I don't understand the point of this show, if its about the best dancers then surely Faye or Ashley should have won as they were clearly better than Stacy. And if its about which amateur improves the most over a period of time then why pick semi professionals to be on the show in the first place. When a clearly inferior contestant wins due to popularity and not ability then it makes a mockery of the whole thing.
^ But surely you of all people understand that the right result does not always happen when you trust the public to vote
Yes; the public are stupid.... And we all know that stupid is as stupid does.... or summat like that..? lol
imho... ashley danced best overall on the night, but faye deserved the win for her series performances. joe was just the token male in the final.
Its not just down to the public, the bbc should make the show for amateurs only and keep it that way then it would be a level playing field and there could be no complaints.
(16-12-2018 16:05 )lancealot790 Wrote: [ -> ]Its not just down to the public, the bbc should make the show for amateurs only and keep it that way then it would be a level playing field and there could be no complaints.
Just seems to be Ashley because other singers have done the show and been liked
its not a dance show its an entertainment show
I understand its about entertainment but if you were Ashley or Faye and somebody who is clearly an inferior dancer finished ahead of you would you not feel just a little aggrieved?
The BBC could have paired Kevin with a monkey this year and the public would still have voted for him.
All I've been hearing is " Yes they were the worse, but Kevin's never won a glitterball"
I would appear that the rumours about Dianne and Joe Sugg being 'an item' is true. She left her boyfriend, somebody Quinlan from Emmerdale and looks like shacking up with Mr Sugg. Good luck to them, I hope it lasts longer than some of the other Strictly dancers who fell for the celebrity.
