Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(17-01-2012 16:19 )ExtremelyCritical Wrote:  If this was a money issue why keep and pay all the girls that BabeStation don't do anything with? That's far more logical no? from there perspective at least.

Hey, my financial advice is being heeded!

I must be, a Nostradamus!

(11-03-2012 12:10 )bytor Wrote:  I ask this simple question; If there are so many girls on the books why is it Lolly, Lori and the twins on nearly every night?
Babestation? More like Desperation Station these days!

When posters say Babestation have more girls than ever, what they actually mean is Cellcast have more girls than ever. The Babestation brand has lost several girls but the other shows are presumably making up the shortfall.

(11-03-2012 12:10 )bytor Wrote:  

(11-03-2012 11:38 )TheWatcher Wrote:  When I switched over from Match of the Day last night, for a couple of seconds I thought they had a new girl on.
I then realised it was Lori, but she looked different. Whether it was the hair, or makeup, or her tits were covered, I'm not sure.
Could be a trial for a new BS tactic, i.e. disguise the girls so it looks like they have more girls left than they actually have.
Despite various people saying that they now have more girls than ever, I do not consider the Masti or Apprentice girls to be "real" BS girls as we know them.

I have a sneaky feeling that most who post saying how fantastic BS is now and how they have more girls than anyone else, are moles planted by BS to spread confusion among the ranks of forum members.
I ask this simple question; If there are so many girls on the books why is it Lolly, Lori and the twins on nearly every night?
Babestation? More like Desperation Station these days!

These girls you mention were on nearly every night before any of the recent departures took place , they are on the most because presumably they bring in the ££££ for Cellcast , Like has been said , all the girls no matter what the name of the channel is they appear on they all work for the same company "Cellcast", all the money they bring in no matter what the program is called goes to the same place "Cellcast" , and lets not forget that in the last few weeks some of the girls that appear on the specialist apprentice BS show appeared on BS1 and BS Xtra , 6 was it in the last week or so ? , also Dani Amour from Dirty wives also appears on BS at times as well ,and so does 1 or more of the Masti girls . So any time BS may be short of a girl they just bring 1 in from one of their other shows .

(11-03-2012 12:10 )bytor Wrote:  I have a sneaky feeling that most who post saying how fantastic BS is now and how they have more girls than anyone else, are moles planted by BS to spread confusion among the ranks of forum members.

Yes bytor is right. Anyone who disagrees with him or has different tastes to him is a troll and anyone who admits to liking a Babestation show is a mole. I personally suspect iloveMegan of being the mole-in-chief.

Your saying they have plenty of Girls im saying they are not Babestation girls and will never be seen as that they may be masti chat girls or Dirty wives so all they have is whats left to do 2 shows 7 nights a week dont think they expected so many to leave in such a short space of time

(11-03-2012 12:40 )HannahsPet Wrote:  Your saying they have plenty of Girls im saying they are not Babestation girls and will never be seen as that

If the channel names hadn't been changed but each was still dedicated to a particular theme (Masti girls on BS Blue and Dirty Wives on BS Xtra for example), would they be considered Babestation girls then? Did you consider Dani Amour a proper Babestation girl when she did some standard BS shows before the dedicated Dirty Wives channel started? And are you including the Apprentice girls in that statement, I mean all the Babestation girls had to start somewhere.

(11-03-2012 12:35 )admiral decker Wrote:  I personally suspect iloveMegan of being the mole-in-chief.

Those two years I spent posting before defending Babestation were all part of my long con

(11-03-2012 12:23 )ExtremelyCritical Wrote:  

(17-01-2012 16:19 )ExtremelyCritical Wrote:  If this was a money issue why keep and pay all the girls that BabeStation don't do anything with? That's far more logical no? from there perspective at least.

Hey, my financial advice is being heeded!

I must be, a Nostradamus!

I doubt they get paid if they're not actually on a shift.

ive said it before but the only way forward for all the channels is if a floating rosta where the girls can switch operators from one night to another. as it stands b/s is despite putting on some decent shows, becoming tiresome and so predictable !

(11-03-2012 13:04 )shankey! Wrote:  ive said it before but the only way forward for all the channels is if a floating rosta where the girls can switch operators from one night to another. as it stands b/s is despite putting on some decent shows, becoming tiresome and so predictable !

You do realise that the channels are competing against each other. Why would any of them agree to that?

Yes i did class dani amour as a BS girl as she has done the main show as well as extreme but now shes a dirty wife also count the apprentices if they have appeared on the main show or extreme so thats luan lexie lacey Nicole and the other one my memory has given up on me what her name was and sasha of course Cherri is classed as a daytime girl as shes prenominately a day giirl that does a few hours on the night show