Ultramantis Black
Account Closed
Posts: 403
Joined: Jul 2009
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
(26-08-2012 23:34 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote: They are always pushing the sale of photos ,but who is going to pay for nude photos of the girls when there is such a vast number of explicit photos free of charge on the internet
I've never understood this. Why would, say Lolly's fans, pay £3 for a photo of her when you can find far harder, more graphic stuff of her all over the net for free?
|
|
26-08-2012 23:46 |
|
bytor
Posting Machine
Posts: 3,680
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 55
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
(27-08-2012 04:40 )rj242 Wrote: The usual fun debate: who is correct - fanboys with anecdotal evidence of more phone waving or producers (whose jobs depend on getting this right) with actual call statistics.
Calling people derogatory names like fanboy does not add validity to your argument.
This is a forum-It's where people come to air their views.
I recall you have quite rightly pointed out in the past that nobody is made to watch these shows and if they do not like them then they can switch over.
Surely the same could be said about your constant haranguing of those complaining-if you don't like the thread why bother with it?
Do you come in here in the faint hope things might have improved?
That could be just the very reason some people watch BS and when it hasn't they come in here to vent their spleen. Not sure but just a thought.
Perhaps the forum should have a thread dedicated just to complaints and ideas for improvements from viewers and callers but I fear that this 'General Chat' thread would then become very quiet, with the exception of you and one or two others.
|
|
27-08-2012 08:20 |
|
jennifer
Danger Girl
Posts: 671
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 22
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
(27-08-2012 04:40 )rj242 Wrote: I can only imagine how frustrating it must be for some of the younger girls as they try to establish themselves but are given few opportunities and are forced to use twitter etc to try and build a following. Essentially they are in a catch 22 situation where they can't get screentime until they prove they can bring in calls, they can't bring in calls until they are established but they can't get established until they get screentime.
I realise that I'm restricted to the Freeview channels, and I'm probably missing a lot, but it seems to me that the newer girls are all very cautious compared to the ones that got me watching in the first place - Amanda, Stevie etc. You never knew what they'd do! And Jada and Paige were lovely, natural girls who liked to get naked. Most of the newer girls are very hesitant about getting naked, they seem very static and stay in the same position for ages, and they don't do anything interesting or informative, never mind exciting or risky. By "informative" I mean getting into natural, straightforward positions that show what their bodies really look like. I love it when they stand up and show themselves from various angles.
I won't complain about Lori because she's a gorgeous woman, not too skinny, and she tries so hard! Maybe not as great as when she was on Elite, but still the hardest trier on BS and she seems to like girls!
|
|
27-08-2012 09:13 |
|