Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion

(15-11-2012 02:19 )eccles Wrote:  Yup, there were times when I used to wonder how much to spend on encrypted shows each month, and people complained that they only showed 3 hours live sex a night. Some of the free stuff was stronger than encrypted today, hands and dildos down transparent knickers.

Thought Cameron was supposed to believe in the free market and customer choice.

Cameron only cares about himself lol.

(15-11-2012 11:49 )kalel76 Wrote:  

(15-11-2012 02:19 )eccles Wrote:  Yup, there were times when I used to wonder how much to spend on encrypted shows each month, and people complained that they only showed 3 hours live sex a night. Some of the free stuff was stronger than encrypted today, hands and dildos down transparent knickers.

Thought Cameron was supposed to believe in the free market and customer choice.

Cameron only cares about himself lol.

Moral of the story, never trust a Tory with a side parting

These forums are dead tonight! Where is everbody!

Either pissed or cant be bothered....the channels are too shit to talk about!

Lucy z and her nakedness is worth a watch but thats it!

(18-11-2012 03:37 )babefinder Wrote:  Either pissed or cant be bothered....the channels are too shit to talk about!

Lucy z and her nakedness is worth a watch but thats it!

Yep Lucy Zara is keeping me up, the naughty minx . Its a bedtime delay while she plays the there on there off there on there off game with her panties. Its keeping me guessing anyway .

Ive watched babestation tonight, lolly has been really good again on the new set with some oil, hats off to her, and georgie darby hot as ever with the other one

(18-11-2012 03:37 )babefinder Wrote:  Either pissed or cant be bothered....the channels are too shit to talk about!

Lucy z and her nakedness is worth a watch but thats it!

id gone to bed when youd posted this several good babes for me last night especially the two sophia's, knight and lares

is Marylin henshaw still on tv these days?

With regards to the 2 for 1's I've got to admit unless they are prepared to give us one old school style then I'd render them all pointless and total bullshit. Lori and Lolly putting on one of the most tame 2 for 1's I've seen in the history of the channels tonight.

The same too was like that on Studio66 with Jessie and Sasha last night. I've personally had it with them. They just bore the shit out of me. It's not a 2 for 1 unless we are seeing proper interaction.

Caty Cole and Charlie O'Neil is another example of a reminder from the past that when done properly they make for a great spectacle. At present I view them as a total waste of time and tedious doesn't even come close. Total cannon fodder.

Unless ofcom rules are changed then I wish the channels would just give up on them. They are that tame I find them offensive to be patronised into being led to believe that they are making for something of an erotic spectacle when clearly that's just not the case. Rant over.

The 2-4-1s of old seem like a long and distant memory now don't they?
There has to be a genuine chemistry between two babes to make the concept work and then they have to be allowed the freedom to show some intensity in their interaction. Either one or both of these things seems lacking in the current 2-4-1s. It seems a couple of blondes or couple of brunettes are just put together with no rhyme or reason these days in the vain hope that it will produce something entertaining and watchable. The Caty-Charlie 2-4-1 is the one that I will always recall most fondly.