Loving the variety of girls and outfits that appears on RLC. It's nice to see them always trying to get three different girls on as much as possible, unlike other companies.
Not sure what you guys find but on the one or two occasions i've rung the channel I've found the day chat very timid with anything leading to strong innuendo soon cut out.
More an observation than a critisism and I appreciate they are unfortunately guided by Mr O... but at £1.53 a min there needs to be something stronger in there somewhere to keep me on the line for a lenghty period.
I love a good chat myself but the chat / DTW option seems poor here, pity really as only the days do it for me really.....way too knackered after 9pm lol
I've never had any problems finding a DTW on RLC, but being into what I'm into I can use what a girl wears as a proxy. Talking about a girl's PVC miniskirt, for example, is just as good as strong innuendo for me.
Thats a fair comment we all get off on different things, a short skirt does it for me but I need a bit of banana & cream action to supplement it as well, which seems taboo on here, so the channel is not for me.
They seem to be employing a vast number of girls,and trying out new ones all the time. Does anyone feel they already have too many girls to give the big guns enough slots? Undoubtedly now,this has replaced 'Bangbabes' and along with Elite , has the highest standard of babes across the channels, yet if its at all possible,i feel they may be saturating thier own market!
Well it's been a great line up this morning with the lovely Ruby, Holly, and Rachel all looking stunning.
Just gonna put in my thoughts here..
I like(d) the RLC’s as they have some nice looking girls, and a few different sets, especially the office and hospital ones (although not used enough). They even have the girls, when in these sets, in the respective outfits too. So the fantasy/theme that i love so much is almost set.. but..
Generally, the girls (whether it be themselves or RLC) are quite restrained in their “performances” (movement etc) and refuse to show anything more than a bit of stocking top or a bit of cleavage. The camera people also refuse to show anything more than that.. even when there's a slight hint of something more (purposeful or not) they refuse to point the camera anywhere near.
Maybe because of this, the general camera work, in my opinion, is poor. It’s always so close, not only so close, but “positioned” so that the on screen graphic is always covering half the girl up, normally the legs (thus preventing, heaven forbid, a possible upskirt for example!)
It’s said that Ofcom are to blame. To a degree, yes, but how much credence is there in this “excuse” when other channels are not so restrictive?
And then there’s the calls - lots of people on here have commented that it’s a similar restrictive experience..
The channels, certainly for the moment, are not for me.
(10-05-2011 20:11 )schmoo Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe because of this, the general camera work, in my opinion, is poor. It’s always so close, not only so close, but “positioned” so that the on screen graphic is always covering half the girl up, normally the legs (thus preventing, heaven forbid, a possible upskirt for example!)
I'm not someone who waits for accidental nipple slips or flashes between girls' legs - doesn't interest me - so don't agree with much of your post, but you do have a point re the camera work.
Specifically, it often seems that the camera guys have little awareness of where the OSGs are and don't frame the picture accordingly so, for example, a girl will stand to show off a short skirt, but it will be lost behind the OSGs.
I don't agree about the camera being to close though. It simply isn't. The real culprits for that are Elite.
(14-05-2011 11:41 )DanniPandemos Wrote: [ -> ].. but you do have a point re the camera work.
Specifically, it often seems that the camera guys have little awareness of where the OSGs are and don't frame the picture accordingly so, for example, a girl will stand to show off a short skirt, but it will be lost behind the OSGs.
I don't agree about the camera being to close though. It simply isn't. The real culprits for that are Elite.
When the girls are laid down, no.
I hate watching when the girls lay down, so my point related to when they don't. I should have clarified that - apologies.
However..
Your post also referred to an example of when a girl is standing up to show off a short skirt.. a camera zooming out a little would therefore show it. So you're, if not indirectly, agreeing.. camera
is too close!?
And Elite, absolutely the real culprits - worst camera work/positioning (on screen graphics too) of all the channels in my opnion. So don't get me started!
(14-05-2011 13:30 )schmoo Wrote: [ -> ]Your post also referred to an example of when a girl is standing up to show off a short skirt.. a camera zooming out a little would therefore show it. So you're, if not indirectly, agreeing.. camera is too close!?
In that particular situation, yes, but that's only a small percentage of the time.