The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Sex Station - Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
This is who they have signed so far according to there twitter
Alice judge
Tori
Tisha Holt
Tammy Oldham
Brook Logan
Chantelle fox
Chloe toy
Jessika Jinx
Karina Currie
Kayla
Kimmy haze
Louise Jay
Rachael
Samantha Bentley
Savannah

So basically 90% of rlc roster plus a few bsu favorites and moved a few of there girls who are not getting many tv shifts
Hmm interesting, a lot of those babes are more than comfortable naked “free to air” as was proven on unleashed/sexstation so it’ll be interesting how they’ll deal with the camstation or curtain station operating mantra that no doubt will be in place. Maybe it’s going to be slightly less restricted then BS daytime web? But why another show? Guess we’ll find out soon. Good list of babes though.
Kayla and Jessika are cracking choices for their roster.
^ I wonder if it will be fully encrypted so you have to sign up and do age verification in order to view it?
^ AV could be the plan down the line but I doubt it'll start out that way. There is no indication anyone knows for sure what if anything will become the AV standard gateway at the moment. Pumping money into a deal right now could be like putting all your bets on Betamax in the late 70s! Wink
^ They already use credit cards for site membership so what more would they need?
^ I see what your saying now, I thought you were speaking of AV as envisioned by the Bill. They would be able to do that only if they are happy to have it as an entirely seperate entity with individual site etc. and not have any carry over punters that have signed up for the new AV elsewhere. If there is any fta material on there the new type AV would get any site more traffic than expecting everyone to give credit card details specifically for that site.
Signing up to view could be a route that could work, pay a set fee and you can watch sort of like BSX but harder. If that was the case it then it could do alright, certainly might get me interested. But if that might be the case it sort of makes you think, why a) get rid of it in the first place and b) how is it going to effect the daytime webshow.
^ Got to agree, that is what's interesting here. What is going to be different from BSU about this (if it's not different then the question is why was Unleashed dropped in the first place)? The list of names winsaw posted earlier has some decidedly familiar names about it.

BS must consider it's not going to knock Daytime Web revenue overmuch; they must believe this'll appeal to customers in a way that that service doesn't? Is that purely down to how it'll be revenued?

There is a sense here of the reversal of a mistake in dropping BSU. They are obfuscating that by bringing it back under the more regarded name from the heyday of the shows in the hope of some reflected lustre from that time. Hopefully more than just the name will revived from back then.

At least they are looking in the right direction for inspiration. Keep looking and don't make it all superficial.
The two could easily coexist because they could offer different things, BS daytime web will still include primarily the daytime babes going curtained and sexstation can exist as the more so to speak "harder" playground for separate babes. Cant see any of the current daytime babes being to willing to go on a show where people wouldn't have to tip large sums to see anything. Certainly an interesting decision.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
Reference URL's