The UK Babe Channels Forum

(12-07-2011 05:02 )wayne01 Wrote: [ -> ]has she ever gone full frontal

It's better than that.....
http://www.simonscans.com/models/showmod...delid=1581

The dildo video is one of my all time favourites

yep charlie's gone well beyond full frontal. that dildo vid is one of my favs too

(12-07-2011 03:52 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]The only problem being once naked any babe is then limited to the same position.

spot on mate, if she knows she is going to be on for a 1 hour stint then their is no need for her to get naked in the first 5 mins as this makes for a very boring show,

Charlie is ever naked on the sofa or in school uniform, now for someone with her experience this is not good enough,

it amazes me that she never gets any criticism on hear for her lazy shows, i know she is pretty but she could do so much more as she has the talent

(12-07-2011 07:40 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]yep charlie's gone well beyond full frontal. that dildo vid is one of my favs too

I can only imagine the insanity if we found out that Dionne had done stuff like this as well

(12-07-2011 13:06 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]...
it amazes me that she never gets any criticism on hear for her lazy shows, i know she is pretty but she could do so much more as she has the talent

Well, I for one have criticized Charlie's performances, and I'm sure I'm not the only one, but possibly not in this specific thread, but within a wider discussion elsewhere.
I agree entirely, Charlie has a tendency to come on naked, or strip very quickly, then simply assume the position, and wiggle her butt around. That's fine for 5 minutes, but after an hour or so, as pretty and cute as she is, it's kinda like watching paint dry.
Even in the college outfit, she often removes her panties from under the skirt, which again limits what she can safely do, resulting in a rather dull, samey performance.

It's a shame as she is very naturally pretty, and has a nice personality, she seems full of mischief, with a hint of filth when she comes on the mic, and I'll bet she does a good phone call, but her on screen performances certainly need some work, a better screen presence means more calls, which is what it's all about. She could be one of the top girls on nights if she could address that.

munch

I'm not a big follower of Charlie's shows. But the difference might be that whereas her shows might be boring for someone who sees her in her few positions, and thinks, 'ah Charlie is on, think I will settle down and watch her for an hour' (can be boring). And someone who thinks 'ah Charlie is is on, looking very ready for a quickie and think I will ring within the next 15 minutes' (quite exciting, over shortly, and more profitable for Elite).

When seen like that, its probably the opposite of lazy. I would say its harder to keep to certain positions for a full hour.

I dont mind being wrong about this, but more importantly its what I think Elite producers think. But agree with you Munch that a screen presence is important, they need to be attractive viewing to build up fan bases for the callers as well. A variety of sessions is needed.

(12-07-2011 19:01 )Roquentin Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not a big follower of Charlie's shows. But the difference might be that whereas her shows might be boring for someone who sees her in her few positions, and thinks, 'ah Charlie is on, think I will settle down and watch her for an hour' (can be boring). And someone who thinks 'ah Charlie is is on, looking very ready for a quickie and think I will ring within the next 15 minutes' (quite exciting, over shortly, and more profitable for Elite).

I think I see your point, but I don't buy it
Seeing a girl lying fairly motionless with a naked back doesn't do it for me, and I suspect, most guys. If it's a 'quick turnaround' they are after, I would have thought they want a girl to do much more on screen, more provocative positions etc, get the viewers, and callers really steamed up, so they 'finish' faster, and also encourage more viewers to actually call in, not just to speak, but to listen in to the action. As it is, it looks more like a naked daytime show, a cosy chat on the phone with no clothes on, which I'm guessing isn't what the audience is after, so they are more likely to try elsewhere.

In the case of Charlie, I suspect it's not so much a laziness on her part, more a naivety. I suspect she gets the kit off, and kinda thinks that's it, that side of the job is done, and then concentrates on the callers. If there's laziness, it's more on the producers who fail to guide her and just let her do the same thing every night.

munch

remember though the shows are about the callers and that is the most important thing for charlie and if doing what she's doing now brings in the calls then shell carry on doing it

the reason you dont see many complaints about charlie is because shes consistent. shes also pretty good on the phone.
its also hard not to catch her without a smile on her face, which gives the impression at least that shes pleased to be talking to you.
she does cater more for her callers but thats to be expected, danica on the other hand tends to cater for her viewers which is a double edged sword.
in that she often gets complaints and compliments from people who have never called her. as the saying goes, just because your popular on the web doesnt make you popular in the real world.
where as i think the only complaints charlie gets is from the odd unhappy caller that got hung up on because he was to drunk or abusive...

She's great viewing..... it's hello viewers and then off with pants..

Totally tasty top talented totty