Cross referencing with another will she/wont she situation discussed & resolved in the forum is that of Louise (bless her, she'd be a massive asset to Elite) on TVX, who also works as a lap dancer,so presumably has no issues with stripping but won't do night shows 'cos she doesn't like the dirty talk; maybe Alice has similar issues, obviously no issues with stripping,she was doing that before she joined Elite, possibly she has social or domestic issues, but there was no evidence of that re all the build-up & hype leading up to her EliteNights debut, so maybe she has got the same issue as Louise, except in her case she actually tried it before she realised she didn't like it.
.........only a theory but everything fits, pity that Jamie or Alice, as forum members & knowing the fanbase on the forum & having read the relevant posts, don't at least have the courtesy to clarify the situation.
(26-06-2010 10:20 )RRROGER Wrote: [ -> ]Cross referencing with another will she/wont she situation discussed & resolved in the forum is that of Louise (bless her, she'd be a massive asset to Elite) on TVX, who also works as a lap dancer,so presumably has no issues with stripping but won't do night shows 'cos she doesn't like the dirty talk; maybe Alice has similar issues, obviously no issues with stripping,she was doing that before she joined Elite, possibly she has social or domestic issues, but there was no evidence of that re all the build-up & hype leading up to her EliteNights debut, so maybe she has got the same issue as Louise, except in her case she actually tried it before she realised she didn't like it.
.........only a theory but everything fits, pity that Jamie or Alice, as forum members & knowing the fanbase on the forum & having read the relevant posts, don't at least have the courtesy to clarify the situation.
I think you have made that point before RRRoger...You seem to think the girls, Jamie or production people owe us an explanation as to why a girl hasnt appeared...its none of our business frankly.
Louise told me that she didnt want to do nights because she earns far more on a night lapdancing than she could earn in a night on the phones. She does the days as she has the free time in the day to do it and earn a bit more cash with her free time. Wether or not she likes talking dirty is neither here nor there as she doesnt want to do nights! Fair comment i think!
Alice did a night and we should be grateful for having seen it, but in know way do i feel she owes us an explanation as to why she hasnt done another one, thats her business, her decision and good luck to her!
Exactly Aston, it is none of our business.
When Alice asked us, just over a month ago, if we would like to see her do nights. I said then, that she should try it, and only do what she feels comfortable with.
But this thread didn't even exist then, and considering there's 85 pages and nearly 850 posts been added to this thread in just over a month, it seems a little excessive to me for someone who's only done two night shows.
This has to be the fastest growing thread in the forum.
First & foremost, this is a forum,look it up in the dictionary,in that context,
IF IT'S NONE OF OUR BUSINESS, WHY THE FUCK DOES THIS FORUM EXIST?????
Jamie is a forum member, & perpetrator of this thread, amidst loads of fanfares & hype, that being so, why did he bother starting this thread if it's none of our business, as aceman65 states "fastest growing thread in forum," suggesting that there are a lot of people wanting to know the answers????
Re the comparison with Louise(topic for forum debate), astonv1 (up the Blues) dismisses it as irrelevant, the info he posted similar to Louise's reply to my post in XXXPornLive thread, READ THAT AGAIN, "Louise's reply", she's a forum member too ; my analogy, to my mind, very valid & a topic for further debate & clarification, not as motivation for rebukes for not minding my own business...........
To be fair in RRROGER's defence I think he's just intrigued and curious about this whole matter as we all are, aren't we?
As this is such a big thread it attracts a great deal of interest - some people will have just general interest in the matter where as others will take this more seriously and feel the need for an explanation, but I suppose if you never ask questions you will never find out.
I for one would like an explanation but I'm not going to demand one because quite frankly it isn't at the top of my agenda.
Well, in defence of Jamie.
yes I know, me coming to the defence of Jamie, when I'm normally slagging him or someone else off in regards to the webstream.
Oh the irony.
But this thread was actually started, to discuss the one night special, in which Alice was to take part. The thread was renamed later to include Alice's name, and it's exploded since.
And as for it being none of our business, unless any of us work, or are involved with the production of the Elite channel, it is none of our business.
We are just punters, customers, viewers, call us what you want. Jamie, Alice or any of the other presenters, production staff etc, don't have to come on here and answer questions. They choose to, for whatever reasons they have, be it for the fans, or promotion.
I'm not saying we can't discuss it, after all, it's a free forum. But we shouldn't expect to get answers.
(27-06-2010 01:06 )RRROGER Wrote: [ -> ]First & foremost, this is a forum,look it up in the dictionary,in that context, IF IT'S NONE OF OUR BUSINESS, WHY THE FUCK DOES THIS FORUM EXIST?????
