(30-01-2015 20:19 )elgar1uk Wrote: [ -> ]How does that affect Paul1982 though? He isn't on the continent.
Elgar this isn't about 1 individual it's about everybody who watches this show, either through the web or via Astra/Hotbird satellite hence the reason my point was valid
(30-01-2015 16:53 )Will Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]No. All the babe shows broadcast on Sky have to comply with Ofcom regulations, so this is no different to any other channel.
Also I was referring to Will Drifter's post. Not Pauls.
I see they've requested that no videos or "photos" (caps?) from the shows are posted on the Forum.
In that case, i suggest we ignore them completely.
On the flip side Tumble, does that mean they're a little worried about what could potentially happen? I guess some of the girls might be struggling to tame things down for our lovely Ofcom
But needless to say, I agree with with your point somewhat because I'm sure our cap posters know the difference between what should and shouldn't be posted, not to mention the mods will intervene and delete any such images/video's.
(31-01-2015 13:14 )Tumble_Drier Wrote: [ -> ]I see they've requested that no videos or "photos" (caps?) from the shows are posted on the Forum.
In that case, i suggest we ignore them completely.
o dear how not to get on side with a lot of there potential viewers/callers even before they start
not good,
once it became known that it was ETV behind the show i was not expecting a lot and this and a few other thinks posted make me think they are going down the xpanded route of a basic tv show designed to promote there web site
So are Babestation in agreement with this no photos or vids posted of the ETV/Euro babes shows ?, or do BS have no say in the matter ?, BS are involved with this "Euro babes" show as they call it and are promoting it as starting in the first week of Feb
https://twitter.com/BabestationTV/status...8107934720
ETV are neither the channel slot owners of Sky Ch 945 or the licence holders, the licencee of 945 would be regarded by Ofcom as the one responsible if the ETV girls broke the rules, and not ETV
The last time ETV broadcast on Sky TV and requesteted no vids or photos to be posted, Playboy were the licence holder of the channel they broadcast on
(31-01-2015 13:45 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]once it became known that it was ETV behind the show i was not expecting a lot
My thought exactly. So far Scottishbloke is the only optimist regarding this ETV show. Unless anyone else is feeling positive?
hmmm now i know why the euro lots are miffed about the situation just seen some laurn shows from this month Christ !!! if the UK girls did that would be a bloody meltdown off the forum
This. Channel is already set to fail interesting strategy
Hi guys,
i'm not surprised about this request
they always do it everywhere and they also have a person who periodically becomes a video-hunter, but for every one he find and get deleted, tens are uploaded again.
I guess that i can suggest you do not expect special stuff from etv girls, till now their TV shows are different than British ones, the big difference is that they are allowed to show pu***s and in rare cases also well framed but they never and never made, in the last few years, very hot shows (no porno, no simulation, no interactions between the girls and so on). The very big difference is that in the websites of british channels the situation is mostly different, in a lot of them you can get hot shows whilst it's impossible in ETV web site (pretty sure due to Bulgarians laws). If you are curious you can read a discussion on their "wall" about a premium show where one of their prettiest newbies shows a bit more she wanted and so they don't want to release the video (as they usually do) without deleting those parts.
A new channel which sets out to be as boring as what is already in place is not what we need