The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Live 960 - Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
I know I'm pretty much repeating what I said in my last post here, but I thought the point needed making more clearly and I'm hoping Live 960 and/or the girls on there might read this and offer their own views.

In a nutshell, I just wish the channel would change the record more often. The frustrating thing is that it has the potential to put out the best, rule-breaking shows around, and on very rare occasions does exactly that.

But on the whole Live 960 has become the single most predictable channel out there, with girls like Selena, French Chloe, Summer, Tia - in fact pretty much all of them, while very beautiful, offering very little in way of entertainment. It’s the same routine night after night and seems to consist of three basic elements that are repeated until the show ends at 05:30. These are: oiling up, lying on their backs with legs open, and crouched in the doggy position with their arse facing the camera. I wouldn’t mind if there was an element of risk to these shows, but the girls - most of them having dabbled with the more explicit side of their profession and therefore not exactly shy – do absolutely nothing that encourages the viewer to stay tuned. The ‘rubbing’ is all very safe and never even threatens the real target, and the sets and camera positions never change.

I know there’s other channels that could be accused of being just as predictable, but the reason I’m singling out Live960 is because of the potential I feel is there. It’s under-achieving is what I’m trying to say and I think that in the current climate a channel that doesn’t offer a reason to tune in could suffer badly.

Come on, bring back the spontaneity and risque shows, please!
I would love nothing more than to see Chloe & Tia in an eight hour lesbian fuckfest (with a half hour break Wink ) but thats never gonna happen. And the truth is, Live960 is a small channel which has already felt the wraith of the OFCOM killjoys, and cant really afford to feel that wraith too often. Given the straight choice of these 'tame' shows (a point that I cant really agree with, considering I witnessed the frustration of Tia on TVX) or nothing at all, which would be likely outcome if they tried to push the boundaries, I'll take the current shows. The slightest hint of 'rule breaking' & the other channels, as well as OFCOM will be after them (cos who else do you think makes the complaints?)
Anyone know the girl for tonight?
Maybe I read too much into the way these channels operate, but I have to ask if anyone else is wondering what the hell is going on at Live 960?

I know I’ve already touched upon the predictability and tameness of the girls’ performances of late, but since last night they seem to have switched to using a camera with a much loftier position, instead of the usual bed-height one that allows the girls to be shot from foot to head. This new camera set-up seems to have been done with the sole purpose of allowing the girls to be framed from above the waist only, when in a lying position, and it’s quite obvious to me that the operators have been told to keep shots of the girls’ nether regions down to a bare minimum, especially if their legs are spread.

There’s being cautious, then there’s this, which is just ridiculous.

Come on, Live 960, what gives?
Is it just that folk are getting tired of my whinging, or am I really the only one who can see how much this channel has gone down hill? Within the last three weeks it's gone from being my favourite to one that I bother with less and less with every passing day.

If no one can agree completley, then please someone tell me they've at least noticed how shoddy the camerawork has become? If they're not cropping off the bits we want to see with the bottom of the screen, they're using the OSG to obscure them instead. And I'm not being paranoid. If you watch for just a few minutes, you can see the cameraman working this. He's constantly looking for ways to obscure or lose the girl's nether regions from view.

I'm convinced this channel has changed hands (yet again). When was the last time anyone here saw a post from Live 960 or Dannie - both regular posters in the past?
(28-01-2010 00:20 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]Is it just that folk are getting tired of my whinging, or am I really the only one who can see how much this channel has gone down hill? Within the last three weeks it's gone from being my favourite to one that I bother with less and less with every passing day.

If no one can agree completley, then please someone tell me they've at least noticed how shoddy the camerawork has become? If they're not cropping off the bits we want to see with the bottom of the screen, they're using the OSG to obscure them instead. And I'm not being paranoid. If you watch for just a few minutes, you can see the cameraman working this. He's constantly looking for ways to hide or lose the girl's nether regions from view.

I'm convinced this channel has changed hands (yet again). When was the last time anyone here saw a post from Live 960 or Dannie - both regular posters in the past?

Yes definitely Been saying this on the Bella thread Constant side shots of head and shoulders at just the wrong time or zooming in so close only the stomach upwards can be seen Its bloody frustrating when the girl is obviously working hard to show herself off and the cameraman is deliberatley ignoring it At first I thought it was some kind of timer on the camera or plain incompetence but now I agree its deliberate direction
(28-01-2010 00:26 )verona Wrote: [ -> ]Yes definitely Been saying this on the Bella thread Constant side shots of head and shoulders at just the wrong time or zooming in so close only the stomach upwards can be seen Its bloody frustrating when the girl is obviously working hard to show herself off and the cameraman is deliberatley ignoring it At first I thought it was some kind of timer on the camera or plain incompetence but now I agree its deliberate direction

Thank God for that.

I wonder how long the new managment are expecting their callers to tolerate this bollocks?
does anyone know why you can't phone to listen in anymore?
(28-01-2010 01:01 )Ostrogoth Wrote: [ -> ]does anyone know why you can't phone to listen in anymore?

Listen option is working ok, might have been a momentary gremlin in the system.
I really like 960. It has excellent presenters like Chloe, Tia, Toni Samantha and Bella Heart HeartHeart and the shows are sometimes exceptional but even I am finding the 'Girl on the Line' box when the one of the presenters goes off to be serially repetitious. annoyed
This girl always seems to wait for the first presenter's break, is always on the phone for a long time and I've given up listening in as the phone line quality is so much better than other callers. Does something smell fishy here?
Maybe I'm being grumpy as I'm missing the lovely Bella but come on....annoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyedannoyed
Remember, I really like 960 but it is starting to feel like Hotel Voyeur/Latin babes dejavu all over again (Yogi Berra, catcher NY Yankees, world series in the 1950s interview)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Reference URL's