The UK Babe Channels Forum

Lola did some good ones today but then I saw 300 to see how many grapes she could fit in her mouth...and people paid it.

This Tip Goal thing is getting all very murky all the quicker now that competition between the main two operators is in effect on it. For all that is good and/or holds potential with it there are six events that are troubling it seems: Goals set at a too higher price for the action involved; babes/operators taking the piss out of punter's gullibility by dressing silly set ups as 'fun'; babes not going through with what they promised, babes setting goals they have intention of meeting; deliberate vagueness being employed in the osg titles... and don't get me started on the negativity inducing take that is 66's formative idea that all goal fulfilment should happen behind the paywall.

As ever this industry can't resist bringing its own services into disrepute if there's the chance of a quick buck to be made. Then when things go tits up it'll be blame the punters for not interacting as they should. Yeah okay.

Priya just did a 1 minute tip goal for 1000 credits. Now shes asking for 2000 to make it "filthier". Shes not doing much else apart from asking people on chat to hit tip goal.

I don't even have an account for these sites, it baffles me that people pay for these things.

Absolutely Scandalous what i'm reading when will brain dead punters who part with their cash wake up and smell the coffee and realise it's just a big rip off especially when there getting scammed for SFA in return

(30-12-2019 17:32 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]people could look at it bordering on prostitution sexual favours for money etc etc etc

Scam it might be, but get a grip ffs

(31-12-2019 01:55 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]

(30-12-2019 17:32 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]people could look at it bordering on prostitution sexual favours for money etc etc etc

Scam it might be, but get a grip ffs

some people might look at it that way i did not say i did

(31-12-2019 03:10 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]

(31-12-2019 01:55 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]

(30-12-2019 17:32 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]people could look at it bordering on prostitution sexual favours for money etc etc etc

Scam it might be, but get a grip ffs

some people might look at it that way i did not say i did

But you just thought you'd throw it out there anyway...

I Stand by my original Comment and for me it's the end of the subject

(30-12-2019 17:32 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]quite scandalous really people could look at it bordering on prostitution sexual favours for money etc etc etc

Scandal? The industry business model is non-contact, remote prostitution.

(31-12-2019 16:24 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]I Stand by my original Comment and for me it's the end of the subject

(31-12-2019 03:10 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]some people might look at it that way i did not say i did

That's called being a twat by proxy. Straight from the Trump playbook.