General News Thread

(10-06-2020 04:16 )HannahsPet Wrote:  

(10-06-2020 02:50 )atlasshrugged Wrote:  This country is being infested by communist PC ratbags. I'm shocked the babe channels haven't gone by now, though it's only a matter of time before the SJW feminazis start complaining.

Nah they will drive themselves out of business before the feminazi's will

and to be fair the lads mags didnt go out of business cos of them its becase the internet did for magazines

f we ever get a PM backed by those Feminazi's hell bent on Web/porn regulation, it won't take them long to get around to shutting down porn from the Web then St66 will be seriously fucked

Little Britain banned, yet GMTV have shown one of the clips a dozen times.

If they are banning little britian then they should ban the movie white chicks just so there are no double standards...

The way things are going, in a few years time nobody will talk anymore through fear of offending someone

I notice that George Washington had slaves. Maybe the USA will change the name of their capital.

^^
Every rich powerful man from a 100 years ago would have had slaves.... its kinda like what big companys do now hiring immigrants who will work for peanuts

Every rich powerful man had slaves in 1920? Washington died 221 yrs ago, abolition in the UK was 187 yrs ago, 155 in the US.

I can't care less about Little Britain, never found it funny, watched computer says no & only gay in the village stone faced.

White chicks is just not the same thing as blackface because it doesn't have a long history of mocking marginalised & subjugated people. It's like comparing a punch from Anthony Joshua to punch from a flyweight

^Fair point goatman mate

(10-06-2020 08:50 )southsidestu Wrote:  Every rich powerful man had slaves in 1920? Washington died 221 yrs ago, abolition in the UK was 187 yrs ago, 155 in the US.

I can't care less about Little Britain, never found it funny, watched computer says no & only gay in the village stone faced.

White chicks is just not the same thing as blackface because it doesn't have a long history of mocking marginalised & subjugated people. It's like comparing a punch from Anthony Joshua to punch from a flyweight

Not really... racism is racism it should go both ways history or not, i mean in terms of discrimination and mockery who has been mocked more than fat people thats been going on for centuries yet we don't have protests for fat lives matter....

It's interesting to see Anthony Joshua mentioned above after his little rant suggesting that black people should boycott "white businesses" the other day. Would this be the same Anthony Joshua who accused a rival of being a "disgrace to the superior black race" or -posted some bizarre nonsense on Snapchat suggesting that Robert Mugabe was a victim of a media smear campaign? His manager was left to try and smooth things over by claiming his accounts were hacked. Yeah, right.

Then we have Lewis Hamilton spouting forth pearls of wisdom from his Monte Carlo tax haven, telling us that monuments to people involved in slavery should be pulled down.

Fair enough Lewis, let's do it, statues don't mean a lot to me but don't you drive for Mercedes, who were previously Daimler Benz who used forced labour from Concentration Camps to make vehicles for the Nazis? Isn't one of your personal sponsors Hugo Boss who did a lovely line in uniforms for the Waffen SS & Wehrmacht?

Sort out the real issues like gang violence & the knife crime epidemic & worry about a few old statues later.

John Boyega struck the right tone with his speech imo, it came from the heart and was passionate. It's good that directors and producers are publicly backing him, given his worry about speaking from the heart, but his speech was a balanced one (unlike Joshua's), calling for change, not to boycott this or that, which only creates further division.

Star Wars are getting called out though, I didn't know this, but they actually airbrushed him out of the Chinese posters, so erm, awkward.