Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(19-08-2012 15:44 )Rise Wrote:  Aaaah..
'Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got till it's gone..'
(as an old school singer with bad teeth used to sing)

Cinderella! Great song!!

(19-08-2012 15:50 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  First of all in responce to Rammy for the millionth time I do not claim to be a fanboy of any of the babe channels because in all honesty they are that tame at the moment they are embarrassing. Just watchable, just enough to hold your attention but hardly as good as anything that we've seen before.

Last night we witnessed a fairly decent 2 for 1, it was good but was no way near to what we have witnessed in the past between the likes of Caty Cole and Charlie O'Neil or Harwood or Zara. But going by the current climate and boredom of the recent 2 for 1's on elite this one at least had a point to it. For once we actually saw 2 getting as intimate as was permitted as opposed to just 2 girls just sharing the same screen which has been the case lately on the Cellcast channels.

Tonight could be very different, you see I call each and every show and channel on it's merit's. I may have praised Elite last night but be critical of it tonight which is what I do with all the channels...

ah the things arent as good as they were in the past comment again. we know why thats the case, your favourite obsession ofcom and there is no sign of things changing back to how they were

will agree that tonight's line up should see the good run of form studio66 is on continuing, especially with the likes of ally lou musgrove, ainsley addison and the start of uk porn star sophie dee's guest stint

Rammy you'd be the first one to comment on turning this into another ofcom thread, naturally I have to inject a bit of reality into the thread to stop people from thinking this was the greatest 2 for 1 in the history of this channel when it clearly wasn't.

Interestly the ofcom rules that were in place 2 years are exactly the same ones that are in place now with the exception of the topless only after 10PM rule with full nudity premitted after 11PM but in general you have to wait until after midnight before you can see any of the models in their full glory at the self regulation of this channel and others.

I'm not asking for or expecting to see anything that isn't allready permitted in the rulebook. Ofcom rules are true so I'm not going to have a go at any channel for refusing to break any of these rules including this one.

So once again last nights 2 for 1 wasn't bad and was a nice surprise to see the stint being justified for once. Ofcourse Caty's performance in the gym was overly disappointing. You have to be honest with that, I've seen some glorious nights from her in the past and last night was not one of them. If you can't be honest with that fact then no point in having a discussion on this show or any other for that matter.

Straight from the horse's mouth ...

(19-08-2012 18:07 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Rammy you'd be the first one to comment on turning this into another ofcom thread, naturally I have to inject a bit of reality into the thread to stop people from thinking this was the greatest 2 for 1 in the history of this channel when it clearly wasn't.

I'd be interested to hear who actually thought that good 241 last night was the best ever on the channels. Just to test how firm your grip on reality is

scottishbloke no one ever said it was the greatest 241, we just said it was the best 241 on elite/studio 66 in a long time. yes the rules might be the same but ofcom are more stricter in enforcing them hence why the shows have got tamer, especially with 241''s

i think you mean Shows not shomes .

I watched some of the 2 4 1 last night and it personally gives me a small hope that 2 4 1s still have a future across all the channels

Lately I have been thinking that its better to have solo sections more often

The trouble with 241s is that there's too many variables for them to fail. If the producer is too cautious for the babes to actually interact then it's doomed to fail from the start. Never mind one or both girls not being comfortable with such interaction. Or having no chemistry.

That wasn't the case last night, you got the impression that Sasha & Ainsley really are dirty little girls who go for it

I'm generally not a fan of 2-4-1s, as I've usually got my capper's hat (cap?) on, and they're much more difficult to do well. You've got twice the probability of having to ditch a good cap because of one of them blinking/pulling a silly face at the wrong time.
The chemistry between the girls is important, but it's usually something that needs to be built up over time. One good example recently is the Ally-Lou/Jayde duo. They've appeared a lot together and are clearly comfortable with each other. And going back a bit further, Becky and Rachel's occasional shows were not to be missed, but as they live together the chemistry was there from the start.