How to improve Babestation

They could just search the web for old bs clips and watch them over and till the penny drops about how good a product they could be providing based on what they used to do,also may like to consider bringing back Private Babe.

how to improve....?

PUT ME IN CHARGE

What bsx needs is a studio with 2/3 girls, with a girl working the camera and NOBODY ELSE.

(12-10-2016 11:16 )Juggles Wrote:  Fire all the cameramen and hire camerawomen, some of the girls might be more comfortable if there were no men around and they might start being a bit more risque in their performance.

I'm just catching up on this thread and there have been some very good comments made. However this one is plain silly. Nobody's going to bring back the glory days of Babestation or any of the the babe channels by making trivial changes like this. Serious action is needed to improve things.

Camerawomen are nothing new anyway. Storm TV use a camerawoman half the time and in the past Xtreme Filth used a camerawoman almost all the time. In fact I think all the channels have used a camerawoman at some time or other. Harmony Hex used to work the camera at Babestation, did she not?

Suggesting that camerawomen make a difference to a show's output is truly clutching at straws.

(16-10-2016 14:39 )barracuda Wrote:  Yes we could all say that Babestation would be better if it only booked girls who are our personal favourites.

It doesn't advance the discussion about what measures Babestation should take to revitalise their channels.

Those people listing out their favourite girls should remember that your favourite girl could easily be someone else's least favourite.

I'm surprised only 6% think the call price is too high. Maybe it's a reflection on the number of voters who actually call the shows, though.

(17-10-2016 14:15 )davetherave57 Wrote:  What bsx needs is a studio with 2/3 girls, with a girl working the camera and NOBODY ELSE.

Cutting down the number of girls a night would not restore Babestation to its former glories. On the contrary it would have a negative effect.

If Babestation went down to its 3 channels having only 2/3 girls a night we would know it was truly the beginning of the end.

Having a girl working the camera would make no difference whatever to broadcast output. It would be the ultimate in futile gestures.

(19-10-2016 14:05 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(17-10-2016 14:15 )davetherave57 Wrote:  What bsx needs is a studio with 2/3 girls, with a girl working the camera and NOBODY ELSE.

Cutting down the number of girls a night would not restore Babestation to its former glories. On the contrary it would have a negative effect.

If Babestation went down to its 3 channels having only 2/3 girls a night we would know it was truly the beginning of the end.

Having a girl working the camera would make no difference whatever to broadcast output. It would be the ultimate in futile gestures.

I was talking about that supposed porn channel bsx not the main channels which btw is beyond repair.

The sex of the camera operator is irrelevant. It is there lack of basic camera operating skill ( exposure, white balance,focusing, panning etc ) that's the problem.

(19-10-2016 15:04 )davetherave57 Wrote:  

(19-10-2016 14:05 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(17-10-2016 14:15 )davetherave57 Wrote:  What bsx needs is a studio with 2/3 girls, with a girl working the camera and NOBODY ELSE.

Cutting down the number of girls a night would not restore Babestation to its former glories. On the contrary it would have a negative effect.

If Babestation went down to its 3 channels having only 2/3 girls a night we would know it was truly the beginning of the end.

Having a girl working the camera would make no difference whatever to broadcast output. It would be the ultimate in futile gestures.

I was talking about that supposed porn channel bsx not the main channels which btw is beyond repair.

To be honest I think ALL babeshows are under threat. Blame that on high costs, free online porn and public unpopularity, especially with women.