or stretching then just lying there like a dead fish twitching their fingers to wiggle a phone.

Yep, this is pretty much spot on. I've always described what is needed as; titillation, variety and good looks. Ironically S66 still have (for me) some of the best looking girls, but completely fail on the other two most of the time. None of this is rocket science.

(30-04-2014 05:30 )TickleTheOrc Wrote:  It isn't rocket science on what we like.

And that for me has always been the confusing part

If any channel were too make it compulsory that every show they deliver MUST include at least one key 'WOW' factor, they would obliterate all rivals and raise the bar.

Surely there's only one possible answer - lazy.

(30-04-2014 02:12 )Phonebook Wrote:  

(30-04-2014 02:06 )andyfletch25m Wrote:  Mica looks ready for home boots jeans and a some generic set of bra and panties wtf all she has to do is put on a top and grab her bag and she'd be off quicker then sophia knights panties, you gotta show some interest or some sense of enthusiasm even if its put on and the only time she actually does anything or talks a lot is when no ones on the phone and she does it for the crew. No worth it even for 46p you can only roll the dice so many times and come out with feck all.

I couldn't agree more mate. Mica's performances have been utter garbage for weeks. You have hit the nail on the head with the ready for home thing.

How people can still come on and defend her rank rotten displays is beyond me.

easy how some people can come on and defend her "rank rotten displays". they like what mica did in her show. this is one of my main annoyances on the forum. That some forum members don't like certain babeshow babes and each night this particular babe is on, they will go in her thread and really attack her and if anyone posts anything positive about this babe, they really have a go at the forum member who said it. basically saying you cannot post anything positive about a babe I don't like

an example of that happened in mica's thread last night. I posted a comment in mica's thread saying overall it was an improved performance to which phonebook replied saying "are you having a laugh? is he having a laugh?" fair enough forum members don't like certain babeshow babes as not everyone likes the same babe, but they should respect those that do like the babes they don't like and not have a go at the forum members that do like the babes when they say positive things and respect what they say

Don't think it's lazyness or what.... I just think that principal investors have decided not to invest on the channel anymore. And instead of selling it to people (other investors) who could relive the business, they tend to take out the maximum with minimum effort.

I don't know if that happens because a lack of new investors, or just because with Ofcom always keeping its vulture wings on the channel, the people who are running this channel now are afraid to spend more!!

But what I know is that lacking new investments, (new girls, new settings, daytime girls who turn REALLY in nightime girls etc...) this channel will definitely shut down. As the one we cannot mention on this forum!!!

That's all folks!!!!

Using oil
Getting naked
Energetic performances
The shower etc etc
How is that costly? It's more costly not using them surely?
How many shows have NONE of the above?
How many thanks do screen caps receive that DO include some of the "not rocket science" factors mentioned?
That's enough evidence for me.

I do see what your saying, and on that front your right.
My point is they're still a business, still here to make money, but unfortunately imo they're not getting the maximum from each show which is crazy.
So how does that happen? you touched on the point earlier "minimum effort" so that to me boils down to lazy and has nothing to do with Ofcom since the brilliant shows do happen, just not every night like they could or should.

I still think most of it has to do with the women not wanting to do more than lay on the beds, or do just one session where they stand etc. However, I think a small part of the problem comes from callers who don't want anything special. I can't imagine the producers mind too much filming POV here and there or doing something inventive, as we see this from time to time, but I think it's really the women being lazy and the boring callers.

75% laziness, and 25% boring callers who want to chat about how miserable their lives are, and want a woman to listen.

how big is their night roster now? Seems like it's smaller than it was. Hannah isn't on, but are there others missing?

Maybe some girls were always hit and miss, which to be fair can happen when it's mostly glamour girls, but maybe there was more choice so it was less noticeable. This is purely hypothetical, as I watch the girls I like, girls that excite, and have never really watched the ones that are taking all the flak. Which makes me think that maybe nothing has changed apart from there being less choice.

Personally I watch 66 alot less now because there is only 3 girls and the choice hasn't been great for me. Less porn stars, no Hannah. Caty has maybe been there so long that it always seems the same. New sets would probably make the long serving girls fresh again though.