Jamie is a forum member, & perpetrator of this thread, amidst loads of fanfares & hype, that being so, why did he bother starting this thread if it's none of our business, as aceman65 states "fastest growing thread in forum," suggesting that there are a lot of people wanting to know the answers????
Re the comparison with Louise(topic for forum debate), astonv1 (up the Blues) dismisses it as irrelevant, the info he posted similar to Louise's reply to my post in XXXPornLive thread, READ THAT AGAIN, "Louise's reply", she's a forum member too ; my analogy, to my mind, very valid & a topic for further debate & clarification, not as motivation for rebukes for not minding my own business...........
No-one is saying you cant discuss or speculate or even question why Alice hasnt appeared on nights again...but you seem to to think ALice or Jamie OWE you an answer...They dont...If i started a thread on you and your job would i have the right to start demanding answers as to why you hadnt turned up for work last week...NO but i could start speculating on it and you would have the freedom of the forum to answer if you so wished, just as Jamie and Alice do...They obviously dont want to answer so thats their choice and no amount of annoyed smilies is gonna change that...
re Louise in the above mentioned xxxpornlive thread she stated
"I don't do nights because I don't think I would be comfortable with the talking dirty aspect, I have massive respect to the girls who do it but I couldnt actually do it myself..." fair enough if you just take that comment but read the whole comment, which can be found
here to give it a bit more context and remember I spoke to Louise directly whilst she didnt say anything during our conversation about the filthy talk aspect of the job she did mention that it wasnt financially viable whilst she earned so much doing a few nights a week at the various clubs she works at..Thats what i based my comment on therefore it is neither here nor there wether she likes filthy talk or not based on what Louise told me herself, she only addressed the filthy talk issue as you had raised it in the post she was responding to...
Oh and btw are you like 4years old to think that saying "up the Blues" is really going to offend me??? well i just have one thing to say about that in a language you might understand....
(27-06-2010 01:26 )Josh187 Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair in RRROGER's defence I think he's just intrigued and curious about this whole matter as we all are, aren't we?
Yes we are Josh but we all dont go around stomping our feet demanding answers from people who dont owe us an explanation!!!!
(27-06-2010 02:33 )aceman65 Wrote: [ -> ]Well, in defence of Jamie. yes I know, me coming to the defence of Jamie, when I'm normally slagging him or someone else off in regards to the webstream. Oh the irony.
But this thread was actually started, to discuss the one night special, in which Alice was to take part. The thread was renamed later to include Alice's name, and it's exploded since.
And as for it being none of our business, unless any of us work, or are involved with the production of the Elite channel, it is none of our business.
I'm not saying we can't discuss it, after all, it's a free forum. But we shouldn't expect to get answers.
Thanks aceman, you hit the nail on the head, Jamie may have started the thread to advertise the one night special, the fact that it was changed to include her name meant that people thought ,thats it now Alice is a regular on nights and have had people speculating ever since...speculation is fine but we still have no right to demand that Alice or anyone else expains why they havent done another night because thats her business!
Let's put things into perspective from a rational point of view : the original concept of my posts was to suggest Alice stopped the night shows because she didn't like the dirty talk & made the analogy with Louise's situation (note that analogy means
similar to,not the same as), a very valid & plausible topical debate item I think.
The reference to Louise only specific to her posted reason for not working nights, ie the dirty talk; in context of this debate, the rest of her post & conversation with astonv1 is irrelevant.
As regards my concern about lack of info from either Alice or Jamie, as I've already posted that Louise took the trouble to clarify her situation, but the difference,(No analogy this time) is the lack of courtesy & consideration to their customers, & they know we're here; maybe we shouldn't expect or demand anything from them, but what pissed me off was that Alice posted her reason for abandoning her last night shift, ie established a rapport with the forum, generating couple of pages of sympathetic response from the forum; in those circumstances, as a forum member, a polite acknowledgement or thanks for the response would have been the least to expect; ie politeness & courtesy. (analogous to the situation between astonv1 & RRROGER???
).
......As Bamber Gascoigne used to say "I've started, so I'll finish"........I've made my point, agreeable or not to the forum
..............any further responses please post on "Twilight Zone" thread.!!!
EDIT.....reference my posting on Alice's debut night show, another analogous situation, Alice may have had a management gag imposed.
I would like to differentiate between two aspects of the curiosity surrounding Alice and the night shows.
a) Is Alice going to do a night show again? :- This is something I would like to know.
b) The reasons behind Alice doing or not doing a night show again. :- Couldn't give a flying fuck. None of my business and not interested in any case.
Appreciate I could be wrong here but it might be worth keeping these differences in mind.
