The UK Babe Channels Forum

Still doesn't really explain why BB didn't try harder to persuade her to stay...they must have a decent replacement in mind I am beginning to feel.

--------------------------------------------------------------
'The best way to get the better of temptation is to give in to it.'

agree bangbabes must have someone to bring in as losing stevie is a blow for them. i thought stevie did well on her bs debut. nice outfits especially the black bra and leather hotpants combo and to me gave the same performance she did on bb pre freeview. a bit tamer when she was on freeview but not by much. once she's worked a few nights on bs freeview shell be a lot better but nonetheless a good debut

and now she's with cellcast hopefully theyll do a site for stevie. cant wait to see her with the likes of, amanda, caty, daryl and reede and also louise

Stevie's move is a bit disappointing, as far as I'm concerned.

(17-09-2009 00:49 )Nigma Wrote: [ -> ]Seems like a step down tbh [.] Worse picture, more limiting sets and a tendancy to stifle the girls performances.

Spot on. I've said it before, and I'll say it again (here!): Babestation means a poorer picture (909 is very soft-focus since they've switched to the wide-screen format, and the lighting is still not bright enough compared to Bang Babes and Elite), more microphone jabber over the girls performances as they try to flog photo sets, and shorter, and choppier stints on the beds, as the babe on mic interrupts the performance of the babe on the bed by jumping on alongside her and wrecking the vibe. Then there's the almost universally hated split-screen to contend with.

It's a shame the way they keep fiddling with the 'shape' of these shows, and that goes for almost all the channels. When Stevie first started on Bang Babes, that shows presentation was about as good as it gets. It was simply and strongly organised - simple, classic bed sets that didn't draw attention to themselves and get in the way of the performance; strong lighting; good camera-work; a sharply defined picture, and you got a solid 45 minutes of each babe before they rested and rotated. BB has since become fussier (the kitsch locker-room/tube train sets) and more chopped up, so in that sense Stevie moving isn't as painful as it would've been half a year ago. Bang Babes is still a more organised show than the messily structured Babestation though, and I'd still prefer Stevie to be on there, or failing that, Elite.

This "Big Name" replacment, could it be a daytime babe???? BB must be confident to let one of their top girls go. Know who my money is on!!

a few Stevie pics


Free Adult Image Host - ImageChunk.com

(17-09-2009 09:18 )Danzig Wrote: [ -> ]Still doesn't really explain why BB didn't try harder to persuade her to stay...they must have a decent replacement in mind I am beginning to feel.

--------------------------------------------------------------
'The best way to get the better of temptation is to give in to it.'

lets be realistic, very doubtful that a girl will say they got sacked, just does not look good. stevie was their best so there loss.

Maybe it was just financial at the end of the day. Donna Duke left BS for BB for better money maybe Stevie did the same...they certainly need a big draw like her on Freeview.

------------------------------------------------------------
'The best way to get the better of temptation is to give in to it'

(17-09-2009 19:31 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ]This "Big Name" replacment, could it be a daytime babe???? BB must be confident to let one of their top girls go. Know who my money is on!!

victoria? i want her back on nights

I think like Topman 47 said Stevie said that it was her decision to leave, perhaps she thought it was time for a change. I know the rules on Babestation are different to Bangbabes and it's a little more taim. but I am just Happy to have Stevie back on my screen

Anyway a few more pics


Free Adult Image Host - ImageChunk.com

same here. babestation is tamer than bb but nice to see stevie back