Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Totally agree about the signing of Leigh Darby.
Would be nice to try and get some of the babes from xpanded or some daytime babes from the other channels.
Ally lou,Madison rose,Cali Garcia would be good signings and then mix them with new talent put it to a poll and hire the ones with most votes.
Signing Leigh is not the right way to go about it.

(21-09-2013 15:47 )KerrAvon Wrote:  To be honest, what the channels really need is NEW girls. BS made a big attempt at doing that a while back & I'd love to see them try again.

We all have our old favourites like Camilla, Tiffany, Paige, Charlene Hart, Reede (coming back next week) etc but let's face it, most have been round the block now (in babeshow terms). They could well be in their zimmer frames and fans will be crying for them to crawl back . Got to let them go sooner or later, no matter hard it is, and move on.

what they need to is find new ones that are a same quality as the ones they are replacing.

get the feeling if they had found a paige mk 2 or a camilla lookalike then we would not all be complaining.

but if jamie is struggling recruiting im sure bs is just the same or even worse cos i cant see them paying 5k a month even to the big guns

(21-09-2013 17:18 )HannahsPet Wrote:  what they need to is find new ones that are a same quality as the ones they are replacing.

get the feeling if they had found a paige mk 2 or a camilla lookalike then we would not all be complaining.

but if jamie is struggling recruiting im sure bs is just the same or even worse cos i cant see them paying 5k a month even to the big guns

Trouble is the 'quality' of babes is oh so subjective. Some prefer 'glamour girls' types, others the more 'girl next door'. Still enough about of both though, in my opinion.

One disadvantage the girls have now of establishing themselves in babeshow lore are they're in a more clamped down Ofcom era of the shows. Many of the old favourites made their name when they were allowed more expression. Babes these days don't have that advantage.

agree with you here kerravon. as you say not everyone likes the same type of babe. some like glamour girls, some like girl next door, some like curvy babes and so on. also agree babeshow babes these days have a disadvantage getting themselves established because of Ofcom is

(21-09-2013 15:28 )Jet-Fan Wrote:  

(21-09-2013 01:54 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(21-09-2013 01:22 )Jet-Fan Wrote:  I'm willing to bet money that by January 1st 2015 Babestation will have gone bust.

What the idiots at babestation don't realize is that they're doing the competition a favor by driving the likes of Camilla, Charlene Hart ect. to other channels and I'm betting that Tiffany will be next to jump ship.

The loss of the talent in the past year and now the hiring of Leigh Darby . . . . well the writings on the wall!

how do you know it was bs that drove Camilla, etc to other channels. have you heard it from themselves directly. Charlene had quit the shows altogether to pursue various things away from the babeshows and decided to return after people on twitter etc kept asking for her to be back on and presume the channel she is on now was the best deal for her. Camilla had been on bs for about 4-5 years so probably fancied a change

and how does the signing of leigh darby indicate the writing is on the wall for bs. for me she was one of studio66's top babes and think she will be a good addition to bs's roster.

bs has been going for over 10 years, so clearly they know how to survive in the babeshow industry and think they will still be around in 2015 in some shape or form

Have i heard it from them directly? no! have i seen various babes write on their twitter about it, stating that they didn't want to work there anymore because of the conditions and the producers? yes!

Well Rammy, i have heard it from a babe speaking on MFC, i've posted this before but Morgan Preece said a few months ago on MFC that she had to leave BS because the producers treat the girls like Robot's, whereas other channels don't , that was her words .

i would say i dont really have a type reallly i do like natural glamour but also like girl next door types like beth and even some girls with tattoos like Angel long, Reede, daryl and Alex adams. a girl has to intrigue me to get me to call

some of the old girls have been living on there old reputations for years without reproducing anything near it for years and it isnt just ofcom im sure if tiffany went nude to say lori's standards the forum would erupt again

would say apart from 2-4-1 and the hand thong what else is the difference between ofcom rules then and now i would say nothing much

I see the split screen scenario is back yet again tonight .
I sometimes wonder whether it might be better for BS to have only 4 babes on each night i.e one more babe than they have channels so that as one goes on a break there is always one babe to replace her on a rotation basis.
This would, if operated properly allow all four babes proper amounts of screen time and allow the focus to be on quality of stint rather than quantity of babes on each night.
Or maybe I am making the disgraceful mistake of adopting a common sense view .
I will go and stand in the corner and give myself a severe talking to .

Edit: And the split screen isn't even half and half .
Daisy Dash has less than half a screen to work with on 908 .

Roles reversed. Split screen where Daisy has more than half the screen except that two OSGs are partially in the way .
Split screen with OSGs .
I despair.

(22-09-2013 00:44 )snookered147 Wrote:  Roles reversed. Split screen where Daisy has more than half the screen except that two OSGs are partially in the way .
Split screen with OSGs .
I despair.

at one point the othernight you had 3 girls on the same set! considering there were only 5 girls on that night it was uneccesary,a the 4 girls a night idea really would work,each girl could get at least 1hr solo sessions,anyway the 241's are pointless if the girls are not allowed to do things like they used to be able to.

(22-09-2013 07:06 )Babestation Twitter Wrote:  @NikkiBenz hi Nikki, do u have contact info? Would like to discuss possible work over here in the uk. DM

Looks like BS is doing a studio66 = asking the US porn babes to work for them