Mica Martinez - Babestation Nights - Chat & Discussion

I'm not saying the girls on that channel are old bones, I'm saying there's no meat to the channel itself.
It's a channel that certainly has produced some great girls, but by and large they only reach their potential when they leave the channel. Babestation simply had no idea how to make use of caty Cole and Charlie o Neal for example.

It acts as a useful incubator for sure, but for Mica to be moving there from Elite is a backward step in my opinion and I've got as much right as you to express that opinion Don.

(27-04-2012 19:33 )Don Tingley Wrote:  Yeah because seeing Mica sharing a bed with the likes of Georgie, Cherri, Lori, Daryl, Lolly or Tiffany would be just awful wouldn't it...

Each to their own, but well worn old bones? Don't think so.

It theory no, it wouldn't be awful but when you think about, 3 girls crammed on a bed (one been covered by an OSG) Then every now an again the camera pans to a girl trying to sell you stuff qvc style....it doesn't sound quite appealing

Can't see how Mica moving from a small Sky only babe channel company to a larger babe channel company with 4 freeview channels can be a step backward career wise , a far greater number of tv viewers will now be able to savour the delights of Mica , more exposure to a far greater number of viewers is bound to be a advantageous for her career . In regards to BS having no idea how to make use Caty cole , just remember Caty worked for them (Cellcast) for a few years and first won ultimate night babe of the year while working for them , so they must have been doing something right for her to stay that long and be so popular .

As far as I can see, Babestation are the biggest channel in the market. Don't underestimate how important the freeview slots are. If Mica does move and makes an impact like Lori then it will be a really good move for her but if she moves and gets lost in the shuffle then she may regret it.

(27-04-2012 20:25 )Don Tingley Wrote:  That's a strange or even poor choice of words. Just because a couple of girls leave for somewhere else, doesn't mean the channel "had no idea how to make use" of them at all.

Two examples more.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...773&page=4
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...28&page=42

(27-04-2012 20:27 )mr mystery Wrote:  Can't see how Mica moving from a small Sky only babe channel company to a larger babe channel company with 4 freeview channels can be a step backward career wise , a far greater number of tv viewers will now be able to savour the delights of Mica ,

Moving from the 4th most watched babe show to the channel with the most viewers is obviously a move in the right direction. Throw in some oil, interaction with other girls and the option to go nude and we should be treated to some good shows

(27-04-2012 20:32 )Don Tingley Wrote:  

(27-04-2012 20:16 )gazfc Wrote:  It theory no, it wouldn't be awful but when you think about, 3 girls crammed on a bed (one been covered by an OSG) Then every now an again the camera pans to a girl trying to sell you stuff qvc style....it doesn't sound quite appealing

As opposed to a channel that you either need Sky for or a monthly subscription. A lot of the same things about BS piss me off as well but, something rather than nothing.

Until Elite give the rest of us the chance to watch the channels on T.V then it's not really worth comparing is it.

They offer you something, some just choose not to take it

You buy a tv license, ariel, tv, freeview but you choose to stop there

(27-04-2012 20:27 )mr mystery Wrote:  In regards to BS having no idea how to make use Caty cole , just remember Caty worked for them (Cellcast) for a few years and first won ultimate night babe of the year while working for them , so they must have been doing something right for her to stay that long and be so popular .

Caty certainly made an impact while working at Babestation I'd agree, and the channel deserve credit for incubating her talent.

But when she switched to Elite she simply took off as a powerhouse of a babeshow performer, developing a distinctive role as a SIZZLING 2-4-1 star, the go-to girl for emcee-ing the debuts of new girls with a twinkle in her eye, etc etc. On Elite she developed far more of a distinctive and unique identity beyond being the 'other Rendall girl'.

As for Charlie, her shifts were so infrequent at Babestation that it was a bit of running joke on here, plus there was no consistency to where she was used... she'd be seen sometimes on days, sometimes as a brief night time fill in.
Again she found a platform that effectively utilised her star quality when she moved to Elite, and she's been a staple of the nightshows pretty much ever since.

(27-04-2012 20:45 )Sm© Wrote:  Moving from the 4th most watched babe show to the channel with the most viewers is obviously a move in the right direction. Throw in some oil, interaction with other girls and the option to go nude and we should be treated to some good shows

4th?? Lol

It's a shame all those viewers haven't helped babestations debt

(27-04-2012 20:44 )Don Tingley Wrote:  

(27-04-2012 20:37 )quiquems Wrote:  Two examples more.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...773&page=4
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...28&page=42

Two examples of what? Two examples of girls leaving Babestation? What's your point?

How about we make a list of girls that have left Elite and really see how pointless it all is.

In fact, you could get a good start to that list from this month alone...

(27-04-2012 20:03 )Rise Wrote:  It's a channel that certainly has produced some great girls, but by and large they only reach their potential when they leave the channel. Babestation simply had no idea how to make use of caty Cole and Charlie o Neal for example.

.