06-03-2016, 15:06
^it's studio66 being careful about compliance, got absolutely nothing to do with 'special privileges'.
it's not that hard to grasp really.
it's not that hard to grasp really.
(06-03-2016 19:10 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]The issue with Fernanda is quite simple.
Her outfits are provocative - hence her popularity and getting more attention from those who would report misdemeanors to Ofcom.
Having such videos, caps within the compliance period just makes it easier for the 'reporter'.
But maybe those who see it different would be happy to pick up the tab when s66 get fined. But maybe not.
(06-03-2016 14:00 )skully Wrote: [ -> ](06-03-2016 12:02 )Bantams Wrote: [ -> ]I've heard this said before but never known why? What's so special about her that she gets special privileges? It didn't used to be the case with her. Is she royalty all of a sudden now
If you take a look in the S66 section you'll see a post made by Terence (here)...
Quote:Studio 66 have decided that videos can be posted without waiting 8 weeks provided that any accidental non-compliant footage is removed (slips, unfortunate flashes, apparent rubbing etc). However, Fernanda's videos are excluded from this, so still 8 weeks for those.
Our video posters will be contacted with regards to this change. If you haven't been in the next few days, please contact one of us for more details.
So although we are letting some things slide, we are being strict with Fernanda due to her having her own delay of 8 weeks.
It's an issue of compliance, not privilege