The Naked Question

(30-01-2010 22:04 )Dan Volatile Wrote:  I've read as many if not more posts in praise of full nudity as as I have against, and yet you think the shows producers are only listening to and acting on one strand of opinion. Personally I think call volume is likely to be the major/only criterion they are concerned with. There may also be a silent majority out there who, literally, could not give a toss one way or the other.

I don't know what they take notice of. It was noticeable that a thread was started on the Babestation forum with most of the contributors seeming to say it had become boring. Since that thread appeared the girls who go naked have done so less often. Coincidence? Maybe. However, it isn't beyond the realms of possibility that the views of a ready made review site such as this do have some bearing, given that people who take time to contribute on here are regular viewers.

Personally, there are girls on the channels I never watch because I find them boring but I'm not going to pipe up and say oh I can't watch her because she's too boring. I just switch over, accept that there are people who do like them and leave it at that.

And as I say, for the past 3 years or so, all we've had is channels pretty much rigidly sticking to the same formula. Topless girl, on a bed, in one of the half a dozen positions they can realistically get into. Before Elite came along and started to bring some new stuff to the party, I'd pretty much given up on these channels but for the most part the various channels have kept my attention since.

It started with the girl on girl stuff that other channels followed with, then the naked stuff that other channels went along with but they seem to be slowly slipping back to that point a year ago where it was pretty much all round tedium.

And whilst the part of my post you highlighted was pretty clumsy, mainly due to me trying to keep an eye on several sporting events at the same time I was writing it, I still don't understand why some people feel the need to make comments that are basically implying that the channels should all return to a position of almost uniform conformity.

What do you expect from a sexually suppressed country, the UK is one of the most backward looking of the main States of the EU, nudity in the UK is seen as pornography unlike the near continent where it is seen as au naturele. A man is now a paedophile, sex offender, faces prison and pariah of Society if he looks at or has possession of nudity featuring a 16 or 17 year old girl, a family photograph of his kids playing in the bath or garden paddling pool, a naturist family who have any this material or an Art Gallery who have artistic nudity of under 18 year olds. Total madness. You have about as much chance of seeing full nudity no less "lady bits" on BS as seeing flying pigs. They should rename this country the Sexual Desert Of Draconia.

personally i like the nudity as it is something 'different'. however i much prefer it when they just cover with a hand or duct tape rather than a big sheet or cloth which covers more than granny pants. i also like it when they are knickerless and laid on the front so as to show bare ass which kinda gives the illusion of nudity. going knickerless also increases chances of a pussy flash.

(31-01-2010 15:21 )coin Wrote:  What do you expect from a sexually suppressed country, the UK is one of the most backward looking of the main States of the EU, nudity in the UK is seen as pornography unlike the near continent where it is seen as au naturele. A man is now a paedophile, sex offender, faces prison and pariah of Society if he looks at or has possession of nudity featuring a 16 or 17 year old girl, a family photograph of his kids playing in the bath or garden paddling pool, a naturist family who have any this material or an Art Gallery who have artistic nudity of under 18 year olds. Total madness. You have about as much chance of seeing full nudity no less "lady bits" on BS as seeing flying pigs. They should rename this country the Sexual Desert Of Draconia.

Dont agree with all you say,especially about 16 and 17yr olds,while some maybe mature enough to be displayed in that way,i feel most would be vulnerable to unscrupulous types who would take advantage of them,im sure you could be content with 18 and over,even some of them are immature,we have to protect the vulnerable,if your desparate to see "lady bits" go online to Sexstation they are on there all day.

In terms of whether girls should go naked that is up to them but to work on a night show you should have to at least go full frontal topless!!

(31-01-2010 17:34 )mikedafc Wrote:  In terms of whether girls should go naked that is up to them but to work on a night show you should have to at least go full frontal topless!!

As far as i am aware they do,dont they,BS,BB,Elite do i dont really know any other,except CP to see the lovely Chelsea.

(31-01-2010 16:54 )bombshell Wrote:  

(31-01-2010 15:21 )coin Wrote:  What do you expect from a sexually suppressed country, the UK is one of the most backward looking of the main States of the EU, nudity in the UK is seen as pornography unlike the near continent where it is seen as au naturele. A man is now a paedophile, sex offender, faces prison and pariah of Society if he looks at or has possession of nudity featuring a 16 or 17 year old girl, a family photograph of his kids playing in the bath or garden paddling pool, a naturist family who have any this material or an Art Gallery who have artistic nudity of under 18 year olds. Total madness. You have about as much chance of seeing full nudity no less "lady bits" on BS as seeing flying pigs. They should rename this country the Sexual Desert Of Draconia.

