The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: OnlyFans
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
I must admit I don’t miss OF having been off it since end of August/start of September last year and moving over to Fansly, not paying the 20% vat on purchases and subscriptions is big bonus, I do however sometimes miss the banter you can have with some of the ladies that I followed (the ones that are OF only) it wasn’t always about the naughty shit, got to have the banter part too I think
(05-01-2022 20:19 )Drowner Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure but I think they can only remove an account if they have no members.

You're right about this, if someone chooses to delete their account they have to wait until all the member subscriptions they have are expired and only then will the account actually be deleted.

Of course if any new members signup it will put a spanner in the works and the account deletion will take even longer, so putting the price up to $50 to deter new subscriptions is a good ploy.
(05-01-2022 18:16 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: [ -> ]I just noticed that Gemma Jane’s OF page has leapt to £50 pm, which I think is the maximum allowed.

My sub expired in August and I can see that she has made 1 post since then. So she is charging the toppest of top-dollar, for no real content.

I’ve noticed this sudden hyperinflation on a couple of other occasions and both times the girl abandoned OF within a couple of months.

What’s the scam here? Is it in the hope of snagging a few bucks from guys who forget to switch off the ‘auto renew’? Or is it just a final landgrab before retirement, when customer satisfaction doesn’t matter?

Either way, it’s not a good look.

Keep an eye on your auto-renews, gents. Looks like the word is out.

Gemma Jane suggested that she was pursuing a new career sometime last year & moving away from this line of work within a year.
(06-01-2022 01:33 )marlowe Wrote: [ -> ]
(05-01-2022 20:19 )Drowner Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure but I think they can only remove an account if they have no members.

You're right about this, if someone chooses to delete their account they have to wait until all the member subscriptions they have are expired and only then will the account actually be deleted.

Of course if any new members signup it will put a spanner in the works and the account deletion will take even longer, so putting the price up to $50 to deter new subscriptions is a good ploy.

Ah that makes sense. My cynicism obviously got away from me there.
Has anyone joined Fernanda Ferrari’s OnlyFans page? Would be interested to know what the feedback is....
(06-01-2022 11:07 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]
(05-01-2022 18:16 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: [ -> ]I just noticed that Gemma Jane’s OF page has leapt to £50 pm, which I think is the maximum allowed.

My sub expired in August and I can see that she has made 1 post since then. So she is charging the toppest of top-dollar, for no real content.

I’ve noticed this sudden hyperinflation on a couple of other occasions and both times the girl abandoned OF within a couple of months.

What’s the scam here? Is it in the hope of snagging a few bucks from guys who forget to switch off the ‘auto renew’? Or is it just a final landgrab before retirement, when customer satisfaction doesn’t matter?

Either way, it’s not a good look.

Keep an eye on your auto-renews, gents. Looks like the word is out.

Gemma Jane suggested that she was pursuing a new career sometime last year & moving away from this line of work within a year.
I remember her tweeting something along those liners somdeJust hope whatever she does she will be happy.
Does anybody know anything about Cara Steel's OnlyFans at the moment?

Seems to have gone a bit quiet recently...
Katie Price (at age 43) is the latest 'celebrity' to join OnlyFans. She doesn't seem to be going back to her topless modelling roots though, as so far she has only posted lingerie pictures.
It’s obviously a condition of her returning to Xpanded, but Jennifer Kelly has closed her OnlyFans and moved all her content to SoSpoilt.
I tried out Tori Lee’s this month.

Some glammy shots and selfies on the main page. Okay, but nothing special.

Some good PPV content that ranges from solo stuff to homemade BG. Fairly frequent, well made and edited, and not exorbitantly priced. Even cheaper when she bundles up some older stuff.

But this one is new to me:

“Hey if your not spending on my page I’m very sorry but I’ll have to deactivate your account on my side .. my page is my living , I expect my fans to support my business & not expect to see every thing for free , it’s got to work both ways xxxxx”

How obnoxious is that?

I say this as someone who has spent money on her content: I never will again. Likeability counts — and that’s just rude.

More than that, I suspect it is counter-productive. Is a message like that really going to make someone spend who wasn’t spending already? But I expect more than a few guys immediately hit ‘unsubscribe’ after reading it. Including some of us who were spending.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
Reference URL's