Was just browsing through this thread and seems that Lucy-Anne and Kerrie Lee are very frequent babes that keep cropping up in peoples choices
(09-03-2017 14:11 )Tori Lee Addict Wrote: [ -> ]Was just browsing through this thread and seems that Lucy-Anne and Kerrie Lee are very frequent babes that keep cropping up in peoples choices
Never saw too much of Kerrie Lee so can't really say. Can certainly see why Lucy-Anne's name pops up.....great looking girl, great (much improved!!) rack, but lacking a certain something, difficult to put your finger on IMO
Overrated to me means the effort the girls put in compared to the amount of screen time they get. In that respect it has to be the twins and Danni Harwood. I would also add Ashley Emma, who some think is now some top draw performer just because she takes her knickers off. She's always been dull and boring and is still dull and boring and spends the majority of her shifts lay on her stomach and doing not much else.
^^^ Agree with your definition of 'over rated' and, again, it's all subjective as I don't personally think Ashley Emma falls into that category but the twins do IMO.
I will have to agree, yeah the twins sort of do lol
i get the impression that some people just view the channels, and the opinion of somebody who is just a viewer may well differ from those who call the girls.
I have called many of the girls over the years and found many particularly boring on the phone, although fantastic to look at.
Who exactly would you say is boring on the phone and fantastic to look at though?
(09-03-2017 14:11 )Tori Lee Addict Wrote: [ -> ]Was just browsing through this thread and seems that Lucy-Anne and Kerrie Lee are very frequent babes that keep cropping up in peoples choices
I included those two in mine. I think I was being harsh on Kerrie Lee, I didn't see too much of her, but she did seem to try hard, and by all accounts from reading on the forums she isn't a diva either.
I included Lucy Anne because I find her relatively modest looking in comparison to a lot of day babes on Studio 66, and I've seen her being named as one of the better looking girls. To be fair, in terms of looks, a good few of the Studio 66 day babes would be contenders for Victoria Secrets models if they were taller. Although height wouldn't be an issue for Cara Steel or Fernanda Ferrari.
Wouldn't worry about justifying and explaining you choices mate, very few other people have lol
(09-03-2017 15:18 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: [ -> ]Overrated to me means the effort the girls put in compared to the amount of screen time they get. In that respect it has to be the twins and Danni Harwood. I would also add Ashley Emma, who some think is now some top draw performer just because she takes her knickers off. She's always been dull and boring and is still dull and boring and spends the majority of her shifts lay on her stomach and doing not much else.
Ashley is the most boring performer ever