^^ A great point made ryuken, as always.
I'm in agreement with you as far as Hannah C is concerned, you can never get tired of her pretty face, super attractive.
Definitely ryuken and boom Hannah c has been always lovely definitely cheers me up after a frustrating day or just in general
(20-12-2022 07:43 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ] (19-12-2022 16:49 )hornball Wrote: [ -> ] (18-12-2022 23:41 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]These babes are overrated based on their average weekly BS leaderboard positions.
Alice Goodwin
April Mae
Megan Rox
Amber Paige
Any punter that spends over £1,000 a week on a babe should just hire an escort instead.
Really?? They don't ..... do they??
I agree, at least with an escort, it is a 'real' 1 to 1 experience
Previous Winners
Week ending - Sunday 18th December
1st Amber Paige 26025 credits rob2410 - 20700
2nd Jennifer Wilde 17225 credits rob2410 - 15650
3rd Alice Goodwin 13640 credits FDexter - 12725
Week ending - Sunday 11th December
1st Amber Paige 41160 credits rob2410 - 30830
2nd Ashlyn Shaw 21380 credits rob2410 - 16640
3rd Beth Bennett 20920 credits Mebs - 4000
Week ending - Sunday 4th December
1st Beth Bennett 20890 credits andy@reelectronics.co.uk - 11750
2nd Jennifer Wilde 20400 credits rob2410 - 15700
3rd Layla Rose 19270 credits Jamez1991 - 10240
Week ending - Sunday 27th November
1st Beth Bennett 31995 credits andy@reelectronics.co.uk - 15200
2nd Amber Paige 22805 credits rob2410 - 18050
3rd Lucy Brookes 22135 credits MarkMonty - 18000
Week ending - Sunday 20th November
1st Amber Paige 24765 credits rob2410 - 19450
2nd Alice Goodwin 22595 credits FDexter - 19725
3rd Layla Rose 21970 credits Ballybambam - 15960
Week ending - Sunday 13th November
1st Mia Middleton 37115 credits rob2410 - 20575
2nd Alice Goodwin 32600 credits FDexter - 27025
3rd Megan Rox 27715 credits rob2410 - 18550
I've read the girls only get 50% of what the punters pay. Any idea if this is true. If it is true, seems they are getting scammed.
(23-12-2022 04:48 )nf-t fan Wrote: [ -> ]I've read the girls only get 50% of what the punters pay. Any idea if this is true. If it is true, seems they are getting scammed.
Depends on the individuals contract, but 50% sounds accurate. "Scammed" would be the wrong way of putting it as no one is forced to sign.
Brooksie Brooks. I really like her but i don't think she should of cleaned up the awards this year i can name about 5 babes that have been better then her this year.
Think she should have a chance to win the booty award but that's about it because man she showed her booty in a good way this year.
(23-12-2022 06:28 )Spike1876 Wrote: [ -> ] (23-12-2022 04:48 )nf-t fan Wrote: [ -> ]I've read the girls only get 50% of what the punters pay. Any idea if this is true. If it is true, seems they are getting scammed.
Depends on the individuals contract, but 50% sounds accurate. "Scammed" would be the wrong way of putting it as no one is forced to sign.
I reckon 99.9999% of workers in other jobs would be over the moon to pocket 50% of what customers pay.
Award winners are always going to be subjective, until we can make a more objective process like most called, most buzzed, most perved etc.
It's the same with how most overrated and most underrated will always be subjective too.
Brooksie's award success might be due to the type of FTA show she puts on in comparison to her daytime and night time peers.
Also punters might use various reasons for deciding who to vote for, like what she looks like, what she does, what she wears etc.
I agree with you about Brooksie having a cracking arse.
How people vote always baffles me. If Brooks wins the UK Babe Channels Night Babe of the Year, the surely the Ultimate Babe Award is exactly the same. Some say different, but for me they're the same. The only difference is the knockout format in the Ultimate Babe award kicked Brooks out at the last 8 stage. Brooks was 2nd seed, but it roughly the same members voting you would expect her to be No.1 seed. Perhaps, after her win, some voters who were maybe 50/50 on Brooks & another babe, figured, why not have a different winner.
The difference to winning & losing is a marginal thing. Another factor is that we are always looking for the next best babe, often newish babes fair better than some established babes, I think we can get blinded & overlook how good some of the established babes still are, in comparison to the newer ones.
I think it's far too early for Brooks to be considered overrated. She's still relatively new, so far, she's been consistently excellent in terms of performance on web & tv, that is clear to see, regardless of whether her figure & overall looks are what appeals to everyone. She has one of the best attitudes & comes across as being very humble regarding her success.
(23-12-2022 16:26 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]Award winners are always going to be subjective, until we can make a more objective process like most called, most buzzed, most perved etc.
Awards can never be objective. Objective success is acknowledged in other ways. This business, like any other business, works on a holistic system of checks & balances, quality rather than just quantity.
Your suggested criteria are all flawed - such as the most calls; someone could take lots of short calls in the same time that someone else takes longer calls - is that fair then?
Take the "best avatar" award in this forum, where you can win the same award with the same bloody avatar year in and year out. This makes no sense at all!
There, I said it.
Objectivity: Ones own opinion
Subjectivity: Opposing opinion
Overrated: Any babe that is not ones own cup of tea
I'll get my coat
Cynical old Snooks