The sad thing is when stations get criticised for daring to try something different. It seems that anything departing from the usual routine is frowned upon here, because I suppose people just want to see the same standard shows all the time. Starlets of Babestation may not have lasted very long, before being given the chop, but at least Babestation TRIED to do something different and they ought to be given credit for that.
So has the channel stopped or just changed it's name.
It is still broadcasting with recognised babestation girls, which is what it has been doing since it started. So what's the difference?
(06-09-2014 14:11 )trevor format Wrote: [ -> ]The sad thing is when stations get criticised for daring to try something different. It seems that anything departing from the usual routine is frowned upon here, because I suppose people just want to see the same standard shows all the time. Starlets of Babestation may not have lasted very long, before being given the chop, but at least Babestation TRIED to do something different and they ought to be given credit for that.
agree, i don't blame BS it's the viewers fault for not showing enough interest and phoning in, there were two natural girls on last night and i keep hearing people saying they want to see more natural girls on BS well they put 2 natural girls on last night, but i suppose with Lori, caty, sophie and preeti on last night it was hard for amy and gina to get lots of calls
(06-09-2014 11:54 )Count Spankula Wrote: [ -> ]I think this forum is a good indicator of the level of interest in a channel and if you take the recently closed Studio 66 USA as a comparison its main thread received 114,000 views in 3 months. Compare that to Starlets of Babestation, discontinued after 1 month when it's main thread had reached 15,000 views.
To be fair, the only reason S66 threads are viewed so often is because of the countless debates usually stemming from their fuck-ups - chuck Rammy into the mix and there's some classic entertaining reads right there.
" No news is good news "
How many adult channels was starlets up against on sky? and with it being at the end of the food chain on sky hasnt helped the starlets cause,thats why it should of been on freeview and up against far less competition,i see its still listed as Starlets tho.
(06-09-2014 15:33 )Bandwagon Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair, the only reason S66 threads are viewed so often is because of the countless debates usually stemming from their fuck-ups
That's a silly comment.
There were plenty of fuck-ups on ChatGirl TVX but nobody bothered with their threads.
Simple fact - most people will not bother reading about channels which don't interest them, whether there are fuck-ups or not.
(06-09-2014 14:56 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]So has the channel stopped or just changed it's name.
It is still broadcasting with recognised babestation girls, which is what it has been doing since it started. So what's the difference?
This.
I just think there was way too much emphasis on here on what it was called. If they want to promote 'starlets' then can do it anytime they like on any of their channels. Not stopped them in the past.
Far as I'm concerned this was & still IS just a 4th Babestation channel.
(06-09-2014 13:17 )hairbald Wrote: [ -> ]As I said a while back, I always saw the Starlets name as a way of launching a new channel, making sure everyone mew where it was, and then it just becoming a standard channel.
Spot on. Marketing ploy, plain and simple.
(06-09-2014 16:19 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]I just think there was way too much emphasis on here on what it was called.
What it's called must matter greatly (to Babestation anyway) if they are changing it after only a month.
(06-09-2014 17:02 )elgar1uk Wrote: [ -> ] (06-09-2014 16:19 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]I just think there was way too much emphasis on here on what it was called.
What it's called must matter greatly (to Babestation anyway) if they are changing it after only a month.
^^^ Precisely. The 'names don't matter' brigade are wrong.