Click here to watch Studio 66


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 24 Vote(s) - 3.04 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Ladyboys - a serious debate

Author Message
vostok 1 Offline
Twitter Troll

Posts: 1,613
Joined: Nov 2008
Post: #21
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
(24-02-2010 00:12 )astonv1 Wrote:  I didn't know that some of these Asian Babes were actually Asian dudes Big Grin

Now personally i hold no prejudice towards people with differing sexual tendancies but I think really they should be making it more clear on this channel that its possible you could be talking to a guy.

I think that was Stan's point.

Perhaps it would be beneficial to all to have the onscreen captions reflect this. To let the potential caller know who they would be talking to.

As previously mentioned, the Lady Boys seem to be the most popular in relation to call minutes, so onscreen captions could increase the amount of calls also.
24-02-2010 00:29
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
seth Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 24
Post: #22
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
(23-02-2010 20:04 )SOOPSOOP Wrote:  I like how you say I'm not homophobe but call homosexuals 'queer' laugh

That would be like saying I'm not racist about these n*&^%$£rs!

Calling homosexuals queers does not make him homophobic. Sure you could argue it's inappropriate language but making a homophobic comment and being homophobic are two different things. The same applies to racist comments.

In regards to this channel. If these are ladyboys then surely what this channel is doing is illegal as they're deceiving the public.

Anyway, I don't bother with the channel.
(This post was last modified: 24-02-2010 04:13 by seth.)
24-02-2010 03:50
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gyalis_star Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 156
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 11
Post: #23
"girls" on the asian channel
i havent been on here in a while but kinda thought i had to speak out after having a quick look through the notice board, i just wanted to no am i the only person thats noticed a few of the girls on that asian channel have pulges in there underwear? that there constantly repositionin them self? some one please tell me that iam wrong cause if thats not false advertising i dunno what is!

havent bin here 4 a while hummm wonder who missed me lol
26-02-2010 02:30
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chilly Away
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 7,577
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 161
Post: #24
RE: "girls" on the asian channel
^^^^ Send StanTheMan a PM. He loves this stuff. Wink Big Grin
(This post was last modified: 26-02-2010 02:59 by Chilly.)
26-02-2010 02:32
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #25
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
(23-02-2010 14:31 )Josh187 Wrote:  I could not hardly care to be honest - i don't watch the channel, i never have really, and i have no plan to, it's most certainly the worst babe channel out there - so why care so much about?
Because we don't all hold the same views and opinions, maybe?

Quote:Maybe they couldn't find many genuine decent Asian babes to put on this channel so they turn to men? who knows?
The majority of the presenters are women, which is why I watch it. They never used to have shemales.
(This post was last modified: 26-02-2010 06:03 by StanTheMan.)
26-02-2010 06:02
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #26
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
(23-02-2010 23:48 )thinwhiteduke Wrote:  Stan i'll take your word for it that you're not homophobic but why on another thread did you think it appropriate to call them "freaks" ?

Fair question, thinwhiteduke. It was wrong of me, I apologise, but it was said in anger.

Now I suppose someone's going to ask me how many 'freaks' I've beaten up in 'anger' bladewave
(This post was last modified: 26-02-2010 06:06 by StanTheMan.)
26-02-2010 06:05
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Sooky™ Offline
The Rack Attack!!
*****

Posts: 9,745
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 217
Post: #27
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
Stan - how many 'freaks' have you beaten up in 'anger'? Wink

(This post was last modified: 26-02-2010 06:19 by Sooky™.)
26-02-2010 06:18
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #28
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
(26-02-2010 06:18 )SxciiSooky Wrote:  Stan - how many 'freaks' have you beaten up in 'anger'? Wink

Oh, man! Loads! I've lost count.
26-02-2010 14:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
amandasnumerounofan Offline
Massive Amanda Fan

Posts: 119
Joined: Nov 2009
Post: #29
Asian Babes- or is it?
Due to the fact that they have so many ladyboys, does anybody else find the title of the channel misleading.
22-03-2010 20:06
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Josh187 Offline
The Fallenangel returns

Posts: 1,089
Joined: Oct 2009
Post: #30
RE: Asian Babes- or is it?
Not another Asian babes thread, Yes the title is misleading but i think they know, no one will call up a bunch of ladyboys, so they pretend they are 'babes' I just hope the ladyboys have perfected their women voices Bounce
I honestly couldn't careless about this channel. No one cares for this channel other than StanTheMan, so couldn't you of talked to him about this in private. laugh

(This post was last modified: 22-03-2010 21:04 by Josh187.)
22-03-2010 20:11
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 



Click here to watch Studio 66