Surly this does not work as a business practice as other users must be like me who get one crap picture and say never again!
If I had received a good quality picture of what I had been promised I may well have gone back for more
why doesn't babestation clear this up instantly but just posting a couple of examples of the kinda thing that could be expected by purchasers?
couple of pics..which aint gonna cost them fuck all but can maybe go a long way with the likes of us..
seems logical to me anyway..
cheers
MrRude
if people who aren't happy with the service could PM us and include either the picture they received, or their mobile number, we can investigate it with our customer services team and try to get to the bottom of it
thanks
So last night I was watching Camilla doing her thing, she was having her p**sy and a$$ snapped by Geri.
So like a mug (I see that now) I txted in for pics of Camilla, within a half hour I must have txted in 3 times.
I get the confirmation txtbk, saying 'your pic will be with you shortly'.
Nearly 24 hours later and I have not got a single pic.
What the fuck is up with that? Was it just a scam?
It can't be anything wrong on my end, I have a full internet bluetoothed up iphone 3gs FFS!
(10-09-2010 21:39 )TakumiX Wrote: [ -> ]It can't be anything wrong on my end, I have a full internet bluetoothed up iphone 3gs FFS!
I might be wrong but think I read somewhere the pictures don't work with iphones
something to do with the software
(10-09-2010 21:39 )TakumiX Wrote: [ -> ]So last night I was watching Camilla doing her thing, she was having her p**sy and a$$ snapped by Geri.
So like a mug (I see that now) I txted in for pics of Camilla, within a half hour I must have txted in 3 times.
I get the confirmation txtbk, saying 'your pic will be with you shortly'.
Nearly 24 hours later and I have not got a single pic.
What the fuck is up with that? Was it just a scam?
It can't be anything wrong on my end, I have a full internet bluetoothed up iphone 3gs FFS!
unfortunately iPhones don't support the WAP links you receive when requesting a picture, they don't inform you you have received it either, they simply ignore it.
You've PMed us your number, i'll speak to our customer service team about it on Monday and they will contact you
4 pages of moaning about the service, yet I ask for a PM of the picture received or your mobile number to look into the problem and I receive 1 number..
are the people moaning actually using the service?! if so, why haven't you provided us with your number?
Text in on screen black box reads:- See between Tiffanys legs text tiffany to 69444.
What you actually recieve is a sideways pick of tiff on her knees in redish stockings.Thankyou Thankyou babestation
(11-09-2010 03:46 )biker200 Wrote: [ -> ]Text in on screen black box reads:- See between Tiffanys legs text tiffany to 69444.
What you actually recieve is a sideways pick of tiff on her knees in redish stockings.Thankyou Thankyou babestation
PM me your number so we can look it up and see what's going wrong
(11-09-2010 03:23 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ]4 pages of moaning about the service, yet I ask for a PM of the picture received or your mobile number to look into the problem and I receive 1 number..
are the people moaning actually using the service?! if so, why haven't you provided us with your number?
Maybe they're worried they'll get charged again, if the actual photo does get sent to them. Not to imply anything about yourself, but I think people are less at ease with giving their numbers to someone online, that they are actually speaking to, then texting to a channel on the TV, despite it not being much different. When they text on TV, nobody will know who they are on this board, or which number came from whom, yet you'll have their numbers and will know who they came from. I think some of the disappointed texters don't want to take the risk of having their number identified with their screen name, and the fact that they have complained. Sounds stupid, but I think that's the reason.