Dont agree with all you say,especially about 16 and 17yr olds,while some maybe mature enough to be displayed in that way,i feel most would be vulnerable to unscrupulous types who would take advantage of them,im sure you could be content with 18 and over,even some of them are immature,we have to protect the vulnerable,if your desparate to see "lady bits" go online to Sexstation they are on there all day.

It has nothing to do with age or maturity of the individual with nudity, the point I am making is that the UK is unique in having draconian laws that penalise to the degree of ruining ones life for possession of under 18 totally innocent and consenting nudity. A hypothetical example:- you, your mate and your 17 year old girlfriends go on holiday, you take some totally innocent snaps on the beach when your girlfriends are topless. These images possessed under UK law make YOU a peadophile, a sex offender, ruin the rest of your life and could face a prison sentence of up to 10 years, the same scenario applies to friends and families of Naturists who have family imagery taken in the Natruist environment. Mad or what!!!!

(31-01-2010 19:17 )coin Wrote:  

(31-01-2010 16:54 )bombshell Wrote:  

(31-01-2010 15:21 )coin Wrote:  What do you expect from a sexually suppressed country, the UK is one of the most backward looking of the main States of the EU, nudity in the UK is seen as pornography unlike the near continent where it is seen as au naturele. A man is now a paedophile, sex offender, faces prison and pariah of Society if he looks at or has possession of nudity featuring a 16 or 17 year old girl, a family photograph of his kids playing in the bath or garden paddling pool, a naturist family who have any this material or an Art Gallery who have artistic nudity of under 18 year olds. Total madness. You have about as much chance of seeing full nudity no less "lady bits" on BS as seeing flying pigs. They should rename this country the Sexual Desert Of Draconia.

Dont agree with all you say,especially about 16 and 17yr olds,while some maybe mature enough to be displayed in that way,i feel most would be vulnerable to unscrupulous types who would take advantage of them,im sure you could be content with 18 and over,even some of them are immature,we have to protect the vulnerable,if your desparate to see "lady bits" go online to Sexstation they are on there all day.

It has nothing to do with age or maturity of the individual with nudity, the point I am making is that the UK is unique in having draconian laws that penalise to the degree of ruining ones life for possession of under 18 totally innocent and consenting nudity. A hypothetical example:- you, your mate and your 17 year old girlfriends go on holiday, you take some totally innocent snaps on the beach when your girlfriends are topless. These images possessed under UK law make YOU a peadophile, a sex offender, ruin the rest of your life and could face a prison sentence of up to 10 years, the same scenario applies to friends and families of Naturists who have family imagery taken in the Natruist environment. Mad or what!!!!

Sorry i dont believe we are unique,there are still countries that forbid topless sun bathing,i think age has to play a part,i dont think your example is a good one,this is all irrelevant anyway as i thought we were discussing,phone in shows and as long as it is on tv,i cant see the law changing,as there are a lot of irresponsible parents out there who do not monitor what thier children watch.as i said before there are other means of seeing "lady bits"

(31-01-2010 10:17 )aldershot1993 Wrote:  

(30-01-2010 22:50 )aceman65 Wrote:  I've noticed that Sportxxxbabes tend to go topless anytime around 21:30, but all the other channels don't until after 22:00. Now is this a personal choice by the respective producers, or is there an Ofcom ruling on this?

The TV watershed is 21:00 but Ofcom have been known to moan about sex material too close to the watershed time.

Ofcom states that there should be a gradual progresion towards adult content after the watershed... That's why I love the webshow, with no ofcom govening our content there is NO watershed.

Webshow
http://www.sexstationtv.com
No rules 100% of the time!

I'm currently a U.S. citizen living in London, and not all of it is Draconian IMO. To me, the UK seems more lenient on public nudity than in most parts of America. I've seen quite a few times in London, nude men or women dancing in the Trafalgar Square fountain, and they haven't been arrested, only asked to put their clothes back on with the threat of arrest. Also, I've seen some public nudity such as a model with her top off doing a photo shoot in front of a window inside a shop or club, where everyone can walk by and see her. In most places in the states, I'd imagine an arrest would be made, in most places at least.

Another thing slightly unrelated, is that there is nudity in some of the commercials on TV for kleenex or other regular products, though that might be aired after a certain. There's never any nudity in an commercial in the states, yet we have a huge porn industry. America is also very harsh as well, but not any less than England.

Eastern Europe isn't as harsh because they are more depraved

It's hard to find the right balance, and honestly both England and the states are hypocritical places. Sometimes they seem reasonable and lenient, and other times Draconian and overly strict.

On the topic of the babe shows, I do think a bit more nudity would be good. Nothing overly vulgar or obscene, but a little full on nudity here and there wouldn't hurt.