(10-11-2023 16:45 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]From what I saw from around midnight onward, it was a rather dull and tame night.
Kendall not allowed to go nude. Maybe she doesn't want to?
Zeena not allowed to go nude.
Georgie seeming to ask the producer to go nude, only to be told no.
Caty being quite tame. Her best session from my view was on the 28th of October, 3am to 3:30am. Standing nude too. I guess some here prefer her to be non nude?
Maybe tonight and tomorrow will be better.
You do realise this is not a "review of last night's show", this is just you banging on about which girls were more nude or less nude...
Guys, please be aware some of the girls, especially newer girls, read these "reviews" so at least try to make them actual reviews with more criteria than how much pussy is on show during a free TV show. They are trying their best to put on a good TV show and the least they deserve is balanced, fair and intelligent feedback. Thanks.
(11-11-2023 11:35 )CheekyKev Wrote: [ -> ]You do realise this is not a "review of last night's show", this is just you banging on about which girls were more nude or less nude...
Guys, please be aware some of the girls, especially newer girls, read these "reviews" so at least try to make them actual reviews with more criteria than how much pussy is on show during a free TV show. They are trying their best to put on a good TV show and the least they deserve is balanced, fair and intelligent feedback. Thanks.
Yes, this is a review of last night's show. That's my review of the mostly boring night. Intelligent feedback?
I suggest you look into the definition of reviewing something like a show. It means highlighting and rating a variety of factors. Your "review" seems to be based only on how much nudity you got to see from a girl or not. That is not a "review".
(12-11-2023 15:25 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Much better night last night. Lori gave one of her best nude performances I've seen, as did Atlanta, and Beth did some good sessions too. Good camera work.
Here is a challenge for you, try doing a review without using the word nude....
To be fair to mr mann, with whom I am seldom in agreement anyway, he clearly has his criteria for what he feels makes a night show good or bad, and he sticks to it. As, in fact, do winsaw, geriisgreat and trains (and me when I join in).
What this thread gives is a generalised over-view. Specific babes, to whom you are concerned, will be advised to read their own threads where they might get more specific feedback, should they want to know if they've got a great arse or not.
Like I said, his criteria is simply how much nudity he sees from the girl, which is incredibly basic and ignores all the other aspects to what makes a show better or worse. Maybe he needs to start a new thread called "how much free pussy did I see on the shows last night", because calling that a "review" is really not correct, is it.
The girls that look at this thread are actually new to TV and think that they might actually get some useful feedback, alas not. They are not looking to know if you think they have a "great arse or not". How insulting if you think that is all they care about.
(11-11-2023 11:35 )CheekyKev Wrote: [ -> ]You do realise this is not a "review of last night's show", this is just you banging on about which girls were more nude or less nude...
Guys, please be aware some of the girls, especially newer girls, read these "reviews" so at least try to make them actual reviews with more criteria than how much pussy is on show during a free TV show. They are trying their best to put on a good TV show and the least they deserve is balanced, fair and intelligent feedback. Thanks.
You do realise this is not a ''gatekeep other members'' thread, this is just you banging on about what you think constitutes a valid review.
His post did not insult,
nor did it need to be backseat moderated, which, fyi, is against forum rules, so chill tf out. This it not some serious critique thread, it's people sharing their opinion in review form, agree or disagree, but trying to insult another's intelligence to make yourself feel like you're defending the presenters honour or some shit, is poor form from you.
See, I can do the same as you. I suggest you move on!
Job Vacancy - UKBC Babestatiion Nightshow Reviewer
Pay - None
Hours - 22.00 - 05.30 - 7 Shifts per Week
Applicants will be expected to view adult material and compile a thorough unbiased overview to be posted daily, and then subjected to heavy scrutiny by a self-appointed thread moderator.
(12-11-2023 20:27 )skully Wrote: [ -> ] (11-11-2023 11:35 )CheekyKev Wrote: [ -> ]You do realise this is not a "review of last night's show", this is just you banging on about which girls were more nude or less nude...
Guys, please be aware some of the girls, especially newer girls, read these "reviews" so at least try to make them actual reviews with more criteria than how much pussy is on show during a free TV show. They are trying their best to put on a good TV show and the least they deserve is balanced, fair and intelligent feedback. Thanks.
You do realise this is not a ''gatekeep other members'' thread, this is just you banging on about what you think constitutes a valid review.
His post did not insult, nor did it need to be backseat moderated, which, fyi, is against forum rules, so chill tf out. This it not some serious critique thread, it's people sharing their opinion in review form, agree or disagree, but trying to insult another's intelligence to make yourself feel like you're defending the presenters honour or some shit, is poor form from you.
See, I can do the same as you. I suggest you move on!
As expected, you old timers all rally round each other, not surprising and it says that you have no response to the actual point I was making other than to attack me.
I know that I made a very valid point and I was not insulting anyone's intelligence or trying to "gatekeep". A "review" should be about more than how naked and nude a girl got during her TV show. Simple.
(12-11-2023 21:31 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]Job Vacancy - UKBC Babestatiion Nightshow Reviewer
Pay - None
Hours - 22.00 - 05.30 - 7 Shifts per Week
Applicants will be expected to view adult material and compile a thorough unbiased overview to be posted daily, and then subjected to heavy scrutiny by a self-appointed thread moderator.
Of course Boomer you always feel the need to take the counter view of anything I ever write on these forums. It is getting tiresome now.
To clarify again, I was not questioning or moderating the reviews in general on this thread, I know its just personal opinion. I was only pointing out correctly that to rate a girls performance based ONLY on how much nudity she shows is most definitely not a "review".