(05-09-2014 18:45 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-09-2014 16:11 )Craig_123 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-09-2014 12:40 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]I think Scarlett was awful after 9.30,it was just an extended dayshow,although she has to be praised for taking away Lucy Anne's crown for the least amount of movement in a tease show.its a shame really as with the exception of Lucy Anne the tease shows had been much better but they took a huge step backward last night.on the plus side at least the daytime numbers stayed up because thats all it was.
She even stated on mic that it was a extended dayshow, everyone just expected a tease as it was within the hours of one.
If thats the case then fair play to S66 who must be doing well enough to start their nightshow a full 90 mins after their rivals,or maybe it was a taste of how Ofcom would like future nightshows to be,or its more likely she is contractually restricted on when she can go topless,which is fine but does not make her a good tease show candidate,also i always thought the epg was a legal statement,so if it says Studio66 Nights then thats what there should at least be an element of surely,BS have babes who dont go topless till 10pm but will at least talk dirty after 9pm.
But you got so angry could have just switched over? I do agree with some points you make, and "nightshows" never topless till 10, they start at 10 on S66/RLC (Not including Tease/Naughty Hours) and at 9 on BS with no nudity, she's never stated to be a tease candidate either although last night for some reason she was on those times and obviously was on the EPG, yes BS do and so do RLC you will have noticed S66 don't have many stay much after 9.
For a detailed discussion on the relative merits and drawbacks of day girls venturing into nighttime hours -- sometimes veering from the sublime to the ridiculous and back again -- see: Anderson, Danielle.
Leaving all of that aside...
I'm not having a go, Jimmy, it is just an observation, but I really think you give the programming and scheduling capacities of these babeshows too much credit.
I really can't picture them as a diabolical cabal of generals pushing little models of babes around on a big map, with really long sticks. Planning weeks in advance, with charts on the wall that show the profit maximizing position of Gemma Hiles on a day show / tease hour / night show continuum. And then laughing maniacally when Cara Brett cuts me off for having a wank at 9:15. 'Mwahahaha ... we got another one!'
It is more likely 'Barry' with a clipboard taking phone calls from girls stuck in traffic on the M4. None of it is planned. Shit just happens. A butterfly flaps its wings in Beijing and Scarlet ends up on TV at 9:45.
I don't think that there is anything more sinister in it than that...
(05-09-2014 10:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Yes I also can understand the criticism of scarlet being static goodfella3041. It was the comments she got saying a person on their death bed was more livelier than her and that a forum member thought their tv had broke because scarlet was barely moving which I thought went too far in terms of criticising scarlet
Scarlet does seem to be busy each show she does so clearly her callers and viewers aren't bothered by her lack of movement
im sorry for my comment,didn't know people took things so seriously. Im sure all these babes, would never say anything that crossed the line, much like yourself rammy, again heartfelt apologies
Fed up with the catsuit, rather see more flesh!
I ain't fed up with the catsuit
scarlet is in a catsuit today.....but it's not her famous red one. she's wearing a very nice black one
This girl is unbelievably gorgeous could quite happily enjoy her all day.
Variety is nice, but I think I preferred the red one, actually. Maybe it's the black-against-purple of the bedspread, but I don't think this one shows off her gorgeous body as much as the red one does.