^.........possibly. Amongst others.
Your lack of honesty and transparency is no surprise.
If I was spreading rumours started by Scottishbloke I would be reluctant to admit it too.
I wouldn't normally, you understand, but a couple of other people that I have discussed similar matters to in the past, have said the same thing.
(06-01-2016 13:23 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ] (06-01-2016 03:18 )Robot Devil Wrote: [ -> ]^Certain people, who shall remain nameless, but are very well known on this, and another forum, insist that Kerrie has joined BS. Like you Rammy, I've seen no supporting info anywhere. So maybe she hasn't and those folks are misguided. We'll see.
Indeed we will see if Kerrie-Lee is joining bs. At the moment I don't think she is & if she is leaving s66, I think she's leaving the shows altogether. Hopefully she will say soon what she's doing
I heard a week back on twitter form people I would think are in a position to have such info that she was talking to bs,
So there could well be something in it, guess time will tell, don't see why some what to stop the discussion, and no I did not get the info from scottishbloke
As for if Kerrie was happy there, guess that depends what u mean, as far as I know she did not hate it and enjoyed much of being at 66 but she did not like how she was always booked in a 2 and wanted more shift's, again this info is from people I believe to be in a position to know,
Make of it what u will everything I have posted is in good faith
(06-01-2016 16:51 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]Your lack of honesty and transparency is no surprise.
If I was spreading rumours started by Scottishbloke I would be reluctant to admit it too.
With all due respect this seems to me like a cheap shot jibe against an ex forum member who is not present or able to defend himself (unless he decides he wishes to return). Whatever people's opinions of or disagreements with ex forum members should be left at the door upon their departure.
I disagreed with Scottishbloke and some of his logic on some things but am not going to bring all that stuff up.
It is not necessary.
It seems that more than just one person is of the belief that Kerrie may be heading to BS.
Just because one particular ex member of this forum may have this belief is no cause to single them out and not others.
Whatever Kerrie decides, she decides.
End of story.
It is about her, not about who gets proven right as to what she decides to do
.
spot on snookered. it's about Kerrie-Lee not about people point scoring about what she's doing.
whatever she ends up doing. I will support her
(06-01-2016 19:26 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]With all due respect this seems to me like a cheap shot jibe against an ex forum member who is not present or able to defend himself (unless he decides he wishes to return). Whatever people's opinions of or disagreements with ex forum members should be left at the door upon their departure.
I disagreed with Scottishbloke and some of his logic on some things but am not going to bring all that stuff up.
It is not necessary.
It seems that more than just one person is of the belief that Kerrie may be heading to BS.
Just because one particular ex member of this forum may have this belief is no cause to single them out and not others.
In many forums it is not permitted to post anonymous stories or rumours without an identifiable source. This forum does allow this to happen and since that is the case it’s surely reasonable to speculate on who these anonymous sources might be and to try and assess the credibility of the same.
You claim that Scottishbloke’s reliability should not be questioned here, but you are guilty of a nasty double standard, as you do not seek for his rumours or claims to be similarly excluded. His stories may be published here, but you argue that assessment of them is forbidden?
You further state that more than one person is of the belief that Kerrie may be heading to BS, but like previous posters making such statements you decline to name these people. As I have previously observed, some forums do not tolerate this kind of behaviour.
You further claim that I am singling Scottishbloke out. This is untruthful. It just happens to be the only name I’ve guessed. If the posters who don’t trust their sources enough to name them had a bit more backbone, I would happily comment on those names too.
The story itself may be true or it may be untrue, who knows? But for you to suggest it may not be questioned here or that its origins may not be explored or assessed (because the perpetrators may not be present) brings shame and disrepute on your own character.
Who gives a fuck about this he said she said bullshit
She's going...and since she is hopefully it's babestation she's going to!! St66 is a crap channel and lucy zzzzzzzzzara is proving that.
Not sure who the other blonde is and theres no need to find out because she's boring as fuck too
.