The UK Babe Channels Forum

Thanks for stating where you think we're at AD and for trying to tackle the thorny probem of what the operators think of all this.

I do feel some of the new things the main operators have been trying on the web of late seem to be aimed at countering possible consequences of implementing AV. But as you say I don't think anyone is fully aware of what all the ins and outs will be as yet.

66 are most definately paranoid about Ofcom getting the hump over pervcam. Nothing else could explain the ridiculous site of Evelyn (to name just one) trying last Tuesday to repeatedly cover the cam one minute only for to hold it proud for some time while directing it her feet the next. Literally 66 are making the thing seem more prominent than it is by constantly drawing attention to it with these supposedly precautionary directives.

There are areas though were the shows will lose out online if it's all put behind AV, like callers who watch on the web but can't or wont enter card details.

If the basic nudity of the live shows is judged as pornographic according to the BBFC's interpretation of the law (which gives a staggeringly broad interpretation of the word fit for a Sunday School teacher of the Teresa May type) then I can't see how everything can avoid being put behind AV. Even the day shows because can anyone really see them being given there own sites or some kind of time enabled AV (would that even be compatible with the law?). Is there any other realistic way around it?

No, as AD, says it'll most likely be kit and kabbodle and the operators will just try and step everything up a little to deal with it.

The babeshows just might have the idea that they can rewrite the expectations and standards of their web content, as they already have for TV, off the back of AV, while gathering the card details of previously stubborn holdouts into the bargin... but they are part of a larger context of porn that will remain free (ad and sponsor based) online after AV. They cannot counter the perception of 'something for nothing' this brings in the eyes of some - unluckily for them.

(14-02-2018 18:24 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]

(13-02-2018 22:47 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]AD, will the fta streams on the operators' websites be behind credit card AV come May?

The SS rep couldn't give a definite answer to this, so we simply don't know at the moment.

I think the channels coud take this in their stride. The thing that would worry them is Ofcom finding a way of banning pervcam from TV. That would really upset their finances. I suspect that they are reasonably relaxed about age verification, as they increasingly want people to pay to view anyway, with all the blurrovision, curtains etc they use nowadays. Contrary to the position with TV, I don't think the webshows are overly reliant on window shoppers.

I'm sure they regard their net business as generally derived from TV. As for card details for viewing, they always have the option of keeping the free shows 'respectable' enough not to need the age verification.

thats 2 days in a row the girl on sexstation has shown her pussy with out any restrictions, hopefully things are like this from now on,

Just seen tweet from Tory saying the show is ending this month .

What a shame they pulled the plug before it had a chance to get going or maybe it was too much of a distraction away from the god awful pervcam obsession babestation has , either way a real shame they didn't give it more than 6 weeks , shite camera equipment and zero support from the main bs sites to promote it.

As always the babestation bosses are so far removed from what people actually want !

A real waste of time bringing it back with a crappy show they were putting out with very little free pussy on show from most of the girls they had.

Hardly surprising really, didn’t make much sense bringing back. It was always going to just be another carbon copy of BS daytime web.

i find this disappointing just as they are getting going they drop the show before people can get used to calling it,
thing is when they have let the girls preform and show pussy for free like they where last week or had a big name on like Jess West the girls have been busy on the phone,
when they used it as the 3rd bs daytime web show it didnt work as that was not what the people who call where looking for,
by doing this bs has lost them self callers who want a harder show, its dim as should be trying to get the biggest fan base they can,
i never under stood why they used studio 2 as that added a lot of extra cost as had to light and heat it plus put a producer/cameraman over in the other building, if they had just mad it in the main studio there only cost would have been the girl on screen so it would have been almost money for nothing,
the face bs dont see this shows its no wonder bs dont make much money,

yet another bs gimmick that has ended up a damp squib

Wouldn't be a damp squid if more girls like Fench Cloe who is giving a fantastic cunt and wank show today. Phone her and direct her and everyone benefits . Including BS who must be making bundles out of her show toady. The phone and Perv haven't stopped, and that means everyone gets a free show as well. Well done babe shame its not going to last as its obviously what everyone really wants. Not the money grabbing posers who give little and want the world.

(23-03-2018 17:55 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]i find this disappointing just as they are getting going they drop the show before people can get used to calling it,
thing is when they have let the girls preform and show pussy for free like they where last week or had a big name on like Jess West the girls have been busy on the phone,
when they used it as the 3rd bs daytime web show it didnt work as that was not what the people who call where looking for,
by doing this bs has lost them self callers who want a harder show, its dim as should be trying to get the biggest fan base they can,
i never under stood why they used studio 2 as that added a lot of extra cost as had to light and heat it plus put a producer/cameraman over in the other building, if they had just mad it in the main studio there only cost would have been the girl on screen so it would have been almost money for nothing,
the face bs dont see this shows its no wonder bs dont make much money,

Totally agree mate.

I've been away for a while and therefore have missed the return of Sexstation, but reading this thread to catch up on things I've noticed an extreme difference of opinion here. Some people are disappointed by the show closing so quickly and others think it was only a gimmick anyway.

What is the truth I wonder?