One from Dannii Harwood that made me laugh
She's has a promotion on her page at the minute and this is the advert for it:
"I’ve just uploaded a complete Bondage set of FREE b/g pics with video!!!!! Join for HALF PRICE now!!!!"
"
FREE b/g pics"... that you have to pay to see
(02-02-2022 20:17 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: [ -> ]I tried out Tori Lee’s this month.
Some glammy shots and selfies on the main page. Okay, but nothing special.
Some good PPV content that ranges from solo stuff to homemade BG. Fairly frequent, well made and edited, and not exorbitantly priced. Even cheaper when she bundles up some older stuff.
But this one is new to me:
“Hey if your not spending on my page I’m very sorry but I’ll have to deactivate your account on my side .. my page is my living , I expect my fans to support my business & not expect to see every thing for free , it’s got to work both ways xxxxx”
How obnoxious is that?
I say this as someone who has spent money on her content: I never will again. Likeability counts — and that’s just rude.
More than that, I suspect it is counter-productive. Is a message like that really going to make someone spend who wasn’t spending already? But I expect more than a few guys immediately hit ‘unsubscribe’ after reading it. Including some of us who were spending.
Been on more than one or two that have more or less said the same thing, if you're not spending you'll be removed. I mean I can maybe understand it if someone was demanding stuff the babe didn't do or they were being rude but if you've done none of that then I fail to see any right they have to deactivate someones account even though they've been paying the sub fee. If im on any others like that I unsub. Definitely won't make me spend more.
(07-02-2022 15:02 )babefan2012 Wrote: [ -> ]I fail to see any right they have to deactivate someones account even though they've been paying the sub fee.
A creator on OnlyFans can deactivate your account at any time. They have the right to do that, although it means that your sub fee would get refunded.
(07-02-2022 16:12 )marlowe Wrote: [ -> ] (07-02-2022 15:02 )babefan2012 Wrote: [ -> ]I fail to see any right they have to deactivate someones account even though they've been paying the sub fee.
A creator on OnlyFans can deactivate your account at any time. They have the right to do that, although it means that your sub fee would get refunded.
I do know that I was more meaning from any moral or ethical reasoning based solely off how much or how little you are spending besides the monthly subscription fee. If someone is rude or demanding or indeed even threatening then of course they should have the right to deactivate someone's subscription, but based off money spent is taking it to the limit.
The worse thing is when they decide you aren't spending enough on PPV so restrict you. Then have the gall to say you not buying the content, well sorry you can't when ur restricted. Afraid they do that I report it to MFC, they'll often request the creator unrestrict you (assuming you've not done something to justify it) or they'll instruct the creator to cancel ur sub which instigates the refund.
(07-02-2022 18:35 )babefan2012 Wrote: [ -> ]If someone is rude or demanding or indeed even threatening then of course they should have the right to deactivate someone's subscription, but based off money spent is taking it to the limit.
My suggestion would be as follows. If the monthy sub itself is not worthwhile to a creator, so much so that they threaten to deactive subscriptions for not buying enough PPV, then don't bother with a subscription fee in the first place. Let people join for free and that way there are more potential buyers around. Otherwise simply charge more for the monthly sub so that the fee becomes worthwhile in itself and therefore makes the subs worth having without any PPV purchases.
Incidentally, has anyone ever actually deactivated someone's subscription in the way being discussed? I only ask because these sort of threats sound like a bluff to me and not a sensible thing to do at all. It can't be good business practice because someone who hasn't bought any PPV still might do so eventually. I mean when I said in my post above that they have the right to deactivate a subscription in this way, I wasn't implying that I thought it was reasonable course of action.
I have seen a few porn stars and adult model types doing that. I guess they must have such a following that they've worked out they could do without the monthly subscription fee and focus on the PPV in messages.
I've never seen anyone complaining they have been kicked for not spending enough, it is largely just a big bluff but from personal experience with some it wouldn't surprise me that some would indeed follow through with it.
(02-02-2022 20:17 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: [ -> ]I tried out Tori Lee’s this month.
Some glammy shots and selfies on the main page. Okay, but nothing special.
Some good PPV content that ranges from solo stuff to homemade BG. Fairly frequent, well made and edited, and not exorbitantly priced. Even cheaper when she bundles up some older stuff.
But this one is new to me:
“Hey if your not spending on my page I’m very sorry but I’ll have to deactivate your account on my side .. my page is my living , I expect my fans to support my business & not expect to see every thing for free , it’s got to work both ways xxxxx”
How obnoxious is that?
I say this as someone who has spent money on her content: I never will again. Likeability counts — and that’s just rude.
More than that, I suspect it is counter-productive. Is a message like that really going to make someone spend who wasn’t spending already? But I expect more than a few guys immediately hit ‘unsubscribe’ after reading it. Including some of us who were spending.
More than anything else its just a terrible business practice, you'll either alienate current customers or disuade people from subscribing, if youre not happy with the amount you make from subs you need to up your sub price to something youre comfortable with, I wish half these OF creators would just look at hiring someone with a shred of advertising or content based platform knowledge.
Anyway to current updates.
-
Mikki B is as infuriating as ever she's taken to just straight spamming like three to four posts a day via DM's some of the content is good, some is not, but crucially the most annoying part is not previewing said DM'd content because its "XRATED" or whatever midly annoying tagline theyre using that day, on the plus side she does do a live show bi weekly at the moment and as mentioned some of the content she puts out is good, its infuriating because she has so much potential.
-
Amanda Rendall again on sale, sneds messages every day either offering customs for 100 dollars for 5 minutes or short video messages between 3-10 dollars a message but the content has gotten seriously sloppy, I purchased a DM that was essentially Amanda rubbing her nose constantly due to a substance *
allergy* she then half heartedly rubbed her self while seeming out of it, the video was about 5 minutes long and had some abusrd unrelated title, as far as OF content goes Amanda's not the vibe she once was.
-
Reed Amber Reed has been filming some B/G stuff but its at the top end of the PPV scale (which I'm ok with because youre not forced to buy it) and she should be able to charge what she thinks is appropriate, that being said her posts are very sporadic and probably not quite worth the $15 monthly unless you are a die hard, once you add the sub, the ppv price and then the tax its actually incredibly expensive.
Yeah I have to agree with Mikki B's, very clickbaity or at least sound more naughty than what they are.
Wouldn't recommend Darelle's, she's posted about half dozen photos in the last few weeks, plus some very short (no more than 30secs) topless vids.
No ppv, or DM's sent at all in the last couple of weeks. Not sure if that's good or bad.
All for 12.99 a month (only subbed cause it was on offer at 3.90).