The UK Babe Channels Forum

Babestation does not appear to be on a high at the moment and in fact I think most of us here would say it is in something of a decline just now (and that’s without considering the recent cutbacks to Babestation Xtra and Babestation Unleashed).

So my question is how to restore Babestation’s fortunes? Please vote in this poll on which of the listed issues you feel are having a negative impact on their channels at this time and could do with changes being made to improve things.

Please only vote for those options which you think are currently very detrimental to the channels and where you think change could effect a significant improvement. Plus feel free to post here about any other issues not listed in the poll.

Picture resolution and onscreen graphics are the main issues for me, because I would say that in those areas Babestation are being left behind by their main opposition.

(06-10-2016 13:28 )Scots Napoleon Wrote: [ -> ]Picture resolution and onscreen graphics are the main issues for me, because I would say that in those areas Babestation are being left behind by their main opposition.

Yes I agree. If you compare the graphics on Studio 66 FV they are just along the bottom of the screen and hardly intrude on the girl/s! Much better and yet all the information is there.

Scrap the perv cams:

you cud vote 4 all of em

They need to use the graphics so we cant see what we want to see,so what if the odd flash is shown...accidentaly.

Stop the pointless 241's.

Sack the undereager cameramen who insist on just showing the top halves of the girls.

Bring back the sauna / shower.

And the most obvious Ditch The Pervcam,some of the girls are more interested in that, when they should be concentrating on the big viewing point... The people who watch/ring in... How many times can you see the same pussy night after night..oh no not (insert girls name) again.

1. Fewer OSG's

2. Higher picture quality

3. A wider range of sets ( sauna/shower/locker room/ classroom/ bedroom etc )

4. No more £2.50 connection fees

5. At least one of my fave babes on every night of the week.

(06-10-2016 17:17 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]They need to use the graphics so we cant see what we want to see,so what if the odd flash is shown...accidentaly.

Stop the pointless 241's.

Sack the undereager cameramen who insist on just showing the top halves of the girls.

Bring back the sauna / shower.

And the most obvious Ditch The Pervcam,some of the girls are more interested in that, when they should be concentrating on the big viewing point... The people who watch/ring in... How many times can you see the same pussy night after night..oh no not (insert girls name) again.

Hi there YES I agree with all that! It would be a very good start in getting them more watchable. It needs to happen sooner rather than later BEFORE its too late! I wonder if they are reading this?

Picture resolution is poor - it would be nice if it was better, but it doesn't bother me that much.

Too many onscreen graphics - I'd prefer it if it was similar to Sky Sports News' OSG, just a simple two tier bar at the bottom.

Too many girls onscreen - DBS suck mainly because girls can no longer touch each other.

Girls not attractive enough - BS do have some beautiful hosts, but most are not great performers.

Shows are always the same - BS do need to encourage their hosts to change their outfits and sets at least 3 times a shift.

Lighting of inferior quality - most hosts are over lit with light.

The sets are dull/stale - most hosts don't use the sets to their full capability, but constantly new sets necessary.

Too many calling gimmicks - more focus need to be placed on creating great shows, not gimmicks.

The calls are too expensive - lower prices would encourage more calls.

Over emphasis on Pervcam - it has pretty much killed daytime TV as a visual experience, due to a lack of movement.

Knock it down & build flats.