(19-10-2016 13:56 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]I'm surprised only 6% think the call price is too high. Maybe it's a reflection on the number of voters who actually call the shows, though.
OSG's being a bigger concern than cheaper calls is worrisome
As a visual stimulus, BS is probably broken beyond repair now. Cannot see them or any other channel really enticing new callers with that product, the shows are now too tame, scripted or expensive to call. They only concentrate on rinsing even more from the core addicted punters they've got left (the pervecam monster now a main tool) & can even afford to take the piss out of them with their gimmicks & scorecards
Babes don't have to make the effort they used to, and the studio don't have to either on their picture quality & sets. Pretty much unwatchable now.
(19-10-2016 19:16 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ] (19-10-2016 13:56 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]I'm surprised only 6% think the call price is too high. Maybe it's a reflection on the number of voters who actually call the shows, though.
OSG's being a bigger concern than cheaper calls is worrisome
Not really. OSG's affect everyone but call costs only affect callers. I did think 6% was low, though.
(19-10-2016 19:16 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]OSG's being a bigger concern than cheaper calls is worrisome
Perhaps people are looking at these things in comparison to what the opposition are offering.
Studio 66 don't offer cheaper calls than Babestation do they? But they do offer less OSGs.
Perhaps the vote reflects not that OSGs are a bigger concern than cheaper calls, but that OSGs are an area where Babestation are falling behind the opposition, whereas call prices isn't such an area.
You dudes are right OSG's affect everyone, and also if BS' call rates were dramatically higher than their rivals it would be of greater concern
1. Too many onscreen graphics
2. Picture resolution is poor
3. The sets are dull/stale
it seems that a lot of set are made of hard furniture. That means that there isn't enough doggy like I'd like to see. A bed or a couch in the set is better.
4. while I love stockings, nylon and lingerie in general, I think that those stockings with the white and black lines are the ugliest I've ever seen. I don't know if it's the fashion of the moment but I really don't like those things at all.
(19-10-2016 15:04 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]I was talking about that supposed porn channel bsx not the main channels which btw is beyond repair.
BSX appears to be outside the scope of the current poll.
(20-10-2016 00:14 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ] (19-10-2016 15:04 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]I was talking about that supposed porn channel bsx not the main channels which btw is beyond repair.
BSX appears to be outside the scope of the current poll.
If you're going to be as pedantic as that, Babenation and Meet the Babes are also outside the scope of the poll since only one channel is called Babestation.
(20-10-2016 01:01 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]If you're going to be as pedantic as that, Babenation and Meet the Babes are also outside the scope of the poll since only one channel is called Babestation.
No this is incorrect and admiral decker's point was a perfectly valid one. I devised the poll and it applies to 'Babestation' as most people here would understand that term, which therefore includes Babenation and Meet the Babes. It does not cover BSX, because some of the poll options would not be applicable to that service. On BSX there are no calling gimmicks for example and often not any phones at all. There are also minimal OSGs compared to Babestation and sometimes none at all. A poll to cover BSX would need to have quite different voting options to the ones given here.
Pin code it and improve the quality of the show.